Left wing bias - Page 12

Scucca · 07-23-08, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und

Yet "right wing, and left wing" are less "vague and ambiguous" You again say nothing here.

I'd certainly be wary of any media bias publication that used the terms, given the ad hoc procedures that it offers the researcher. It becomes difficult to determine the robustness of results. We have no such problem with the direct study of voting behaviour.

Quote:

Everyone of my links provided evidence in a more neutral fashion than your intellectually bankrupt "right wingers are illogical and the left wing media does not affect voting" nonsense.

Your links? You've googled badly and presented irrelevance (you couldn't even be bothered to read what you googled). You still have offered no evidence to show that 'left wing bias' generates voting behaviour effects on a par with the QJE article.

Quote:

How silly are you? It demonstrates as you denied earlier that bias is not simply a right wing media phenomenon. You CHOOSE not to see it to fit your silly little pseudo-intellectual agenda.

You really should admit that you just employed shoddy literature review techniques. Referring to a theoretical paper in a discussion of empirical significance was a painful error.

Quote:

So you are admitting to willfull ignorance and puropseful obtusness. Good at least we agree on someting.

A somewhat random reply. I don't expect you to be an econometrician. However, your simple ignorance of hypothesis testing just will not do.

Quote:

I bet you sound real funny talking this nonsense in a hard cockney accent

Knowing your blinkered outlook, I'd have to assume that you follow a Dick Van Dyke understanding of cockney.

Reverend_Hellh0und · 07-23-08, 12:54 PM

I see you have run out of things to say. This is good. Maybe now that you hit rock bottom you can rise like the phoenix into legitmate discourse instead of this sophomoric game you play.

tally ho good chap. (or how do you say that in a cockny brogue?

)

DeeJayH · 07-23-08, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und

I see you have run out of things to say. This is good. Maybe now that you hit rock bottom you can rise like the phoenix into legitmate discourse instead of this sophomoric game you play.

tally ho good chap. (or how do you say that in a cockny brogue?

)

and your favorite beverage awaits you

Scucca · 07-23-08, 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und

I see you have run out of things to say. This is good. Maybe now that you hit rock bottom you can rise like the phoenix into legitmate discourse instead of this sophomoric game you play.

tally ho good chap. (or how do you say that in a cockny brogue?

)

Oh gosh, there was me thinking you'd finally found that article to reject my hypothesis. I'm way too friendly

Reverend_Hellh0und · 07-23-08, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scucca

Oh gosh, there was me thinking you'd finally found that article to reject my hypothesis.

already have. you play games.

Quote:

I'm way too friendly

Your promiscuity is not my concern.

Scucca · 07-23-08, 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und

already have.

Please don't talk rot, it isn't a spiffing thing to do. You have provided general media bias publications that have not met the basic requirements needed to test the hypothesis.

I know your tactics will now be to ignore that basic error.

Sir Loin · 07-23-08, 01:12 PM

Reverend_Hellh0und · 07-23-08, 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scucca

Please don't talk rot, it isn't a spiffing thing to do.

BWAHAHHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAAAA.....

Dood you talk like mary poppins. You would make a good party trick at my next bbq. Wanna come?

Quote:

You have provided general media bias publications that have not met the basic requirements needed to test the hypothesis.

REALLY? Even the last one that referenced your own study in its thesis? WOW you are blind.

Quote:

I know your tactics will now be to ignore that basic error.

Wow so what is it again where you set up a fake issue, then attack the poster on that fake issue? hmmm, I think it's some kinda fallacy of some... sort.....

Scucca · 07-23-08, 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und

Even the last one that referenced your own study in its thesis? WOW you are blind.

Only you would think that a reference to the paper I've already used can be used to reject my hypothesis.

You have a simple task:

"This [blank] left wing establishment, according to the paper by [blank] published in the journal [blank], finds that the democrat vote increases by [blank] percent"

Fill in the blanks!

Reverend_Hellh0und · 07-23-08, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scucca

Only you would think that a reference to the paper I've already used can be used to reject my hypothesis.

You have a simple task:

"This [blank] left wing establishment, according to the paper by [blank] published in the journal [blank], finds that the democrat vote increases by [blank] percent"

Fill in the blanks!

BWHAHAHABAHHAHAHHAHAAAA

Lets set up such a fine requirement in order to hide an intellectual disadvantage that is so sorely obvious to anyone who responds to you.

Anyone can see that my links completley oblitereate your purposeful obtuseness and your willfull ignorance regarding left wing bias in media and its effect on voting.

I gave you all the information you need. The fact that you are still having trouble reflects poorly on you, no one else.