Originally Posted by Redress

I doubt I would go as far as perpetual, but it is frequent. Note that it does, less frequently, go the other way too. You right wingers need more film makers to balance things.

Originally Posted by aquapub

Unlike the 9/11 documentary though, the outrages here are substantive and central to the viewer verdict. Democrat incompetence and spinelessness really did set 9/11 in motion and make it inevitable.

Originally Posted by UtahBill

I have read a lot about the media, especially Hollywood, being mostly lefties, so if this movie is done by them, surely it will come out that the repulsive republicans (led by master manipulator/liar Karl Rove) are the ones who stole an election, and then led us into a war against Iraq using terrorism as a cover story while the real reason is the shrub wanted to redeem his pop's mistake of stopping the first war before it was really over.
History will not be kind to the bush family, and deservedly so.
That being said, I voted for both of them, and will hold my nose and vote for McShame. The democrats haven't fielded a viable candidate since William Jefferson Clinton....

Originally Posted by aquapub

Yeah, Disney Villain conspiracy theories and psychobabble about Bush and his father are much more reasonable explanations for why we removed a terror-sponsoring anti-American regime obssessed with WMD and infamous for using WMD to commit mass murder. It couldn't possibly just be that 9/11 made regimes like Saddam's with 15 years of failed diplomacy under their belt intolerable.

Originally Posted by aquapub

1) Katherine Harris pushed for a statewide recount.

Originally Posted by UtahBill

Saddam did not have WMD, but he did want Iran to think he did.

Originally Posted by UtahBill

And Saddam's connections to world wide terrorism has not been proven to be near the level of the Saudis.

Originally Posted by Doc Howl

Harris certified that the Republican candidate, then-Texas Governor George W. Bush, had defeated the Democratic candidate, then-Vice President Al Gore, in the popular vote of Florida and thus certified the Republican slate of electors. Her ruling was challenged and overturned on appeal by Florida's Supreme Court;

Originally Posted by aquapub

Newsflash: If Gore were in office, the economy would have never recovered from the left's al Qaida mess when 9/11 still happened (because he would not have responded to the economic free fall by cutting taxes and turning things around). Similarly, Katrina still would have happened (and their wouldn't be a Republican in office to blame for Democrat incompetence), corporate scandals still would have happened, the gas prices caused by Democrats would be even higher (from those gas tax hikes they still advocate to this day), frivolous lawsuits (protected by Democrats) would still be wrecking the health care system, amnesty would have already been granted to the economy-raping hordes invading our country from below, unions would still be sending our jobs overseas, and most importantly, there would no longer be prosperity from a tech boom for Democrats to take credit for while working against it at every turn, delaying the natural consequences of economically suicidal Democrat policies (see, the Clinton Recession).

Originally Posted by aquapub

Unless you count the hundreds of shells of mustard gas, sarin gas, the vials of botulism, the cyanide, and enough Uranium to make dozens of dirty bombs...and whatever he was able to get rid of during the 9 month head start we gave him before invading, sure.
Which is irrelevant, since the Saudis are working with us, fighting al Qaida. Liberals seriously need to figure out whether they want America groveling for the approval of our allies or attacking them. The contradictions are becoming a bit persistent.

Originally Posted by aquapub

When Gore came out only wanting to recount the 4 most liberal counties, a statewide recount was the counter-offer.