Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives New York Times Omits for Obama; Don't think their kneepads don't say "Obama '08" on them?... Check this out...Bigass crowd I'...

 
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-21-08, 03:11 PM   2 links from elsewhere to this Post. Click to view. #1 (permalink)
Major General Big Lug

 
cnredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: 11-06-08 05:01 PM
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Posts: 8,719
Thanks: 3
Thanked 115 Times in 43 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

New York Times Omits for Obama

Don't think their kneepads don't say "Obama '08" on them?...

Check this out...Bigass crowd I'd say...



Obama Draws Huge Crowd in Oregon as Clinton Courts Kentucky

Quote:
Senator Barack Obama drew the largest crowd of his campaign so far on Sunday, addressing an estimated 75,000 people who had gathered here on the banks of the Willamette River.

Wow! Wow! Wow!” were his first words as he surveyed the multitude, which included people in kayaks and small pleasure craft on the river on an unseasonably hot day in Oregon.

It is “fair to say this is the most spectacular setting for the most spectacular crowd” of his campaign, he told the audience. His wife and daughters, who have been with him most of the weekend, joined him on the stage at the beginning of the event but left as he was about to speak.
Now remember...The headline says "Obama draws huge crowd" and the first sentence of the article reads "Senator Barack Obama drew the largest crowd of his campaign so far on Sunday"...

But was that REALLY the reason everyone showed up...

(I'll give you a hint...The answer rhymes with "Dell Mo!")...

Now let's see the REAL reason for such a crowd...

The Decemberists, Barack Obama Team for PDX Rally

Quote:
And look who's arrived to give Obama the extra push he needs to get on the ballot in November. Why, it's none other than those kings and queens of the month after, the Decemberists!

Singin' Colin Meloy, Chris Funk, Jenny Conlee, Nate Query, and recent solo-flyer John Moen will join the Obama-non himself for a free rally at the Bowl at Portland's Waterfront Park this Sunday, May 18. Gates open at 12:30 p.m. PDX time. For more info and RSVP details, head here.

Apart from this bit of politicking, the Decemberists have only one other show coming up: a sweater-tuggers' love-in with Death Cab for Cutie and Rogue Wave in Bend, Oregon later this month.

Obamaists:

05-18 Portland, OR - The Bowl at Waterfront Park (Barack Obama Rally) *
So now we find that this was ALSO a free concert played by the Decemberists, which is a major label band who hails from?...You got it!...Portland, Oregon!...



Now I have NO problem with having a band coming out for their candidate and holding a free show...

What I DO have a problem with is when the media DOESN'T REPORT IT and tells the public that the ONLY reason there were 75,000 in the park that day was Obama and NOT that there was a free concert held by a popular hometown band...
__________________


www.politicalwrinkles.com
cnredd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 05-21-08, 03:14 PM   #2 (permalink)
Advisor
 
azura28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Last Online: 11-21-08 07:13 PM
Location: landlocked U.S.A.
Posts: 503
Thanks: 308
Thanked 143 Times in 104 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Female

Current Mood:
Fine
Re: New York Times Omits for Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by cnredd View Post
Don't think their kneepads don't say "Obama '08" on them?...

Check this out...Bigass crowd I'd say...



Obama Draws Huge Crowd in Oregon as Clinton Courts Kentucky

Now remember...The headline says "Obama draws huge crowd" and the first sentence of the article reads "Senator Barack Obama drew the largest crowd of his campaign so far on Sunday"...

But was that REALLY the reason everyone showed up...

(I'll give you a hint...The answer rhymes with "Dell Mo!")...

Now let's see the REAL reason for such a crowd...

The Decemberists, Barack Obama Team for PDX Rally



So now we find that this was ALSO a free concert played by the Decemberists, which is a major label band who hails from?...You got it!...Portland, Oregon!...



Now I have NO problem with having a band coming out for their candidate and holding a free show...

What I DO have a problem with is when the media DOESN'T REPORT IT and tells the public that the ONLY reason there were 75,000 in the park that day was Obama and NOT that there was a free concert held by a popular hometown band...
Excellent post, and no....this has not been noted by anyone in the main media. I can't imagine why?
azura28 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-21-08, 03:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
Doctor of Metaphysics


 
dclxvinoise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Last Online: Today 01:24 AM
Location: Montana
Posts: 2,402
Thanks: 334
Thanked 632 Times in 387 Posts
Gender: Male

Re: New York Times Omits for Obama

I could see your point if the event were billed as a Decemberists concert, with Obama as a special guest. However, it was an Obama rally with The Decemberists as a special guest. It's rather arrogant to assume that the crowd was so huge solely because The Decemberists were there. I'm not saying that you are assuming this, but I also don't think that the New York Times were trying to deceive anyone by not including that information. By the way, The Decemberists are popular for an indie band, but I don't think they normally draw crowds like that.

Regardless, when Obama showed up in Bozeman Montana the other day, the event was completely sold out. It was billed as a rally and Michael Keaton showed up as a surprise guest. Nobody knew that he was going to be there. I'm not saying that is what happened with this event, but one should consider all possibilities before drawing conclusions.
dclxvinoise is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-21-08, 04:14 PM   #4 (permalink)
Major General Big Lug

 
cnredd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: 11-06-08 05:01 PM
Location: Philadelphia,PA
Posts: 8,719
Thanks: 3
Thanked 115 Times in 43 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male

Thread Starter Re: New York Times Omits for Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by dclxvinoise View Post
I could see your point if the event were billed as a Decemberists concert, with Obama as a special guest. However, it was an Obama rally with The Decemberists as a special guest. It's rather arrogant to assume that the crowd was so huge solely because The Decemberists were there. I'm not saying that you are assuming this, but I also don't think that the New York Times were trying to deceive anyone by not including that information. By the way, The Decemberists are popular for an indie band, but I don't think they normally draw crowds like that.

Regardless, when Obama showed up in Bozeman Montana the other day, the event was completely sold out. It was billed as a rally and Michael Keaton showed up as a surprise guest. Nobody knew that he was going to be there. I'm not saying that is what happened with this event, but one should consider all possibilities before drawing conclusions.
Here's a report on another show they did...Over 1,000 miles away from their hometown...in Chicago...

Quote:
The free Decemberists show last night at Millenium Park was pretty stunning. I didn't even mind the light rain, which actually fit in pretty well with the mood of the music. The Decemberists' music translated wonderfully with the orchestra, the sound was amazing, they played songs from every album- and best of all, we heard it all for free in a beautiful park against the backdrop of the city skyline while chilling on a blanket drinking wine- seriously, it doesn't get any better than that. Chicago rules, basically. I was pretty blown away by the crowd; we were lucky enough to get a good spot on the lawn, but people were spilling out all over the grass and sidewalk well outside the pavillion.
And here's a picture of that concert...



Now if that's what they get over 1,000 miles from home, I would THINK you could comprehend that the hometown crowd would be even larger...

Secondly, and MUCH more important...

It doesn't matter if 70,000 were there for Obama and 5,000 were there for the Decemberists...or 5,000 were there for Obama and 70,000 were there for the Decemberists...

The point is the fact that the Decemberists WEREN'T EVEN MENTIONED is a lie of omission...The NYT intentionally left that aspect out making it appear that ALL of the people were there strictly for Obama and no other reason...
cnredd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-21-08, 07:47 PM   #5 (permalink)
BWG
Professor

 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Last Online: 11-21-08 01:58 PM
Location: Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,388
Thanks: 4
Thanked 188 Times in 114 Posts
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Air Force:  Served honerably from 1968-1972 with 1 year tour in S.E. Asia 1969-1970 

Re: New York Times Omits for Obama

Here is another photo from the show from Millenium Park in Chicago...


Quote:
While there were hundreds, nay, thousands, of Decemberists fans on the lawn, many of the up-close patrons, holders of Grant Park Music Festival memberships, were clearly unfamiliar with the band, and we noticed quite a few opting to leave after only a couple of songs.

Chicagoist: ReViewed: The Decemberists with the Grant Park Orchestra

First you say that the media "tells the public that the ONLY reason there were 75,000 in the park that day was Obama". Nowhere does the article say anything about the ONLY reason...ONLY was emphasized twice in the OP. In fact, for those that can't read the article because you need a password, the only thing it says about the crowd is quoted in post #1.

Second you say "Now let's see the REAL reason for such a crowd..." and the link you provide has no proof that the free concert was the REAL reason for the crowd. (What is the readership of 'pitchforkmedia.com' anyway?)



Ok, this is just a poster on a site (just like you or I) so take from it what you will. But apparently he didn't see the 'pitchforkmedia.com' promo...LOL
(I actually tried to find a flyer or invitation to see how the event was promoted, but no luck)

Quote:
I know this is all in good cheeky fun- but I was at the rally and own a lot of Decembrists records and can positively attest that no one knew the Decembrists were playing. We walked during 16 Military Wives (so yes they did play it Mr Geraghty)and thought it was just canned background music. An entire song passed before we realized that it was the actual band on stage. In fact, never once in the 2 1/2 hours I stood in line was the word "Decembrist" even mentioned and it was nowhere to be found on any of the invitations that brought me there in the first place.

To sum up: I know the Decembrists, I like the Decembrists, but I sure as hell am not standing in a 25 block long line for close to three hours just to see them play at Waterfront Park for free (especially when I don't even know it's an option). Now to hear a 45 minute long stump speech by some politician...
__________________
Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.
BWG is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-22-08, 07:02 PM   #6 (permalink)
Make the stupidness stop
Mod team member

 
Zyphlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Today 12:43 AM
Location: Herndon, Va
Posts: 4,883
Thanks: 1,767
Thanked 1,882 Times in 1,130 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender: Male

Awards:
Moderation Team:  Thank you!! 

Re: New York Times Omits for Obama

By "only" that means no other reasons were given. If you are told people are here for "X" reason....and that's it...then you're being told that's the only reason. Why? Because there's no other listed reason.

Why the Decembrists along may not be the reason why EVERYONE was there, it is highly likely to think that logically a group that attracts large numbers elsewhere is likely to attract a large number in their home town and thus had at least some what of an affect on that number. If that's the case, attributing all 75,000 to Obama is dishonest.
__________________
Obama Wins. Time to reach for the new American Dream: "Strive for Mediocrity, avoid success, get free crap"
Zyphlin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-22-08, 07:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
Secret Blogger
Dungeon Master


 
independent_thinker2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: 11-20-08 04:47 PM
Location: Nation of Whiners
Posts: 19,682
Thanks: 4,358
Thanked 2,651 Times in 1,898 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Devilish
Re: New York Times Omits for Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
By "only" that means no other reasons were given. If you are told people are here for "X" reason....and that's it...then you're being told that's the only reason. Why? Because there's no other listed reason.

Why the Decembrists along may not be the reason why EVERYONE was there, it is highly likely to think that logically a group that attracts large numbers elsewhere is likely to attract a large number in their home town and thus had at least some what of an affect on that number. If that's the case, attributing all 75,000 to Obama is dishonest.
Hillary should have called out the Stones.

Then she could get the British vote like she did with Elton John.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navy Pride View Post
Hell I could probably beat McCain.....
==]:{o
independent_thinker2002 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-22-08, 08:19 PM   #8 (permalink)
Pianos are Pretty

 
FallingPianos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Last Online: 11-18-08 12:16 AM
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 3,262
Thanks: 133
Thanked 170 Times in 115 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Female

Re: New York Times Omits for Obama

I was there.

I found out about the rally via an e-mail from the obama campaign:

Quote:
Please join Barack Obama for a rally in Portland, where he'll talk about his vision for bringing America together and creating the kind of change we can believe in.

Rally with Barack Obama

The Bowl
Waterfront Park
Corner of SW Columbia St. and SW Naito Pkwy.
South of the Hawthorne Bridge

Sunday, May 18th, 2008
Doors Open: 12:30 p.m.

RSVP now

Barack Obama : : Change We Can Believe In | Rally with Barack Obama in Portland

The event is free and open to the public. Tickets are not required, but an RSVP is strongly encouraged. Admission is on a first-come, first-served basis.

For security reasons, do not bring bags. Please limit personal items. No signs or banners permitted.
the decemberists were not mentioned.

I waited in line for about 2 hours before even getting into the park, and all of the talk was about seeing obama. not a single person mentioned that the decemberists were going to be there.

I didn't find out the decemberists were there until I heard them playing music as I walked into the park.

the decemberists finished their show about 90 minutes before obama came on stage. people didn't start leaving with them.

I can assure you that the decemberists were not what drew 72,000 people to the park that day.


I'll add that when you click on the link, it does say "Special Guest Performance by: Colin Meloy, Chris Funk, Jenny Conlee, Nate Query, and John Moen". only the biggest decemberists fans will even know who those people are.
__________________
<a href=http://www.pianodreamer.com/gallery2/index.php?album=misc&image=bipride.jpg target=_blank>http://www.pianodreamer.com/gallery2...ge=bipride.jpg</a>

Last edited by FallingPianos : 05-22-08 at 08:21 PM.
FallingPianos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-22-08, 11:38 PM   #9 (permalink)
Professor


 
donc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Last Online: Yesterday 10:35 PM
Location: west
Posts: 1,385
Thanks: 248
Thanked 216 Times in 173 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

Awards:
US Marines:  in marine corps from 6/66-7/70 

Re: New York Times Omits for Obama

Here’s the headliner for a McCain rally.


YouTube - Snake Handling Church Service
donc is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 05-23-08, 06:20 AM   #10 (permalink)
aps
Passionate


 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: Today 07:46 AM
Posts: 10,854
Thanks: 2,674
Thanked 1,245 Times in 845 Posts
Lean: Liberal
Gender: Female

Re: New York Times Omits for Obama

Quote:
Originally Posted by FallingPianos View Post
I was there.

I found out about the rally via an e-mail from the obama campaign:



the decemberists were not mentioned.

I waited in line for about 2 hours before even getting into the park, and all of the talk was about seeing obama. not a single person mentioned that the decemberists were going to be there.

I didn't find out the decemberists were there until I heard them playing music as I walked into the park.

the decemberists finished their show about 90 minutes before obama came on stage. people didn't start leaving with them.

I can assure you that the decemberists were not what drew 72,000 people to the park that day.


I'll add that when you click on the link, it does say "Special Guest Performance by: Colin Meloy, Chris Funk, Jenny Conlee, Nate Query, and John Moen". only the biggest decemberists fans will even know who those people are.
Thank you for debunking the point of this thread.
aps is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/archives/31846-new-york-times-omits-obama.html
Posted By For Type Date
My new WordPress MU Site » Blog Archive » New York Times Omits for Obama This thread Pingback 05-21-08 05:00 PM
New York Times Omits for Obama This thread Pingback 05-21-08 04:57 PM

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABC, CBS Refuse to Air Anti-Obama Ad aquapub Archives 29 05-02-08 01:06 PM
The Times Tells The Truth!!! gordontravels Archives 11 09-11-05 06:44 PM
Osama, the President and the New York Times!!! gordontravels Archives 4 08-18-05 02:41 PM
Kristol: N.Y. Times and CBS 'Conspiring' With Kerry to Defeat Bush vauge Archives 0 10-27-04 03:06 PM
Bin Laden Aims to Attack U.S. This Year - NY Times vauge Archives 3 07-13-04 09:14 PM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Captain America
· · ·
Member Galleries
988 photos
217 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO