Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism - Page 11

Sir Loin · 09-17-08, 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pull My Finger

The title, scope, and date of the study are there for everyone to see. It’s the first thing you see when you click on the link.

Yes indeed, what exactly about the subject of the study about the Iraq war did you think was related to the claim you chose to respond to?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pull My Finger

You asked if there was a study, and there was. Somehow, I knew you’d dislike it… I would bet my testicles that if a study were done tomorrow the results would still be the same – you pick the subject.

Somehow you knew your link to an unrelated study from 2003 about the Iraq war would not be met with applause? You’re Nostradamus ye are. Chuckle.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pull My Finger

All you have to know about is the FOX Internal Memos to know that not only is FOX biased, but clearly has an agenda to support the neo-con Repubs, and smear anything else that doesn’t tow the party line – including normal Conservatives who FOX touts as Liberals…

All anyone needs know is that your agenda lead you to try and pull the exact kind of lazy arsed bullshizzle you’re supposedly crying about. It is called “misrepresentation” and there truly is something so delicious about trying to misrepresent a study on the Iraq war as something it aint, five lame years later. But that is what you get when you troll.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pull My Finger

Try telling a FOX lover, and it’s like you slapped their mama… Such devotion to a network that takes you for a ****ing fool… It makes me , , and feel for them…

Peace

What next, ya wanna hook us up with a study on goat testicles and claim it is about “Fox News misrepresents more than anyone else”..bah…bah..bah?

ADK_Forever · 09-17-08, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Navy Pride

How do you explain FOX always winning the ratings war since there are a lot more liberals then there are conservatives?

People love to watch car accidents too. Doesn't mean they support them.

I listen to that Neanderthal Hannity almost every day on the way home from work, only because it's the only talk show that I get at that time of day. I'll time myself to see how long I can stay tuned. Sometimes he is soooo adolescent I just have to switch. What I do find interesting is when he tries to convince his Repub guests to agree with his extreme views and even they have to disagree with all his twists and turns. Some who have had to straighten him out have been: Giuliani, Rove, McCain, Gingrich and Pat Buchanan. Even that crowd doesn't drink his kool-aid.

ADK_Forever · 09-17-08, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sir Loin

man up.

I'm right here, lay yer best on me.

Want a True debate on the "journalistic" history of Fox News (less than 12 years old) versus the history of CNN and the Fox competitors, hey do it bring troll....do bring it.

Hey Loin,

I must have missed your post this morning. Somehow I must not have thought it memorable. Can't imagine why.

Stop beating yer chest.

"You" may live in a cave and feel righteous enough to ignore the facts on Fox Noise. That's your problem. Plenty of Repubs and even Conservatives, that I know and on this forum, think that org only makes them look bad.

I certainly won't devote one minute to debating whether or not that rag has any journalistic merit. That would be akin to debating that the Sun rises in the east every morning. You know, a waste of time.

However, if you can't hold your water, feel free to spew your reasons why you think anything about that rag comes anywhere in the same universe as either a journalistic or news organization. Go ahead, puke away. I won't even make fun of what you're drinking, ok?

Sir Loin · 09-17-08, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ADK_Forever

Hey Loin,

I must have missed your post this morning. Somehow I must not have thought it memorable. Can't imagine why.

Stop beating yer chest.

"You" may live in a cave and feel righteous enough to ignore the facts on Fox Noise. That's your problem. Plenty of Repubs and even Conservatives, that I know and on this forum, think that org only makes them look bad.

I certainly won't devote one minute to debating whether or not that rag has any journalistic merit. That would be akin to debating that the Sun rises in the east every morning. You know, a waste of time.

However, if you can't hold your water, feel free to spew your reasons why you think anything about that rag comes anywhere in the same universe as either a journalistic or news organization. Go ahead, puke away. I won't even make fun of what you're drinking, ok?

Yip I was right, I’ve already seen your best….which aint saying much. I note that you don’t feel comfortable debating your “stance” too. Who knew? Chuckle.

Hard to actually do any part time debating when you have full time trolling to do eh?