• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Slimy Baltimore FOX Affiliate Caught Faking "Kill a Cop" Protest Chant (1 Viewer)

Frim his yob man. :doh
You have no point.

Hopefully this firing leads to a professional analyses.
There is no need for professional analysis because most of know she didn't say "kill a cop", she said "killer cop."
 
There is no need for professional analysis because most of know she didn't say "kill a cop", she said "killer cop."
And you would be wrong again, as she clearly did.
Had she not said both, the chanters would not have replied with both.
 
And you would be wrong again, as she clearly did.
Had she not said both, the chanters would not have replied with both.
It doesn't really matter. The same types were chanting for "Dead Cops" in an earlier parade, and in Ferguson, so it's not like they are driven snow.

They certainly try to make a big deal of their innocence this time around.
 
First- the chant is "kill a cop"
Second- the two officers gunned down by a spineless worm were Asian and Hispanic
Third - so one conclude the blacks chanting "kill a cop' will kill black cops as well as all other races. Damn! I wish I could get their resumes to see how far in school they went and what types of careers they have.
 
First- the chant is "kill a cop"
Second- the two officers gunned down by a spineless worm were Asian and Hispanic
Third - so one conclude the blacks chanting "kill a cop' will kill black cops as well as all other races. Damn! I wish I could get their resumes to see how far in school they went and what types of careers they have.

Wrong, the chant is "killer cops" which was led by a black woman whose brother was killed by cops in Baltimore. She is seeking justice for the cop who killed her brother, not to kill them. The chant was “We won’t stop/we can’t stop/’til killer cops/are in cell blocks.”
 
Wrong, the chant is "killer cops" which was led by a black woman whose brother was killed by cops in Baltimore. She is seeking justice for the cop who killed her brother, not to kill them. The chant was “We won’t stop/we can’t stop/’til killer cops/are in cell blocks.”
Wrong. She said both.
 
Wrong. She said both.

I am not wrong by your admission that she said both. I think its clear her intent was to say "killer cops" not "kill a cops."
 
It doesn't really matter. The same types were chanting for "Dead Cops" in an earlier parade, and in Ferguson, so it's not like they are driven snow.

They certainly try to make a big deal of their innocence this time around.

"Those people," eh?
 
You can't quote properly even when there are just three words involved! Remarkable!

You being purposely obtuse now. I guess that's what we get after 10+ pages you trying to tell people that this woman said something even the OP admitted didn't make any sense as he described it. However, since I'm feeling generous, I'll let you read up. They're regularly used in the English language.

Scare quotes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scare quotes or shudder quotes are quotation marks placed around a word or phrase to imply that it may not signify its apparent meaning or that it is not necessarily the way the quoting person would express its concept. The quotes serve a function similar to verbally prefixing a phrase with "so-called". When referred to as "scare quotes", the quotation marks are suggested to imply skepticism of or disagreement with the quoted terminology.

Tell us again about how you've mastered the English language.
 
You being purposely obtuse now. I guess that's what we get after 10+ pages you trying to tell people that this woman said something even the OP admitted didn't make any sense as he described it. However, since I'm feeling generous, I'll let you read up. They're regularly used in the English language.

Scare quotes - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Tell us again about how you've mastered the English language.

So you divined that Kobie was using "scare quotes", huh? Did he send you a message to that effect?
 
So you divined that Kobie was using "scare quotes", huh? Did he send you a message to that effect?

???

Why on earth would I do that?

Given that I clearly wasn't directly quoting you, what the **** did you think I was doing?
 
"...In a series of studies in 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger..." - See more at: How facts backfire - The Boston Globe

http://www.dartmouth.edu/~nyhan/nyhan-reifler.pdf

:naughty
Me though? I have been honest about what was said. She said both. Which is confirmed by what was repeated.
Do you really not understand that? The chanters would not have repeated it had she not said it.
And the station matters not to what she actually said.
They have had it analyzed.

Frim his yob man. :doh
You have no point.
Hopefully this firing leads to a professional analyses.

And you would be wrong again, as she clearly did.
Had she not said both, the chanters would not have replied with both.

Wrong. She said both.

:doh
Yes, you are wrong.

Hilarious, absolutely hilarious:lamo :lamo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
 
:laughat:
So smug, so wrong...so we're laughing at you
This isn't about me, or did you not know that?
But you are wrong.
She said both.
The chanters replied with both.
They would not have replied with it if they had not heard it.
Do you really not get that?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom