If you are on the left and you are to appear on Fox News you will be a defendant
No more than the conservative is a "defendent" of their position.
If you are on the right you will be agreed with and praised.
Depends which of the host is speaking at the moment as opposed to MSNBC which always opposed conservative view points the few times they have them on.
It's how it is, and it pleases their viewers. Fox News is good at it and they make huge amounts of money because of it.
What please their veiwers, who are only 30% conservative, is seeing both sides presented equally, that's why they grew like they did with a broad audience as opposed to the others which give one sided views and can't even compete.
All news stations have opposing guests from political parties.
Those in charge lied about why the attorney's were fired
No one has been shown to have lied.
and now NO ONE can remember why they were fired or who directed the firing.
Reasons don't have to be given. They are normally rotated out anyway to let someone else take the position. We don't want US Attorney's building little fifedoms with the power they have.
That right there is just cause for an investigation.
No it's not, they serve at the pleasure of the President, what don't you understand about that?
The investigation was to find if there was obstruction of justice.
Oh another one of those, when you can't get your political opponent on a crime, then get them in a perjury trap.
There was no justice to obstruct.
The obstruction being firing the attorney's to stop them from prosecuting corrupt politicians of a specific political party.
Something which the Democrats were unable to prove and none of the fired attorneys were able to show that to be true.
If it is not the concern of the justice department to prosecute members of the government for corruption and illegal affairs who's is it?
Bring the charge. Who has made it and where is the evidence.
The firings were under investigation as being illegal politics from the right.
Allegations that were totally made up.
If the President fires attorney's because those attorney's are investigating corruption into the President's political allies, that is obstruction of justice.
Who made that charge, which investigation was obstructed?
If a Republican President appoints attorneys, he/she cannot tell them "While I am President you can only investigation Democratic corruption".
And your evidence Bush did that? Hmmmmm seems to me they have been investigating Republicans.
You may feel the ability for the President to have such an agenda is a "good" government.
You may feel the ability of Democrats to bring bogus charges in order to get their political opponents thrown in jail good government, I don't.
I personally believe a non-partisan government is better for America then a partisan one.
Then how can you possibly defend the Gonzalez thing which is totally a bogus partisan witch hunt?
