NY Times Directly Aided The Enemy - Page 17

mpg · 08-06-06, 02:40 PM

I'm 100% behind mdoernizing and cleaning up our voting system to make it more accurate, but show where the GAO said that Bush stole the election.

aquapub · 08-07-06, 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bizznych

The government accounting office is far left wing?You're a joke.Don't waste my time with reactionary crap with no basis in fact.I guess the "liberal media" did not report on the gao report did it?Again aquqpud.you have made a fool of yourself.Please dispute the G.A.O. report if you can,Hardly a "left wing website".

Maybe I missed this GAO link you supposedly posted because none of this conspiracy theory crap you are peddling has anything to do with this thread, but all I saw were left wing web sites among your sources.

aquapub · 08-07-06, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bizznych

Show me in the constitution where it says the Supreme court can stop a recount before you spew anymore hate mongering nazi bull****.

What a calm, intelligent commentary.

Um...I'm pretty sure the Supreme Court has the power to stop a notoriously activist, left-wing state court from changing the rules during an election to manufacture votes and steal an election.

I thought you were still talking about the 2004 conspiracy theory. Not that any of this belongs in this thread.

aquapub · 08-07-06, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bizznych

Rubin analyzed portions of Diebold software source code that was mistakenly left on a public Internet site and concluded that a teenager could manufacture "smart" cards and vote several times. Further, he said, insiders could program the machine to alter election results without detection. All machines had the same password hard-wired into the code. And in some instances, it was set at 1111, a number laughably easy to hack, Rubin said.

Because there is no paper or electronic auditing system in the machine, there would be no way to reconstruct an actual vote, he said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...nguage=printer
See this Pud boy?It's from the Washington post!!!!!!!!!!Too "left wing "still?,I have plenty more sources for you.You are incapable of logic it seems,and I am going to make your time here(at D.P.) a living hell.

This article is talking about a report which the Washington Post even admits, "An outside consultant assured the three-member panel recently that the report was nonsense."

Furthermore, questioning whether Virginia's gubernatorial race had some irregularities due to electronic voting machines hardly establishes that Ohio was stolen.

Nice try.

aquapub · 08-07-06, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpg

I'm 100% behind mdoernizing and cleaning up our voting system to make it more accurate, but show where the GAO said that Bush stole the election.

It probably doesn't. You're dealing with a hysteric and conspiracy theorist. Facts and evidence are immaterial.