• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

James O'Keefe Punks NPR

X Factor

Anti-Socialist
Dungeon Master
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2010
Messages
61,616
Reaction score
32,231
Location
El Paso Strong
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Here's the video;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xd9OYJMX9t4&feature=youtube_gdata_player

And here's the story (ironically, from NPR)

NPR's soon-to-be-departing senior vice president for fundraising Ron Schiller is seen and heard on a videotape released this morning telling two men who were posing as members of a fictitious Muslim Action Education Center that:

— "The Tea Party is fanatically involved in people's personal lives and very fundamental Christian — I wouldn't even call it Christian. It's this weird evangelical kind of move."

— "Tea Party people" aren't "just Islamaphobic, but really xenophobic, I mean basically they are, they believe in sort of white, middle-America gun-toting. I mean, it's scary. They're seriously racist, racist people."

— "I think what we all believe is if we don't have Muslim voices in our schools, on the air ... it's the same thing we faced as a nation when we didn't have female voices." In the heavily edited tape, that comment followed Schiller being told by one of the men that their organization "was originally founded by a few members of the Muslim Brotherhood in America." There's no sign in the edited tape that Schiller reacted in any way after being told of the group's alleged connection to an Islamic group that appeared to be connected with Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood.

— That NPR "would be better off in the long run without federal funding," a position in direct conflict with the organization's official position.

Schiller is also heard laughing when one of the men jokes that NPR should be known as "National Palestinian Radio."

NPR, as you'll see below, has called Schiller's comments appalling.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way...ms-tea-party-questions-need-for-federal-funds

None of this surprises me.
 
Last edited:
NPR thinks we should have 'Muslim voices in our schools'...2:10 of the video.

Every time someone wants a Christian voice in our schools, they gets slammed down with 'separation of church and state'.


3:10 the NPR guy calls the entire Republican party racist.
 
Last edited:
And we publicly fund this garbage?

I especially like the part where he basically says we don't have enough "elite"-ly educated people, as if he's on the verge of curing cancer or solving the Middle East crisis.

That's that so-called liberal elites do; they sit around tell each other how smart they are while none of them accomplish a thing.
 
Why in the name of all things are the taxpayers funding this crap?
 
How is the tea party "very involved in people's personal lives"?
 
Speaking of punks, why is it that y'all give O'Keefe one iota of credibility and attention? Why do you allow yourselves to be punked by this lying sack of **** criminal, time-and-time again? It's beyond me how little we ask from those who would inform us.
 
I have very little respect for O'Keefe's brand of "journalism," and I'd submit that ANY organization of decent size could be tainted in a similar fashion.

What exactly is NPR accused of? Employing someone with opinions?
 
I have very little respect for O'Keefe's brand of "journalism," and I'd submit that ANY organization of decent size could be tainted in a similar fashion.

What exactly is NPR accused of? Employing someone with opinions?

Do you feel that way about Micheal Moore?
 
The title of this thread should be "James O'Keefe Punks Ron Schiller." Seriously!!
 
I personally love NPR and the material I get from it, but I disagreed with the Juan Williams firing and Schilling's comments here were completely out of line, not to mention out of touch with reality.

You're in denial dude.

Trent Lott was admiring Thurmond for his participation in the Klan, The GOP is supported by a lot of racists.
 

There's no telling how many people this ****wad called until he finally found someone dumb enough to give him clips of what he wanted. I'm all for getting rid of funding for NPR, as I could care less about them, but how anyone still listens to James O'keefe is beyond me. I take everything he ever says for all eternity as a lie until he fully proves what he claims with full length videos or audio clips and much needed scrutiny. Anyone that takes what he says at face value is a buffoon.
 
Why in the name of all things are the taxpayers funding this crap?

Let's be clear that delusional rant of one individual, or even a few incidents, doesn't even come close to indicting the entire NPR organization. The quality of their journalism is still first-rate.
 
Do you feel that way about Micheal Moore?

Do you? Michael Moore is rabidly partisan. His partisanship makes his conclusions suspect. He's no journalist.

Real journalists give their subjects a chance to speak on their own behalf. Real journalists don't misrepresent themselves except under extremely controlled conditions, and then they at least offer a chance for a thorough rebuttal. Real journalists don't start with a conclusion and work backward.
 
Last edited:
You're in denial dude.

Trent Lott was admiring Thurmond for his participation in the Klan, The GOP is supported by a lot of racists.

Yes, and those people represent the entire conservative movement and Tea party :roll:

Let's go over his comments again, shall we?

"The Tea Party is fanatically involved in people's personal lives and very fundamental Christian — I wouldn't even call it Christian. It's this weird evangelical kind of move."

NOT REALITY

"Tea Party people" aren't "just Islamaphobic, but really xenophobic, I mean basically they are, they believe in sort of white, middle-America gun-toting. I mean, it's scary. They're seriously racist, racist people."

GROSS OVERSIMPLIFICATION AND SWEEPING GENERALIZATION

That NPR "would be better off in the long run without federal funding," a position in direct conflict with the organization's official position.

Yeah, complete bull****.

Schiller is also heard laughing when one of the men jokes that NPR should be known as "National Palestinian Radio."

I don't even get how that's funny...

Look, I've said many times on this forum that I disagree with a lot of conservative and Tea Party beliefs. I have my personal biases, but I am also fair. All political opinions should be based on REALITY. Not a parallel dimension that is based on stereotypes and sweeping generalizations.
 
Last edited:
Let's be clear that delusional rant of one individual, or even a few incidents, doesn't even come close to indicting the entire NPR organization. The quality of their journalism is still first-rate.


Who cares?? Taxpayers shouldn't be paying for a radio station. What's next? Taxpayer-funded TV shows? Oh wait....
 
Who cares?? Taxpayers shouldn't be paying for a radio station. What's next? Taxpayer-funded TV shows? Oh wait....

That's a value judgment. If all taxpayers had their own choices there's a lot of things they would feel they shouldn't be paying for. NPR is already underfunded as it is, seeing as they have to engage in these huge donation and membership drives every few months. I personally find a great deal of value in an organization like NPR, much as I'm sure many Britons are very proud of the professional journalistic excellence of the BBC. It says a great deal about our democracy that we can have a government-funded media outlet that's not necessarily controlled by the government and is capable of criticizing it.
 
Last edited:
Do you feel that way about Micheal Moore?

How about you? Is that all you have to say about the OP? Are you one of those that allows themselves to be fooled by the likes of O'Keefe?
 
That's a value judgment. If all taxpayers had their own choices there's a lot of things they would feel they shouldn't be paying for. NPR is already underfunded as it is, seeing has they have to engage in these huge donation and membership drives every few months.

Boo hoo for them.
 
Boo hoo for them.

Well yeah it sucks but we do it because we have a lot of faith in the organization and its professionalism, even if some people within the organization make dumb comments from time to time.
 
Do you? Michael Moore is rabidly partisan. His partisanship makes his conclusions suspect. He's no journalist.

Real journalists give their subjects a chance to speak on their own behalf. Real journalists don't misrepresent themselves except under extremely controlled conditions, and then they at least offer a chance for a thorough rebuttal. Real journalists don't start with a conclusion and work backward.

Perfectly put, GJ.
 
"The fraudulent organization represented in this video repeatedly pressed us to accept a $5 million check, with no strings attached, which we repeatedly refused to accept.

This is a muslim scare video.

"Tea Party people" aren't "just Islamaphobic, but really xenophobic, I mean basically they are, they believe in sort of white, middle-America gun-toting. I mean, it's scary. They're seriously racist, racist people."
As self evidenced by this muslim scare video.

Funny how they try and bait them for a zionist media conspiracy and they don't bite.
 
Well yeah it sucks but we do it because we have a lot of faith in the organization and its professionalism, even if some people within the organization make dumb comments from time to time.

"We" have a lot of faith in the organization and its professionalism? Who is we? I sure don't see NPR as unbiased, therefore, no "faith" here.

And what does "faith in professionalism" have to do with getting taxpayer money? I have faith that my hairdresser will cut everyone's hair to her best ability. Should she be getting taxpayer money as well?
 
Back
Top Bottom