• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Medai Matters lies, always has, always will

Partisan sources calling out partisan sources :mrgreen: Ironic, no?

We should just reinstate the classic 'dual'

McChesney on one side - O'Reilley on the other.
Then Shultz on one side - Beck on the other.

And so on.

Whoever's left after the smoke clear - wins the minds and hearts of all those who don't think but do listen.
 
We should just reinstate the classic 'dual'

McChesney on one side - O'Reilley on the other.
Then Shultz on one side - Beck on the other.

And so on.

Whoever's left after the smoke clear - wins the minds and hearts of all those who don't think but do listen.

Ack, no. I don't want any of them controlling our hearts and minds. **** the talking heads, let's control our own minds. That is the problem with Media Matters, MRC, NewsBusters, Breitbart, Salon, etc, they try and force us to see things their way, and won't stop at dishonesty. Whovian is correct, MM is not reliable, he was just incomplete, and used unreliable sources to prove his point. Irony at its finest.
 
What you have to do Wovian, is gather the evidence and present it yourself, so it takes at least one of the pathetic excuses away that the liberals use to avoid reality. Don't get me wrong here, they will still find other excuses to dismiss the facts... They always do... But by presenting the case yourself, instead of linking to it on a blog, they have to concoct an even more ridiculous lie to weasel out, which is far more entertaining to watch.

What I've found is, they will almost never face up to any facts that contradict their beliefs. It seems to be inherent with the ideology. The thread I just made on Dan Rather proves that conclusively. So you must change the game from "showing them the error in their beliefs", to "making them look as foolish as possible, by forcing them to have to make up the most outrageous lies possible". Unfortunately though, they will most often try and change the topic, or simply run away from the issue. Although that's not nearly as much fun, it can still be entertaining to watch.
 
What you have to do Wovian, is gather the evidence and present it yourself, so it takes at least one of the pathetic excuses away that the liberals use to avoid reality. Don't get me wrong here, they will still find other excuses to dismiss the facts... They always do... But by presenting the case yourself, instead of linking to it on a blog, they have to concoct an even more ridiculous lie to weasel out, which is far more entertaining to watch.
It seems to me, Whovian needs to do a little more than Google Media Matters lies and post the resulting links here. :roll:
 
It seems to me, Whovian needs to do a little more than Google Media Matters lies and post the resulting links here. :roll:

As if Media Matter doesn't do the same thing.... lol
 
I clicked on one link it was Breibart. Should I attack his cred?

Now then attack media matters cred.
 
Love the choice of places to link to to prove your point. MM lies because BigGovernment.com tells me so...

No, MM lies because they are liars. BigGovernment was just one source I happened to link to. As I said, I could go on all night with source after source, but libbies will whine and complain that the sources aren't being fair to their precious liars.
 
Last edited:
No, MM lies because they are liars. BigGovernment was just one source I happened to link to. As I said, I could go on all night with source after source, but libbies will whine and complain that the sources aren't being fair to their precious liars.

I am a "libbie" and don't argue that MM lies. Your sources just are no more reliable, which is what I found amusing.
 
It seems to me, Whovian needs to do a little more than Google Media Matters lies and post the resulting links here. :roll:

Like I said... I could post examples of their lies all night. You and others like you will simply whine, complain, spin, twist, and otherwise try to wriggle out of what the links show is obvious...

Media Matters Lies. Always have... ALWAYS will. And the people who look to them as the Gods of media truthfulness are no better than they.
 
I am a "libbie" and don't argue that MM lies. Your sources just are no more reliable, which is what I found amusing.

Do I 'really' need to spend the next 2 hours posting source after source? Really? Facts are facts, regardless of who provides them. Media Matters does indeed on occasion present actual facts. That does not detract from the many more times they outright lie. If FOX News presents something, and it is indeed factual, would you claim it is a lie, simply because it was FOX? If not, then why do so in this case? Facts... are facts.
 
Do I 'really' need to spend the next 2 hours posting source after source? Really? Facts are facts, regardless of who provides them. Media Matters does indeed on occasion present actual facts. That does not detract from the many more times they outright lie. If FOX News presents something, and it is indeed factual, would you claim it is a lie, simply because it was FOX? If not, then why do so in this case? Facts... are facts.

The same argument could be used for MM though. The issue is not that MM lies(they do), but that lots of websites lie, but you singled out one, while using others as evidence. People should question everything they read on the internet, and partisan sites should be suspect, always.
 
Like I said... I could post examples of their lies all night. You and others like you will simply whine, complain, spin, twist, and otherwise try to wriggle out of what the links show is obvious...

Media Matters Lies. Always have... ALWAYS will. And the people who look to them as the Gods of media truthfulness are no better than they.
It's quite obvious that you don't what the **** your talking about, you're just pulling this **** straight out of your ass. In order to say they lie, you must prove it, but apparently that's not in you vocabulary.
 
The same argument could be used for MM though. The issue is not that MM lies(they do), but that lots of websites lie, but you singled out one, while using others as evidence. People should question everything they read on the internet, and partisan sites should be suspect, always.

Please prove it.
 
It's quite obvious that you don't what the **** your talking about, you're just pulling this **** straight out of your ass. In order to say they lie, you must prove it, but apparently that's not in you vocabulary.

stop trolling and add something to the discussion. if you think the pieces I posted are themselves incorrect, try PROVING it instead of whining like a little girl.
 
I wouldn't say anyone who uses them for a source are just as bad as they are. They are just naive and will jump on any I hate Rush Limbaugh, Neil Bortze, Michale Savage or Glenn Beck band wagon.Media Matters caters to people who hate but do not listen to conservative talks shows. Once in a blue moon someone will be stupid enough to post a media matters article and people who actually listen to that particular talk show will point out how media matters is wrong.
 
stop trolling and add something to the discussion. if you think the pieces I posted are themselves incorrect, try PROVING it instead of whining like a little girl.
You are the one that is claiming they are liars, so they are innocent until YOU prove them guilty. And I think your condescension and baiting are against DP TOS.
 
You are the one that is claiming they are liars, so they are innocent until YOU prove them guilty. And I think your condescension and baiting are against DP TOS.

The articles he linked to explain the problems in the Media Matters bits. If you think they're wrong, then point out exactly how. If MM are the stalwart journalists full of integrity and the Light of Truth that you constantly say they are, it should be easy.

And no, it makes no difference who's saying it, you need to address the points, not the source. That should go without saying, but for anyone with a link to MM in their sig, it probably doesn't.
 
You are the one that is claiming they are liars, so they are innocent until YOU prove them guilty. And I think your condescension and baiting are against DP TOS.

I posted multiple articles showing instances where MMA lied. Not my problem if you're too blind to accept the facts as multiple sites presented them. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion... but not thier own facts. You want your own facts.

Condescension is not against the rules PB. If it was, you'd have been banned your second day on the board. As for baiting, I respectfully disagree with your opinion on my posts.
 
Last edited:
You are the one that is claiming they are liars, so they are innocent until YOU prove them guilty. And I think your condescension and baiting are against DP TOS.

Your own lib pal admits MM are liars yet you cling to them as if they are the gospel. If you want to be taken seriously, pull your head out of the sand. The MediumMatters is the Message. HA HA CHARADE YOU ARE...
 
I posted multiple articles showing instances where MMA lied. Not my problem if you're too blind to accept the facts as multiple sites presented them. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion... but not thier own facts. You want your own facts.

Condescension is not against the rules PB. If it was, you'd have been banned your second day on the board. As for baiting, I respectfully disagree with your opinion on my posts.

Here is the MM link to your second on the list, where is the lie?
Coulter says if three U.S. cities were attacked, her response would be, "Which three U.S. cities?"* | Media Matters for America
 
It seems to me, Whovian needs to do a little more than Google Media Matters lies and post the resulting links here. :roll:
Some would say the same thing about people who simply go to Media Matters.com and post the resulting links here.

Ziiiiing!!
:cool:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom