• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Glenn Beck Boycott Gaining Traction - FOX News Losing Money

Yet blue ribbon advertisers are leaving.



Won't last at least not for Beck if he keeps on losing advertisers.

If it happens I am sure you will let me know. Until then latest ratings, May 2010 have Beck with four times the viewers his latest competitors have and the quarterly results for Fox News has set a record for PROFITS.

Keep hoping that Beck fails instead of focusing on the real failure, Barack Obama.
 
If it happens I am sure you will let me know. Until then latest ratings, May 2010 have Beck with four times the viewers his latest competitors have and the quarterly results for Fox News has set a record for PROFITS.

Keep hoping that Beck fails instead of focusing on the real failure, Barack Obama.

Errr:

The Los Angeles Times' Joe Flint reports that News Corp.-owned Fox News cable news ratings are still high above the competition. But Glenn Beck's total number of viewers are down by almost 30%, from 2.9 million in January to 2.1 million in April.

Read more: Glenn Beck's Ratings Collapse


WOW he lost more than Olberman:
MSNBC's Keith Olbermann – down 28%

And was the leader of the pack in losses for Fox:

Fox News' Bill O’Reilly– down 3%

MSNCB's Rachel Maddow – down 8%

Fox News' Greta Van Sustren – down 13%

Fox News' Sean Hannity
– down 17%

Read more: Glenn Beck's Ratings Collapse

:rofl
 
The FUNNIEST thing of all is Glenn does NOT CARE!! FOX might.. I'm not sure, as they sure don't seem to mind!

I guess what is right is sometimes more important than what is profitable. I ran my business on honesty as a partner of my clients and never applied honesty in regard to the bottom line. That is something that many will never understand, but Glenn gets 100%!

He has said that they WILL get him off the air.. but that will not stop the truth or him.. we all know where to find him and I guarantee you there will ALWAYS be a great audience for Mr. Beck... as people have a need to be told the truth, just as others are so afraid of it...

So IF GB gets the boot from FOX, what do you think that will do to the ratings? Remember that is HIS show not the property of FOX and he already has the machine in place to take it out there himself, when answering.
 
Last edited:
"Fox News' Bill O’Reilly– down 3%

MSNCB's Rachel Maddow – down 8%

Fox News' Greta Van Sustren – down 13%

Fox News' Sean Hannity
– down 17%"...


You do understand the whole "it's spring time you idiot" thing don't you?
 
"Fox News' Bill O’Reilly– down 3%

MSNCB's Rachel Maddow – down 8%

Fox News' Greta Van Sustren – down 13%

Fox News' Sean Hannity
– down 17%"...


You do understand the whole "it's spring time you idiot" thing don't you?

So its spring time whoop te doo Beck is still the leader in losses at Fox News.
 
Errr:




WOW he lost more than Olberman:


And was the leader of the pack in losses for Fox:



:rofl


So let me see if I have this correct, Beck has four times the viewers than his closest competitor and that is a collapes in your world? No wonder this country is in such a mess with logic like that. keep buying what you are being told while ignoring actual results. You are a perfect example of what is wrong with this country today.
 
So let me see if I have this correct, Beck has four times the viewers than his closest competitor and that is a collapes in your world? No wonder this country is in such a mess with logic like that. keep buying what you are being told while ignoring actual results. You are a perfect example of what is wrong with this country today.

The actual results are that Beck lost far far more viewers than Olberman did.
 
The actual results are that Beck lost far far more viewers than Olberman did.

LOL, yep, Beck is on at 5 P.M. daily and Olberman is on during prime time. Brilliant analysis as usual. Olberman doesn't have a lot of viewers to lose, does he?
 
LOL, yep, Beck is on at 5 P.M. daily and Olberman is on during prime time. Brilliant analysis as usual. Olberman doesn't have a lot of viewers to lose, does he?

Ahh the master of the excuse. Ahhhem Chris Mathews (5pm time slot) did even better than when compared to Beck's 30% loss.

MSNBC's Chris Matthews – down 23%
Glenn Beck's Ratings Collapse
 
Ahh the master of the excuse. Ahhhem Chris Mathews (5pm time slot) did even better than when compared to Beck's 30% loss.

MSNBC's Chris Matthews – down 23%
Glenn Beck's Ratings Collapse

Good Lord, Winston, why do you keep up this distortion. How many viewers does Chris Matthews have vs. Beck? That is a true comparison yet you want to point out the percentage change and cannot even get that right.

For some reason, probably attention, you want to carry on this charade which does nothing but divert from reality. Beck has 4 times the viewers of Matthews and Fox News made record profits the past quarter. Now I understand how disappointed that makes you and how frustrating that is for you but there comes a time when even you have to admit that liberalism has made a fool out of you. Beck is down from a much higher base but still attracts 4 times the viewers of Matthews. how can that be, Mr. liberal?
 
Ahh the master of the excuse. Ahhhem Chris Mathews (5pm time slot) did even better than when compared to Beck's 30% loss.

MSNBC's Chris Matthews – down 23%
Glenn Beck's Ratings Collapse

And now for the "Rest of the Story" as Paul Harvey used to say.

Glenn might not be the rising ratings juggernaut month to month, like he has always been. But he's still a powerhouse in the 5 p.m. timeslot. As Joe writes, "the decline in his audience has hardly made a dent on the lead he enjoys for his 5 p.m. festival of emotions. His rivals should hold off a little on popping the Champagne."

Michael Calderone at Yahoo! News has a similar assessment: "Even with smaller ratings numbers, he's still the second-highest-rated cable news host, behind only his Fox colleague Bill O'Reilly. And Beck's year-to-year drop since April 2009 was more modest than others — 7 percent among total viewers and 6 percent in the age 25-54 demographic (the viewership advertisers most covet)."
 
Good Lord, Winston, why do you keep up this distortion.

Do you understand anything beyond your shallow little hole? Beck lost far far more viewers than either Mathews or Olberman and when compared to Beck both Mathews and Olberman had gains.

Sheeesh it is not that hard to understand.
 
Do you understand anything beyond your shallow little hole? Beck lost far far more viewers than either Mathews or Olberman and when compared to Beck both Mathews and Olberman had gains.

Sheeesh it is not that hard to understand.

Beck had a bigger base as well as still has four times the viewers of Matthews, yet his percentage loss is a victory for liberals? :rofl By the way, have you seen May's ratings? Keep making a fool of yourself because apparently you have little pride in yourself.

Now for the rest of the story

Glenn might not be the rising ratings juggernaut month to month, like he has always been. But he's still a powerhouse in the 5 p.m. timeslot. As Joe writes, "the decline in his audience has hardly made a dent on the lead he enjoys for his 5 p.m. festival of emotions. His rivals should hold off a little on popping the Champagne."

Michael Calderone at Yahoo! News has a similar assessment: "Even with smaller ratings numbers, he's still the second-highest-rated cable news host, behind only his Fox colleague Bill O'Reilly. And Beck's year-to-year drop since April 2009 was more modest than others — 7 percent among total viewers and 6 percent in the age 25-54 demographic (the viewership advertisers most covet)."
 
Boo, how many times have you watched Glenn Beck and exactly what did you personally hear that is a lie or distortion?

Once was one too many. But I have watched him a few times. Did so just the other night and couldn't stomach the entire show. I really have no idea why anyone takes him seriously at all.
 
Once was one too many. But I have watched him a few times. Did so just the other night and couldn't stomach the entire show. I really have no idea why anyone takes him seriously at all.

That is liberal arrogance and it is that arrogance that I don't understand how people can take seriously. he is being watched because he makes more sense than any liberal and the results support what he says. You want so badly to believe what you are being told yet the ideology that you are supporting fails over and over again. That is the definition of insanity.

Boo, people just don't buy your rhetoric any more because the facts simply trump that rhetoric. Facts always get in the way of liberal rhetoric for it is always results trumping rhetoric. You and others appeal to the hearts instead of appealing to the minds. Never trust what a liberal says but always see what a liberal does. Hard to overcome an ideology and cult followings but the truth will always set you free.
 
Beck had a bigger base as well as still has four times the viewers of Matthews, yet his percentage loss is a victory for liberals?

Victory or whatever mean by that is not what I was talking about. Take your partisan blinders off.

:rofl By the way, have you seen May's ratings? Keep making a fool of yourself because apparently you have little pride in yourself.

Nope and I noticed you have not posted them.


Glenn might not be the rising ratings juggernaut month to month, like he has always been. But he's still a powerhouse in the 5 p.m. timeslot. As Joe writes, "the decline in his audience has hardly made a dent on the lead he enjoys for his 5 p.m. festival of emotions. His rivals should hold off a little on popping the Champagne."

Great he has an opinion whoop tee doo.


Michael Calderone at Yahoo! News has a similar assessment: "Even with smaller ratings numbers, he's still the second-highest-rated cable news host, behind only his Fox colleague Bill O'Reilly. And Beck's year-to-year drop since April 2009 was more modest than others — 7 percent among total viewers and 6 percent in the age 25-54 demographic (the viewership advertisers most covet)."

And it looks like that trend might be changing.
 
Victory or whatever mean by that is not what I was talking about. Take your partisan blinders off.



Nope and I noticed you have not posted them.




Great he has an opinion whoop tee doo.




And it looks like that trend might be changing.

Why does it bother you so much that people watch Glenn Beck on TV? you can turn him off or turn the channel or not watch TV at all. Too bad we cannot do that with the current occupant of the WH. Glenn Beck doesn't make policy, Glenn Beck runs nothing in this country, Glenn Beck challenged Bush just like he challenges Obama yet not a word then.

The fact that Glenn Beck is like waving a red cape in front of a raging bull, Liberals, is good enough for me. The fact that he makes people like you more irrational than usual is good enough for me.
 
YAWN you know what ass-umptions make out of you?

Where is it in the liberal playbook that teaches people how to dodge direct questions? you are the one that jumped in here piling on against Glenn Beck. You did so however while making a fool of yourself by ignoring actual results. you can run from the facts which are Glenn Beck has four times the viewers than his closest competitor and the fact is Fox News had record profits during the time when liberals were taking victory laps over Glenn Beck Boycott gaining traction. Doesn't bode well for liberals but then again it never does, they just move on to some other topic. You see, liberals never admit when wrong.
 
Where is it in the liberal playbook that teaches people how to dodge direct questions? you are the one that jumped in here piling on against Glenn Beck. .

You asked for a lie that beck had on his show. I referred to the anchor baby story. Instead of responding to that you went off on some other tangent totally unrelated. As usual you started bragging about ratings. Supported with links I showed you that Beck lost far more viewers than either Olberman or Mathews and that both actually showed gains when compared to Beck. As usual you went into hyper partisan mode. You are such a tool.
 
You asked for a lie that beck had on his show. I referred to the anchor baby story. Instead of responding to that you went off on some other tangent totally unrelated. As usual you started bragging about ratings. Supported with links I showed you that Beck lost far more viewers than either Olberman or Mathews and that both actually showed gains when compared to Beck. As usual you went into hyper partisan mode. You are such a tool.

Here are the latest ratings for May 2010. Spin these. How is that Beck Boycott working out?

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/05/24/cable-news-ratings-for-friday-may-21-2010/52292

5PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Glenn Beck – 2,096,000 viewers (553,000) (987,000)
Situation Room—530,000 viewers (159,000) (206,000)
Hardball w/ C. Matthews – 592,000 viewers (151,000) (289,000)
Fast Money(5:00 – 5:30pm) – 252,000 viewers (86,000) (158,000)
Options Action (5:30 – 6:00pm) – 204,000 viewers (77,000) (143,000)
Showbiz Tonight —188,000 viewers (57,000) (127,000)
 
Here are the latest ratings for May 2010. Spin these. How is that Beck Boycott working out?

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2010/05/24/cable-news-ratings-for-friday-may-21-2010/52292

5PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Glenn Beck – 2,096,000 viewers (553,000) (987,000)
Situation Room—530,000 viewers (159,000) (206,000)
Hardball w/ C. Matthews – 592,000 viewers (151,000) (289,000)
Fast Money(5:00 – 5:30pm) – 252,000 viewers (86,000) (158,000)
Options Action (5:30 – 6:00pm) – 204,000 viewers (77,000) (143,000)
Showbiz Tonight —188,000 viewers (57,000) (127,000)


What is to spin on a single days viewership?
 
What is to spin on a single days viewership?

Here this ought to make you "feel" great, Glenn Beck's ratings dropped 10% for the week of May 17. Doesn't matter that he maintained a 4-1 lead over competition but his viewership is down from Monday to Friday.:rofl

Cable News Ratings for Thursday, May 20, 2010
5PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Glenn Beck – 2,029,000 viewers (615,000) (1,014,000)
Situation Room—501,000 viewers (146,000) (213,000)
Hardball w/ C. Matthews – 496,000 viewers (106,000) (241,000)
Fast Money – 309,000 viewers (73,000) (165,000)
Showbiz Tonight —188,000 viewers (99,000) (113,000)

Cable News Ratings for Wednesday, May 19, 2010
5PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Glenn Beck – 2,178,000 viewers (644,000) (1,028,000)
Situation Room—514,000 viewers (164,000) (205,000)
Hardball w/ C. Matthews – 527,000 viewers (109,000) (228,000)
Fast Money – 252,000 viewers (71,000) (162,000)
Showbiz Tonight —191,000 viewers (83,000) (104,000)

Cable News Ratings for Tuesday, May 18; Fox News Dominates Primary Election Night
5PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Glenn Beck – 2,190,000 viewers (598,000) (948,000)
Situation Room—564,000 viewers (161,000) (223,000)
Hardball w/ C. Matthews – 564,000 viewers (129,000) (249,000)
Fast Money – 212,000 viewers (70,000) (137,000)
Showbiz Tonight —253,000 viewers (124,000) (131,000)
Cable News Ratings for Monday, May 17, 2010
5PM – P2+ (25-54) (35-64)
Glenn Beck – 2,208,000 viewers (632,000) (1,027,000)
Situation Room—506,000 viewers (120,000) (214,000)
Hardball w/ C. Matthews – 475,000 viewers (87,000) (168,000)
Fast Money – 323,000 viewers (91,000) (160,000)
Showbiz Tonight —176,000 viewers (77,000) (69,000)
 
Back
Top Bottom