• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is up with Rush???

No. Now you are sounding like the rest of his hypocritical supporters.

Rush, after consulting with his lawyer, surrendered on an arrest warrant that had been issued for him. A lot of people do that. If he hadn't, a Sheriff would have been sent out to arrest him. His surrender is self-serving and saves him the embarassment of being arrested in public.

Why do you think that it makes a difference?

Do you want to go down this road we can if you like mind you I can find all sort of folks from the Left who have done the same thing.
 
Do you want to go down this road we can if you like mind you I can find all sort of folks from the Left who have done the same thing.

I'm not afraid to go down any road you wanna go.

Again...its not that Rush Limbaugh is a drug addict that is relevant. What is relevant is the hypocrisy that he is somehow different than those he railed against.
 
I listen to Rush Limbaugh.

I think this will be the last: "why do you listen to Rush? He's such a fat lying lairest, liest, liary-liar who likes to lie and use drugs all the time" thread I'm going to participate in.
 
No. Now you are sounding like the rest of his hypocritical supporters.

Rush, after consulting with his lawyer, surrendered on an arrest warrant that had been issued for him. A lot of people do that. If he hadn't, a Sheriff would have been sent out to arrest him. His surrender is self-serving and saves him the embarassment of being arrested in public.

Why do you think that it makes a difference?

So it doesn't matter to you that Rush was never convicted of anything?

Sure, his surrender was part of a deal, that's the mark of a good lawyer, but Rush completed his 18 month rehab and the charges were dropped.

I mean, 'the left' is defending Tiller to the hilt because Tiller was never found guilty, but that standard doesn't apply to Rush?

And you call me a hypocrite?
 
Last edited:
I listen to Rush Limbaugh.

I think this will be the last: "why do you listen to Rush? He's such a fat lying lairest, liest, liary-liar who likes to lie and use drugs all the time" thread I'm going to participate in.

You seriously have to question the intelligence of those who get their information from a drug addict though.
 
I listen to Rush Limbaugh.

I think this will be the last: "why do you listen to Rush? He's such a fat lying lairest, liest, liary-liar who likes to lie and use drugs all the time" thread I'm going to participate in.

All we said was he lies, and I believe the right brought up drug use...
 
So it doesn't matter to you that Rush was never convicted of anything?

Sure, his surrender was part of a deal, that's the mark of a good lawyer, but Rush completed his 18 month rehab and the charges were dropped.

Not at all....MOST drug cases are handled exactly the same way. Its called "Drug Diversion" or "Deferred Entry of Judgement". Its a common way that cases for druggies are handled in the courts. You don't need a "good lawyer" for it. Any decent lawyer can get their client the same exact deal if they otherwise have a clean record.

I find it hilarious that his supporters have been spoonfed the mistaken belief that Rush got this deal because he is somehow different than every other first time drug addict.
 
Last edited:
No...for two reasons:

(1) Obama is not a drug addict

how do you know that, he's admitted to using them before?

(2) Obama is not the hypocrite that Limbaugh is.

How many terabytes are we allowed?

Again, it is more about the hypocrisy than the drug addiction.

No, it was most certainly drug-addiction until that avenue met a road-block.
 
You seriously have to question the intelligence of those who get their information from a drug addict though.

You mean like getting information from JFK to start with shall I go on ??????
 
how do you know that, he's admitted to using them before?



How many terabytes are we allowed?



No, it was most certainly drug-addiction until that avenue met a road-block.

I haven't seen any evidence, credible or otherwise that Obama has ever been addicted to anything.

Secondly, you are simply wrong. It ALWAYS has been about the hypocrisy, never about the drug use.
It is one thing to become addicted to drugs...it is another to say one thing, do another and when busted try to argue that you are somehow different.
 
You mean like getting information from JFK to start with shall I go on ??????

You are free to do whatever you choose. I love your veiled "threats".

The reality is....as I have stated before. The drug use is not what is relevant. It is the hypocrisy of Rush, and his supporters that seek to justify his drug addiction and hypocrisy.
 
Not at all....MOST drug cases are handled exactly the same way. Its called "Drug Diversion" or "Deferred Entry of Judgement". Its a common way that cases for druggies are handled in the courts. You don't need a "good lawyer" for it. Any decent lawyer can get their client the same exact deal if they otherwise have a clean record.

I find it hilarious that his supporters have been spoonfed the mistaken belief that Rush got this deal because he is somehow different than every other first time drug addict.

It would help if you had a complete manuscript containing an example of one such rant.
 
It would help if you had a complete manuscript containing an example of one such rant.

I have no idea what you are saying here.

Are you trying to argue that Rush didn't receive the same Drug Diversion that every drug addict without a record gets?

Here is California's Law:

In the state of California, Penal Code 1000 allows criminal offenders who have committed drug and alcohol related crimes to have a second chance. According to PC 1000, people who have been charged with certain types of drug and/or alcohol offenses will be allowed to avoid jail time if they meet certain terms. In order to be eligible for PC 1000, the offender must:

not have a conviction for any prior drug related offenses
not have committed a crime that involved violence
not have revoked probation or parole on his/her criminal record
not have a prior felony conviction within the past 5 years
In order for people to fulfill the terms of Penal Code 1000, they must enter a “guilty” plea and in return the court will not enter a judgment of conviction. The person must then complete a 12 week drug and alcohol course, refrain from being arrested for 18 months, and then pay a fee to the court. After these terms have been met, the court will enter a judgment of dismissal, which will allow the person to move forward with their life.

Proposition 36

Proposition 36, officially known as the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act, was passed in California in the year 2000. Proposition 36 is a law that allows both 1st and 2nd time drug and alcohol crime offenders to attend state regulated treatment programs instead of being placed in jail. In order to qualify for Prop 36, people must have only committed simple, non-violent drug crimes. Many people voted for this law in belief that it is better to treat addictive behavior through education and professional counseling than to punish addicts by simply placing them in jail.
 
Last edited:
You are free to do whatever you choose. I love your veiled "threats".

The reality is....as I have stated before. The drug use is not what is relevant. It is the hypocrisy of Rush, and his supporters that seek to justify his drug addiction and hypocrisy.

The same could be said for the Left and their blind faith in what JFK did also
 
You are free to do whatever you choose. I love your veiled "threats".

The reality is....as I have stated before. The drug use is not what is relevant. It is the hypocrisy of Rush, and his supporters that seek to justify his drug addiction and hypocrisy.

What I find funny, is despite the fact that nearly 10 times you have said "hypocrisy" the right has said "drug use," it's like one of those chain reaction things. You guys really need to read what he writes, before you speak, or you could take a leaf out of W's book, and just react, react, react...only difference is you guys only embarass yourselves here, not all of America. Though, you are a scathing indictment of America's educational system.
 
I have no idea what you are saying here.

Are you trying to argue that Rush didn't receive the same Drug Diversion that every drug addict without a record gets?

I'm asking you to provide your basis of comparison.

We can all Google the epic of Rush to see one side, but what did Rush say that makes him the hypocrite you accuse him of being?
 
I'm asking you to pride your basis of comparison.

We can all Google the epic of Rush to see one side, but what did Rush say that makes him the hypocrite you accuse him of being?

I posted California's law....I'll have to do a search for Rush's comments. But he has notoriously said that drug addicts should be thrown in jail.
Give me a few seconds.
 
I posted California's law....I'll have to do a search for Rush's comments. But he has notoriously said that drug addicts should be thrown in jail.
Give me a few seconds.

Right, I don't care about California's law, I'm not contesting any part of that.

Being a hypocrite is not illegal.

Rush's actual words -vs- his actions. We can find his actions, but where are his words?
 
Right, I don't care about California's law, I'm not contesting any part of that.

Being a hypocrite is not illegal.

Rush's actual words -vs- his actions. We can find his actions, but where are his words?

Limbaugh on Drugs

And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.

I'm trying to find something on youtube as well.
 
Being a hypocrite is not illegal.

Not to say it isn't something to definetely be avoided. Being a hypocrite isn't good. About the same as being a spineless flip-flopper.
 
Limbaugh on Drugs

And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up.

I'm trying to find something on youtube as well.

This website contained only tiny snips

I'm looking for his words in context.
 
This website contained only tiny snips

I'm looking for his words in context.


I don't know that you can argue that any of those snipets are taken out of context. I've actually read the entire transcripts of some of those.
If I get the time, I'll try to track some of them down for you. Or better yet...I'll try to find them on youtube and you can hear them straight out of the horses mouth.
 
Back
Top Bottom