• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Judge Napolitano's Awesome Rant

Thoreau72 said:
Thank you Nap, and welcome to DP. If you don't already know, it is extremely difficult, likely impossible, to have a rational discussion with a person in denial of facts and ignorant of current events.

Some are so deeply in denial they reject the information offered by sitting judges. Not that judges are perfect or angelic, but still.....
Click to expand...

You're welcome, and Thanks for the welcome.

It isn't a rare occurrence. There was an actual study on people that actually were more steadfast in their beliefs when presented with facts contrary to their position.
 
Last edited:
Geoist said:
Want to make a correction: I assumed this was a recent rant but it is actually from 2012. It is still quite relevant now more than ever. The video poster claims the rant got him fired.
Click to expand...

The date was Nov. 23 , 2011.
 
haymarket said:
So in carrying out a military strike in an area of the world infamous for war, people were killed in that military strike.

And because Obama is Commander in Chief, that translates to WHAT IF THE PRESIDENT COULD KILL YOU WITHOUT WARNING?

Talk about not living up to the hype of the claim!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

You are missing the point entirely. This was a directed attack on a US citizen without due process. So when he asks rhetorically what if a President can kill you without warning the precedent has been set. Take out the fact that it was under Obama, is this a power we really want to entrust with anyone?
 
Nap said:
You are missing the point entirely. This was a directed attack on a US citizen without due process. So when he asks rhetorically what if a President can kill you without warning the precedent has been set. Take out the fact that it was under Obama, is this a power we really want to entrust with anyone?
Click to expand...

I think I will save my fake outrage for something else.
 
haymarket said:
I think I will save my fake outrage for something else.
Click to expand...

Will you save it for a judge or citizen or whistleblower exposing the crimes of government? Will you then defend those crimes as being necessary and expedient?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom