• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Company refuses to do business with trump supporters

It's not different except that this one stokes your persecution complex.
Same comment as made towards Deuce...can you point to a SINGLE comment on this thread where someone is claiming it is unfair or that he shouldnt have the right to do what he is doing?
 
Thats a good yahoo son. Now...can you point to where people are saying its not fair and not his right? I believe most people are just pointing out the hypocrisy of leftists that bleat about tolerance and their complete lack of connection with the word. Wouldnt you say that is far more correct?

Edit: reviewed 24 posts on this thread...not a single person whining or complaining about whether or not the practice is unfair. Not a one.

Stop your own party line bleating about tolerance. It's completely idiotic.
 
I support his Right to not do business with those he doesn't wish to. But I think he's an idiot for doing this.
 
Stop your own party line bleating about tolerance. It's completely idiotic.
You arent doing a very good job of making a point. ANY point. You and Deuce both have a silly argument that isnt based on fact. You are kinda embarrassing yourselves.
 
Thats a good yahoo son. Now...can you point to where people are saying its not fair and not his right? I believe most people are just pointing out the hypocrisy of leftists that bleat about tolerance and their complete lack of connection with the word. Wouldnt you say that is far more correct?

Edit: reviewed 24 posts on this thread...not a single person whining or complaining about whether or not the practice is unfair. Not a one.

I can read between the lines.
 
You arent doing a very good job of making a point. ANY point. You and Deuce both have a silly argument that isnt based on fact. You are kinda embarrassing yourselves.

My point is that all you Cons are now bleating like the sheep you are about "tolerance" when it goes against you.
 
I can read between the lines.
:lamo

No...you can fabricate silly arguments that are not there, but thats about it. 31 posts and counting..and not a single person ahs done what you really really really WISH they would do so your argument might have some form of validity.

For once. :lamo
 
My point is that all you Cons are now bleating like the sheep you are about "tolerance" when it goes against you.
No...your initial point was to try to make a ridiculous argument comparing this to other cases. THAT failed miserably. Then you went on to try to make the point that people are complaining that it is unfair. THAT ALSO failed miserably. NOW you are trying to salvage this by making an argument re 'tolerance'. OK...lets talk about tolerance. I personally believe that I can love people...even people I disagree with...and be tolerant of them. That doesnt require them to change or me to change and doesnt impact our relationship. Now...what do YOU believe tolerance means?
 
I guess Cons and Republican only preach 'rights' and the free market businesses when it involves gays and minorities. As soon as it involves people from the other side of the aisle exercising their rights then they get all pissed off.
 
I guess Cons and Republican only preach 'rights' and the free market when it involves gays and minorities. As soon as it involves people from the other side of the aisle exercising their rights then they get all pissed off.
:lamo

And a third one leaps from the high dive into a pool with no water....

CAN you show where ANYONE in this thread is denying his RIGHT to be an intolerant douchebag? And lets talk about his position...do you AGREE with him? notice...Im not asking if you think its his right...just...do you AGREE with him?
 
So why do they have that freedom, but not these businesses?

As I recall, it was their "Constitutional right." Doesn't the Constitution apply to liberals too. Or us this different (like everything always is)

This fellow has the right not to do business with Trump voters if he wishes. I'm sure his competition will be glad to hear about his decision.

I doubt that this is publicly owned company, though. Otherwise the stock holders would sue him for breech of fiduciary duty.

Another business owner, one that sells spices in Wisconsin, made the same decision to exclude Trump voters. The man's brother, who owns a competing spice company stepped up and said that everyone is welcomed to buy from him, there are no politics at his spice shops. It will probably make for an interesting Thanksgiving get together for that family.

What do we call this? A reverse boycott? Where instead of customers refusing to do business with a company the company refuses to do business with a group of customers? Some liberals are truly going out of their minds.

This fellow claims Trump is a "fascist". I doubt he knows what the word means. Trump is a bore and a braggart who sometimes lies and exaggerates. He has shown no signs of being a fascist.
 
Not on Obama's watch.

Another example of how politicized the DOJ has become under Obama.

From my understanding, the DOJ, FBI, and IRS are the government agencies need to stay out of the political fray, to avoid even the slightest of appearances of being politicized, yet, under Obama, we've seen all three become weaponized against the electorate (probably the least in the case of the FBI), specifically the part of the electorate that doesn't agree with Obama and his agenda.

If there's a legacy that Obama is going to get, should get, deserves to get, this would be it.
 
Another example of how politicized the DOJ has become under Obama.

From my understanding, the DOJ, FBI, and IRS are the government agencies need to stay out of the political fray, to avoid even the slightest of appearances of being politicized, yet, under Obama, we've seen all three become weaponized against the electorate (probably the least in the case of the FBI), specifically the part of the electorate that doesn't agree with Obama and his agenda.

If there's a legacy that Obama is going to get, should get, deserves to get, this would be it.

That hits the nail smack on the head.
 
That hits the nail smack on the head.

Yup. Politicized and weaponized.

Justice’s Liberal Slush Fund
Legal settlements are being used to funnel millions to left-wing activists like La Raza.
By Kimberley A. Strassel Dec. 3, 2015
Justice?s Liberal Slush Fund - WSJ
Republicans talk often about using the “power of the purse” to rein in a lawless Obama administration. If they mean it, they ought to use their year-end spending bill to stop a textbook case of outrageous executive overreach.

This scandal comes courtesy of the Justice Department, which for 16 months has engaged in a scheme to undermine Congress’s spending authority by independently transferring dollars to President Obama’s political allies. The department is in the process of funneling more than half-a-billion dollars to liberal activist groups, at least some of which will actively support Democrats in the coming election.

It works likes this: The Justice Department prosecutes cases against supposed corporate bad actors. Those companies agree to settlements that include financial penalties. Then Justice mandates that at least some of that penalty money be paid in the form of “donations” to nonprofits that supposedly aid consumers and bolster neighborhoods.

The Justice Department maintains a list of government-approved nonprofit beneficiaries. And surprise, surprise: Many of them are liberal activist groups. The National Council of La Raza. The National Urban League. The National Community Reinvestment Coalition. NeighborWorks America (which awards grants to left-leaning community organization groups, and has been compared with Acorn).

Hmm. Maybe Obama's legacy will also include his corruption?
 
Okay, here's something that may bring us all together.
It was on Tucker Carlson's show last night and it was the most pompous full-of-himself self-congratulating human possibly ever ... and I don't mean Tucker.
You've got to watch this ... he was the first guest.

TRUMP TRANSITION: NEW APPOINTMENTS - Tucker Carlson ... - Bing video

Am I right? Are we all on board with this?
Happy Thanksgiving.

Actually he targets ALL Republicans. That SEO is actually including #NeverTrump-ers in exclusion.
 
Okay, here's something that may bring us all together.
It was on Tucker Carlson's show last night and it was the most pompous full-of-himself self-congratulating human possibly ever ... and I don't mean Tucker.
You've got to watch this ... he was the first guest.

TRUMP TRANSITION: NEW APPOINTMENTS - Tucker Carlson ... - Bing video

Am I right? Are we all on board with this?
Happy Thanksgiving.

Do I think it is a smart move? Hell no

Do I think he has a right to do it? Of course

Just as I have supported a business person's right to do business with whomever they want to, or not want to with a few exclusions

I think it is silly in today's business climate....tough enough to make a buck as it is

But owners can make whatever dumbass decisions they want....it is their money they invested, and their money to lose

Kinda stupid IMO, but freedom means you have the utter right to be an idiot
 
I support his Right to not do business with those he doesn't wish to. But I think he's an idiot for doing this.

I'm not so sure about that. What about the notion of any publicity is good publicity? That CEO and Donald Trump are two peas in a pod. Ironic, isn't it?
 
If we truly value freedom then businesses should be free to choose their customers just as customers can choose their businesses. Closing your business to a large group of people is bad business and stupid but freedom is what it is. We should be allowed to be stupid.
 
Again...show a single example where they havent sold products to gays.

I believe what you are going to try to refer to is the decision to not cater a gay wedding...NOT refusing to sell pizzas to gays. There is a difference.

Is this different from refusing to tow a car with a Bernie Sanders bumper sticker?
 
Okay, here's something that may bring us all together.
It was on Tucker Carlson's show last night and it was the most pompous full-of-himself self-congratulating human possibly ever ... and I don't mean Tucker.
You've got to watch this ... he was the first guest.

TRUMP TRANSITION: NEW APPOINTMENTS - Tucker Carlson ... - Bing video

Am I right? Are we all on board with this?
Happy Thanksgiving.

It's his business to do whatever he wants with. If he wants to flush it then so be it. Yay him. He self identified himself as a really really bad decision maker. He comes across as a self righteous prick regardless of his political beliefs. I noticed he uses his "airy deep" voice. That is an affect used by radio advertisers in commercials to make their voice sound more dramatic. I was not impressed. He is going to fail.
 
It's his business to do whatever he wants with. If he wants to flush it then so be it. Yay him. He self identified himself as a really really bad decision maker. He comes across as a self righteous prick regardless of his political beliefs. I noticed he uses his "airy deep" voice. That is an affect used by radio advertisers in commercials to make their voice sound more dramatic. I was not impressed. He is going to fail.

If Warner Brothers needs a voice for Wile E. Coyote for a new version of Road Runner, they are covered.
 
I support his Right to not do business with those he doesn't wish to. But I think he's an idiot for doing this.
I fully support his right to not do business with deplorables. And I am more than happy to accommodate him in this regard. Unless, you know, he's like, the only supplier of hickory smoked bacon in the world.
 
Is this different from refusing to tow a car with a Bernie Sanders bumper sticker?
Nope...THATS pretty much the same thing. Though I dont believe the guy you are citing stated his reasoning had ANYTHING to do with her being a Sanders supporter but rather that his experience was that Socialists are low life pieces of **** that refused to pay their bills. Right?
 
Back
Top Bottom