• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Literally shaking

Wait, you actually think Ann Coulter is going to run for President in 2020, and win?

This is something you actually consider to be a valid concept?

imo she is going to make a great first female president.
 
Hey now, I said they would not nominate and especially not actually elect a Narcissist Billionaire to the Oval Office. So I would say the bar is now set Very Low and any crazy idea is now possible. Welcome to the New America, let me know when the New wears off.

You should take into account this narcissist is replacing one.
 
As well as being a best-selling author, Ann Coulter helped found the Cornell Review, earned her law degree at Michigan and served as an editor of the Michigan Law Review, clerked for a U.S. appellate court, and worked for the Senate Judiciary Committee, where she helped draft deportation legislation. I'm sure she does understand first-hand more than Donald Trump does. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ann_Coulter

Then she should know something about law.
 
I can't stand her.

But I think she got it right differentiating between the liberalism of Bernie Sanders, vs some of the Millennials.

So I give her credit, there.

She's an acquired taste but it helps to have already made the same observations while never expressing them yourself in quite the same way.
 
its a proven fact that shes much smarter at politics than people like Rachel maddow, Hillary Clinton, Obama..etc. its no surprise that she will win the white house in 2020 and be our first woman president :)
All that's a "proven fact" now - is that you could not *prove* your assertion! :doh

This has to be one of the weakest displays of sources (and subsequent deflection) I've ever seen.

Could it be the sources you claim, are non-existent?
 
I've never really listened to or read her. Was mildly interesting, not something I'd pursue. But yes the drama queen and the hypocrisy of it, I think most of us non-die-hard liberals see it for what it is.

This bit was interesting:
Last year, old lefty Bernie Sanders said mass immigration was a disaster for the working class, driving down their wages. He called open borders "a Koch brothers idea.”
Yeah Mach, I picked-up on that right away, and she strikes me as right here.

I happen to agree.
 
Yeah Mach, I picked-up on that right away, and she strikes me as right here.

I happen to agree.

I believe that Trump's lack of support from e.g. the Koch Brothers & the Chamber of Commerce while linking open borders to working class problems went a loooong way to capturing those blue firewall states.
The Chamber is as big a booster of relaxed immigration policy as the Democrat Party.
They haven't been a reliable Republican home for years.
 
I believe that Trump's lack of support from e.g. the Koch Brothers & the Chamber of Commerce while linking open borders to working class problems went a loooong way to capturing those blue firewall states.
The Chamber is as big a booster of relaxed immigration policy as the Democrat Party.
They haven't been a reliable Republican home for years.
Yep.

As is sometimes also said of the NRA: "It's not your father's Chamber of Commerce"!

BTW - The Dem's policies concerning immigration are one of the key elements that caused me to walk away from them! A long time ago!
 
The drunker I get, the better she looks to me. I'll bet we could have a first date at the firing range.
 
Hot, blonde and bitchy.
 
Ann Coulter is an extremist. She's crazy town and just beyond awful.
 
All that's a "proven fact" now - is that you could not *prove* your assertion! :doh

This has to be one of the weakest displays of sources (and subsequent deflection) I've ever seen.

Could it be the sources you claim, are non-existent?

If you think this is weak you should read his silliness in the Birther thread in the CT section.

As to coulter while I agree with her positions from time to time there is just something about her that really rubs me the wrong way.
 
If you think this is weak you should read his silliness in the Birther thread in the CT section.

As to coulter while I agree with her positions from time to time there is just something about her that really rubs me the wrong way.
With all respect to the denizens of CT, I can't imagine myself spending time down there arguing nonsense.
 
With all respect to the denizens of CT, I can't imagine myself spending time down there arguing nonsense.

It's good for a laugh every once in a while. Also it gives you a better idea of the thinking ability of several of our posters.
 
Back
Top Bottom