• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Onion gets it.

Harshaw

Filmmaker ● Lawyer ● Patriot
DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
38,750
Reaction score
13,845
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
DNC Aiming To Reconnect With Working-Class Americans With New ‘Hamilton’-Inspired Lena Dunham Web Series - The Onion - America's Finest News Source

:2razz:

WASHINGTON—Saying the new effort would help them make critical inroads with low-income rural voters following a stunning election loss last week, the Democratic National Committee announced the launch of a new Hamilton-inspired web series Tuesday starring Lena Dunham intended to connect with working-class Americans and address their most pressing concerns. “We’re hoping to make up the ground we lost with white working-class voters and union members who once made up our base with a new 10-part hip-hop musical set in rural Wisconsin, featuring a down-on-her-luck manufacturing worker played by Lena Dunham,” said DNC interim chair Donna Brazile, who added that, in an effort to appeal to economically distressed voters, each episode would see the protagonists tackle a different theme, such as taxes or free trade, through the choreography of five-time Tony winner Susan Stroman. “We are confident that with the help of Josh Gad, Debra Messing, Jesse Tyler Ferguson, and the creative team behind The Mindy Project, we can bring Americans who feel like they have been left behind by globalization back to the Democratic Party. Viewers will also have the chance to win a trip to be in the audience at a live TED Talk taping if they share the series on Instagram, which we believe will draw considerable interest across the nation’s heartland.” Brazile added that the web series would be available exclusively through Seeso and HBO Go.

I haven't seen many signs that the rest of the media does, though.
 
The Onion "gets it"... that is the premise of the thread?
 
The Onion "gets it"... that is the premise of the thread?

I think Harshaw wants people to be able to read his mind because he seems to be making assumptions that everyone should know what points he is trying to make.
 

From the link: "Viewers will also have the chance to win a trip to be in the audience at a live TED Talk taping if they share the series on Instagram, which we believe will draw considerable interest across the nation’s heartland." :lamo

Yeah, they get it.
 
Well, yeah.

Do you not follow their point?

the Onion doesn't get anything. And their point is always the same- satire is just a baby step away from real news.
 
the Onion doesn't get anything. And their point is always the same- satire is just a baby step away from real news.

In order for there to be effective satire, you have to make a point.

You may not like the point they're making, but that doesn't mean there isn't one.
 
Well, yeah.

Do you not follow their point?

The question is do you follow their point, being they are a satire news site?
 
The question is do you follow their point, being they are a satire news site?

Of course I do. Which is why I surmise that they get it.

Get what, you ask? If you do follow their point, then it's self-explanatory.

What do you think their point is? And don't say "satire," because that's not an answer.
 
In order for there to be effective satire, you have to make a point.

You may not like the point they're making, but that doesn't mean there isn't one.

They're ridiculing the 'point' you seem to think they're making. They've taken that whole "try to find out how we lost the ordinary people and how we can get them back" angst and took it just that baby step further to make it ridiculous.
Or do you see something else there?
 
They're ridiculing the 'point' you seem to think they're making. They've taken that whole "try to find out how we lost the ordinary people and how we can get them back" angst and took it just that baby step further to make it ridiculous.
Or do you see something else there?

They're not ridiculing the point. They're ridiculing the cluelessness as to how the "ordinary people" were lost.

And it's funny.
 
From the link: "Viewers will also have the chance to win a trip to be in the audience at a live TED Talk taping if they share the series on Instagram, which we believe will draw considerable interest across the nation’s heartland." :lamo

Yeah, they get it.

And that's one of the key lines.

You could possibly read it as ridiculing the backwoods provincials as not having any culture, not connected to modern society, but the "we believe" in that line tells you for sure what they're getting at.
 
And that's one of the key lines.

You could possibly read it as ridiculing the backwoods provincials as not having any culture, not connected to modern society, but the "we believe" in that line tells you for sure what they're getting at.

Exactly.
 
In order for there to be effective satire, you have to make a point.

You may not like the point they're making, but that doesn't mean there isn't one.

Some folks are more receptive to humor and satire than others.....:mrgreen:
 
And that's one of the key lines.

You could possibly read it as ridiculing the backwoods provincials as not having any culture, not connected to modern society, but the "we believe" in that line tells you for sure what they're getting at.

Yes. They're ridiculing the 'we believe'. The whole soul-searching, navel-gazing angst-ridden search for whys and wherefores. That's the object of their ridicule, that search.
 
Yes. They're ridiculing the 'we believe'. The whole soul-searching, navel-gazing angst-ridden search for whys and wherefores. That's the object of their ridicule, that search.

No.

Like I said, you seem to be simply refusing to grasp the point.
 
No.

Like I said, you seem to be simply refusing to grasp the point.

And as I said, there is no point. There's only some light ridicule of what you seem to think is the point.
Democrats trying to guess why they lost the ordinary people and trying to fix that is what's being ridiculed. I fail to see how you can't see that.
 
And as I said, there is no point. There's only some light ridicule of what you seem to think is the point.

No, dude. Just because you don't like the point, it doesn't mean there isn't one.

That's one of the dumber online "debate" tactics to come along recently - no, you can't just disagree, you have to insist mightily that there's nothing even to disagree with.

Democrats trying to guess why they lost the ordinary people and trying to fix that is what's being ridiculed. I fail to see how you can't see that.

No, I can see it; up through even the first half of this post, you were the one refusing to concede there was even THAT much of a point.

But you still haven't taken it far enough. It's also lampooning their inability to figure out how to get back in touch, because they cannot examine their own assumptions critically.

None of this is hard if you're willing to let it in.
 
Back
Top Bottom