• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Newt Gingrich, Fox News' Megyn Kelly Clash Over Trump Accusers

calamity said:
The play out of this Civil War within the GOP will be epic.
Click to expand...

I think you are going to be very disappointed as nearly all of the GOP establishment that was expected to win their races will and Trump will lose big and fade fast and his hardcore supporters mostly first time voters and all-righters will fade just as quickly
 
ocean515 said:
LOL

It would be interesting to see an anti-Trumpoid actually quote Trump, rather than the memes they dredge from their toilet.
Click to expand...

It's is an actual quote.

"When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” -DJT
 
Crovax said:
I think you are going to be very disappointed as nearly all of the GOP establishment that was expected to win their races will and Trump will lose big and fade fast and his hardcore supporters mostly first time voters and all-righters will fade just as quickly
Click to expand...

Very likely.

Trumpism was never any real "anti-establishment" movement. Only one incumbent, nationwide, lost her primary.

No one's going to switch parties; there will be no "comeuppance" against the "establishment," and the Trumpkins will crawl back under their rocks and sulk. They were wrong, horribly, disastrously wrong, and while they may try to blame others for it, no one will bite.
 
Crovax said:
"They’re rapists" -DJT

I love "debating" with Trumpettes, just directly quoting Donald Trump is enough to refute their arguments
Click to expand...

Excpt the problem is, they are in such a deep state of denial, NOTHING can refute their desired beliefs regarding their demagogue!
 
Crovax said:
Besides the fact that it would cost twice as much as Trump's wall with an enormous upkeep cost on top of that, provide little benefit and be completely impossible to achieve in the time frame he set? Nothing at all
Click to expand...

I'd rather be spending that money on a colony that would provide great benefit than the constant wars we've been in longer than I've been alive. ...And yes, there are lots of minerals and possible scientific advances available to be found on the moon that would benefit the entire world immensely, whether you wish to acknowledge that or not.
 
Kal'Stang said:
I'd rather be spending that money on a colony that would provide great benefit than the constant wars we've been in longer than I've been alive. ...And yes, there are lots of minerals and possible scientific advances available to be found on the moon that would benefit the entire world immensely, whether you wish to acknowledge that or not.
Click to expand...

As soon as you acknowledge how impossible building a moon colony with our current technology in under 8 years is
 
Kelly has been taking a beating by Trump supporters since that very 1st debate when she dared bring up Trump's issues with women....I applauded her at the time and still do. Why is she made out to be the bad person for pointing out the primary issue that many many women have with him....sure..I know there are some women who support him....but that number is/was small....and will continue to be small because most of us woman are not so tolerant towards men like Trump...and no matter what or who runs against him there is nothing that can make these women look the other way or ignore the fact that Trump is constantly claiming nobody respects women more than he does... yet we have decades of proof that he has no respect women from past interviews both radio to TV including video clippings and twitter rants.
 
tres borrachos said:
Did anyone else catch this last night? I'm in a hotel and with limited choices watched Megyn instead of the Series. I can't believe how low Gingrich has fallen. Everyone associated with Trump has become a caricature.

Gingrich: "You are fascinated with sex, and you don't care about public policy."

Kelly: "Me, really?"


Gingrich: "That's what I get out of watching you tonight."

Kelly: "You know, Mr. Speaker, I'm not fascinated by sex, but I am fascinated by the protection of women and understanding what we're getting in the Oval Office ..."

Gingrich: "You want a comment on whether the Clinton ticket has a relationship to a sexual predator? ... I want to hear you use the words 'Bill Clinton, sexual predator.' I dare you. Say 'Bill Clinton, sexual predator.'"

At the end of the segment, Kelly signed off with this: "We're going to have to leave it at that, and you can take your anger issues and spend some time working on them, Mr. Speaker."

Gingrich responded: "And you, too. You, too."


Newt Gingrich, Fox News''' Megyn Kelly Clash Over Trump Accusers - NBC News
Click to expand...

I saw it when it happened.
Kelly lit the fuse when she used the term "sexual predator" in a question about Trump ... Gingrich didn't use the term first ... he just challenged her to use it about someone else and she didn't.
She could have asked her question without using that term which was definitely outrageous.
She was being deliberately inflammatory ... maybe she hasn't gotten over her earlier Trump fight.
 
Crovax said:
It's is an actual quote.

"When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” -DJT
Click to expand...

In reference to illegal immigrants. Something that many seem to not just conveniently forget but actively ignore and pretend that he meant and talked about all the people from Mexico.
 
tres borrachos said:
Did anyone else catch this last night? I'm in a hotel and with limited choices watched Megyn instead of the Series. I can't believe how low Gingrich has fallen. Everyone associated with Trump has become a caricature.

Gingrich: "You are fascinated with sex, and you don't care about public policy."

Kelly: "Me, really?"


Gingrich: "That's what I get out of watching you tonight."

Kelly: "You know, Mr. Speaker, I'm not fascinated by sex, but I am fascinated by the protection of women and understanding what we're getting in the Oval Office ..."

Gingrich: "You want a comment on whether the Clinton ticket has a relationship to a sexual predator? ... I want to hear you use the words 'Bill Clinton, sexual predator.' I dare you. Say 'Bill Clinton, sexual predator.'"

At the end of the segment, Kelly signed off with this: "We're going to have to leave it at that, and you can take your anger issues and spend some time working on them, Mr. Speaker."

Gingrich responded: "And you, too. You, too."


Newt Gingrich, Fox News''' Megyn Kelly Clash Over Trump Accusers - NBC News
Click to expand...

Moon Base Newtie just needs to stay at Nieman Marcus shopping with his bimbo number whatever wife.
 
bubbabgone said:
I saw it when it happened.
Kelly lit the fuse when she used the term "sexual predator" in a question about Trump ... Gingrich didn't use the term first ... he just challenged her to use it about someone else and she didn't.
She could have asked her question without using that term which was definitely outrageous.
She was being deliberately inflammatory ... maybe she hasn't gotten over her earlier Trump fight.
Click to expand...

I didn't see it. I don't care for Kelly, personally. I think she's deliberately snarky - always in search of hitting the ratings rather than actually pursuing her points legitimately. And she did the GQ thing, which in my view doesn't do anything for the women's causes she occasionally espouses. Newt's a pretty sharp guy, but he's always appeared to be pretty impressed with himself, and that's another non-starter for me. Naturally, she was baiting him with the sexual predator thing, and I agree that she's had it in for Trump since the beginning. I don't blame her except that in her position, she should be able to rise above that kind of stuff. I just think it's her stock in trade and she's not about to abandon it and seek higher ground. She'll fight it out on the mud flats.
 
bubbabgone said:
I saw it when it happened.
Kelly lit the fuse when she used the term "sexual predator" in a question about Trump ... Gingrich didn't use the term first ... he just challenged her to use it about someone else and she didn't.
She could have asked her question without using that term which was definitely outrageous.
She was being deliberately inflammatory ... maybe she hasn't gotten over her earlier Trump fight.
Click to expand...

Newt was downright obnoxious. He acted like a petulant woman. Just because Elizabeth Warren is doing that doesn't mean Newt needs to follow suit. He actually makes Trump look bad.
 
Kal'Stang said:
From your article:



Is that time scale correct? If those networks had spent an equal amount of time talking about Hillary defending her pervert of a husband as much as they have about Trumps pervertedness do you think that she would be doing as well as she is in the polls? In fact, do you think that if those networks had spent an equal amount of time on both candidates period, do you think that either of them would have made it to where they are today?

I know that people on this forum LOVE to blame Trump for not only his idiocy (rightfully) but they also LOVE to make the claim that if the GOP had put forth someone other than Trump then Hillary wouldn't be "becoming President on election day". Always failing to acknowledge that it was just as much the Libs fault in her getting to where she is now as it is the Con's fault for letting Trump get as far as he has. Indeed we wouldn't be having as "close" a race as we are, whether you admit that its close or not, if EITHER side had put up someone other than who they put up.
Click to expand...

Is that time scale correct? I have no idea. Not sure why you're asking me. To be honest, I don't have the time to clock how many minutes each network devotes to topics. You'll have to do that yourself.

Why does anyone care about Bill Clinton's pervertedness? He isn't running for anything. We heard all about his sexcapades in 1998. This is 2016. Maybe people need to move on. Focus to today...and today is Trump, not Bill Clinton.

We have a "close" race because we have the 2 most hideous, unappealing morons running for that office. That's why I don't support either one. But I don't give a flying **** about Bill Clinton and his blow jobs. I haven't for almost 20 years. I'd say the perverts and sexually obsessed are the ones who can't stop talking about what happened 20+ years ago.
 
ocean515 said:
So the insults continue from the anti-Trumpoids.

Exactly what political party do they think will exist for them when their mission is complete?

I would suggest they consult the Green Party, or perhaps the Libertarians, for some tips on how to eek out relevancy when the majority they have vilified are no longer listening to them.
Click to expand...

You pro-Trumpers are free to start any political party you want. Who's stopping you? Maybe Trump, Bannon and Ailes can form a whole new party and put white men back in charge of everything. No clue, and I don't care. I wouldn't associate myself with those pieces of trash for anything.
 
tres borrachos said:
Did anyone else catch this last night? I'm in a hotel and with limited choices watched Megyn instead of the Series. I can't believe how low Gingrich has fallen. Everyone associated with Trump has become a caricature.

Gingrich: "You are fascinated with sex, and you don't care about public policy."

Kelly: "Me, really?"


Gingrich: "That's what I get out of watching you tonight."

Kelly: "You know, Mr. Speaker, I'm not fascinated by sex, but I am fascinated by the protection of women and understanding what we're getting in the Oval Office ..."

Gingrich: "You want a comment on whether the Clinton ticket has a relationship to a sexual predator? ... I want to hear you use the words 'Bill Clinton, sexual predator.' I dare you. Say 'Bill Clinton, sexual predator.'"

At the end of the segment, Kelly signed off with this: "We're going to have to leave it at that, and you can take your anger issues and spend some time working on them, Mr. Speaker."

Gingrich responded: "And you, too. You, too."


Newt Gingrich, Fox News''' Megyn Kelly Clash Over Trump Accusers - NBC News
Click to expand...

Is it just me or did Newt look really creepy there? His eyes were bulging and his head was going all over the place. You could almost see Trump pulling his strings!
 
Luvin' me some Kelly ever since he duked it out with the orange man. Shut up Newt.
 
Here's the reason Newt went off on Kelly: Trump's a jerk and a womanizer and we all know that. But why spend 90% of the time on that when Hillary's continued to ride the coattails of a sexual predator who actually stuck a cigar in a young woman in the Oval Office and has been accused of rape? Is Hillary really any better? And are issues like the speech she gave in South America at least as equally important as a porn star alleging Trump sexually harassed her or another woman claiming that she was okay with Trump feeling up her breasts but it became sexual harassment when he reached below her waist?
 
tres borrachos said:
Is that time scale correct? I have no idea. Not sure why you're asking me. To be honest, I don't have the time to clock how many minutes each network devotes to topics. You'll have to do that yourself.
Click to expand...

Your article. :shrug:

tres borrachos said:
Why does anyone care about Bill Clinton's pervertedness? He isn't running for anything. We heard all about his sexcapades in 1998. This is 2016. Maybe people need to move on. Focus to today...and today is Trump, not Bill Clinton.

We have a "close" race because we have the 2 most hideous, unappealing morons running for that office. That's why I don't support either one. But I don't give a flying **** about Bill Clinton and his blow jobs. I haven't for almost 20 years. I'd say the perverts and sexually obsessed are the ones who can't stop talking about what happened 20+ years ago.
Click to expand...

Think they're more concerned about Hillary defending his pervertedness.
 
tres borrachos said:
Newt was downright obnoxious. He acted like a petulant woman. Just because Elizabeth Warren is doing that doesn't mean Newt needs to follow suit. He actually makes Trump look bad.
Click to expand...

Newt was pissed because Kelly had just had a segment on media bias and he viewed Kelly as participating with her choice of words.
The bus video and the daily accusation coverage was beginning to wane and this provided an excuse to resuscitate it ... I guess that pissed him off too ... Trump constantly talking about suing the women doesn't help to let it fade either.
I used to like Kelly a lot before she began to think of herself as an everywoman and take herself way too seriously ... that phony ingratiating attitude with chuckles got irritating.
 
Crovax said:
It's is an actual quote.

"When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.” -DJT
Click to expand...

Don't dream of quoting out of context BS and expect it to taken seriously. Why did you edit his quote? Why did you just post the part the fraudulent media reported? We have enough frauds in the media already.

Here is the full context:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/06/16/full-text-donald-trump-announces-a-presidential-bid/

When do we beat Mexico at the border? They're laughing at us, at our stupidity. And now they are beating us economically. They are not our friend, believe me. But they're killing us economically.

The U.S. has become a dumping ground for everybody else's problems.

(APPLAUSE)

Thank you. It's true, and these are the best and the finest. When Mexico sends its people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

But I speak to border guards and they tell us what we're getting. And it only makes common sense. It only makes common sense. They're sending us not the right people.

It's coming from more than Mexico. It's coming from all over South and Latin America, and it's coming probably -- probably -- from the Middle East. But we don't know. Because we have no protection and we have no competence, we don't know what's happening. And it's got to stop and it's got to stop fast.​



And how did the media report Trumps comments about illegal immigration and illegal aliens?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/07/08/donald-trumps-false-comments-connecting-mexican-immigrants-and-crime/


Donald Trump’s false comments connecting Mexican immigrants and crime​


Donald Trump was talking about illegal aliens, not Mexican Immigrants.

You lie, just like Hillary's MSM partners.
 
Crovax said:
Besides the fact that it would cost twice as much as Trump's wall with an enormous upkeep cost on top of that, provide little benefit and be completely impossible to achieve in the time frame he set? Nothing at all
Click to expand...

I may be wrong, but I think Newt said Mexico will pay for it
 
tres borrachos said:
You pro-Trumpers are free to start any political party you want. Who's stopping you? Maybe Trump, Bannon and Ailes can form a whole new party and put white men back in charge of everything. No clue, and I don't care. I wouldn't associate myself with those pieces of trash for anything.
Click to expand...

I think you got the shoe on the wrong foot. Who is going to be left for the Republican Elites, when the majority of the membership have been so thoroughly abused and insulted?
 
No big deal newt just trying to become a member of the billion dollor playboy club sitting right up there with Roger and the Don. Smh so sad GOP.
 
ocean515 said:
Is it true some of the illegal aliens crossing the border have gone on to rape women?

The answer of course is yes.

Is it true some of the illegal aliens crossing the border have gone on to murder people. Without a doubt it's true.

Did Donald Trump say Mexican Immigrants are rapists and murderers?

The answer is absolutely false.
Click to expand...


Why do you keep asking this? You are the only one that has mentioned Trump saying/or not saying those exact words in this thread.

Are you hoping someone bites? Trump while referring to those coming across the border, stated that some were rapists, that is beyond dispute.

did he say the exact word - "Mexican Immigrants are rapists and murderers?" No.

But who cares? The point was he made a sweeping generalization about Mexico not sending their best, when he was talking about the tiniest percentage of those he was generalizing about.

I don't know the stats, but I doubt if the % of rapists among illegal immigrants is any higher or lower than that among the rest of the population.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom