• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Newsgate 2016 - Sharyl Attkisson

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fenton said:
Glass houses......

In another thread you were defending paid democrat operatives inciting violence at Trump events and then went on to claim their actions were legal because of " Citizens United "

You dont have much of a leg to stand on when it comes to criticizing someone else's intelligence.
Click to expand...

No I said coordinating activity is made legal by citizens united. I didn't say anything about violence.
 
ocean515 said:
I think the very long list of media sources shown to favor Hillary Clinton, and the sources of propaganda they accept from the multi-million dollar operatives attached to her political machine, is a big deal all voters should be paying attention to.

The Koch Brothers should be so lucky their pittance would have such play against the colossal effort and collusion on the left.
Click to expand...

Yet Trump tweets get more airtime??? Weird how that works.
 
bubbabgone said:
Start your own thread.
Here it's a diversion because you can't successfully challenge what Attkisson wrote.
Click to expand...

I did challenge her. You just didn't like what I said. How is a super pac working for Clinton attacking Clinton opponents, a smoking gun? in any way?
 
ModerateGOP said:
I did challenge her. You just didn't like what I said. How is a super pac working for Clinton attacking Clinton opponents, a smoking gun? in any way?
Click to expand...

Read the piece again and this time try to understand her points about collusion between Hillary's campaign and "journalists".
WAIT!!! ... first look up the definition of "collusion" then try to understand what you read.
I shouldn't have to keep telling you that so let's make this the last time ... 'kay?
 
bubbabgone said:
Read the piece again and this time try to understand her points about collusion between Hillary's campaign and "journalists".
WAIT!!! ... first look up the definition of "collusion" then try to understand what you read.
I shouldn't have to keep telling you that so let's make this the last time ... 'kay?
Click to expand...

From the quoted points in the OP, I am talking about Correct the Record here. It appears to be a super pac working with the media. Super pacs work with the media. This isn't new. Once again, you have failed to show me what the smoking gun is.
 
ModerateGOP said:
From the quoted points in the OP, I am talking about Correct the Record here. It appears to be a super pac working with the media. Super pacs work with the media. This isn't new. Once again, you have failed to show me what the smoking gun is.
Click to expand...

"News Media is corrupt, I fail to see why that is important, guys."

That is how I read your silly comment.

The issue here is the news media, ModerateGOP. The news media shouldn't be in the business of opinion laundering for political SuperPACs. How do you not understand this?
 
jmotivator said:
"News Media is corrupt, I fail to see why that is important, guys."

That is how I read your silly comment.

The issue here is the news media, ModerateGOP. The news media shouldn't be in the business of opinion laundering for political SuperPACs. How do you not understand this?
Click to expand...

Super pacs are allowed to work for the media. What is your solution to this?
 
ModerateGOP said:
Super pacs are allowed to work for the media. What is your solution to this?
Click to expand...

There are no laws requiring the news media to be unbiased, and I don't suggest making any such laws. Exposing those who want the credentials of being unbiased and trustworthy as frauds is all I want.

Dan Rather broke no laws but got what was coming to him.
 
jmotivator said:
"News Media is corrupt, I fail to see why that is important, guys."

That is how I read your silly comment.

The issue here is the news media, ModerateGOP. The news media shouldn't be in the business of opinion laundering for political SuperPACs. How do you not understand this?
Click to expand...

Do you believe that guy?
He's been told that the Citizen's United decision was an abomination and now he's got that notion crawling around in his craw.
While somehow he thinks Journalists conspiring with Super Pacs is just peachy.
I suppose the IRS conspiring with left wing groups is also fine with him.
 
bubbabgone said:
Do you believe that guy?
He's been told that the Citizen's United decision was an abomination and now he's got that notion crawling around in his craw.
While somehow he thinks Journalists conspiring with Super Pacs is just peachy.
I suppose the IRS conspiring with left wing groups is also fine with him.
Click to expand...

I see you don't have a solution to this supposed problem either.
 
jmotivator said:
There are no laws requiring the news media to be unbiased, and I don't suggest making any such laws. Exposing those who want the credentials of being unbiased and trustworthy as frauds is all I want.

Dan Rather broke no laws but got what was coming to him.
Click to expand...

Oh sorry I would think that if you have such a problem with this that you would have some inkling of an idea on how to fix it. No? So what's the point?
 
Tanngrisnir said:
It's from Sharyl Attkisson. A conspiracy loon of the first order.
Click to expand...

Well, no she's not a conspiracy loon. For example she still buys into the official 911 story.

Wait! Maybe you're right--believing that silly story DOES make her a conspiracy loon. :lol:
 
ModerateGOP said:
Oh sorry I would think that if you have such a problem with this that you would have some inkling of an idea on how to fix it. No? So what's the point?
Click to expand...

Do you support laws forcing partisanship standards on the press?
 
jmotivator said:
There are no laws requiring the news media to be unbiased, and I don't suggest making any such laws. Exposing those who want the credentials of being unbiased and trustworthy as frauds is all I want.

Dan Rather broke no laws but got what was coming to him.
Click to expand...

I wonder where media ends and superpac begins?
 
This is the most hilarious and pathetic self-immolation I've ever seen on this forum.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Resurrecting a 7 month old thread just to say this could be considered baiting. Please do not do this again. Thread is now closed.

Abbazorkzog said:
This is the most hilarious and pathetic self-immolation I've ever seen on this forum.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom