• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

CNN Propagandizing Heavily Against Guns Today

Vox

Voice and Wisdom of God
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
6,765
Reaction score
954
Location
Land of Logic
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
CNN's Fareed Zakariah today propagandizing about the Swiss liking guns but having a murder rate 15 times less than the U.S. due to strict gun control.

Wrong. Zakariah is biased and lying.

The Swiss have far fewer murders because they have far fewer blacks.....almost none.

In a typical year most murders in the U.S. are committed by young black men even though they are only 7% of the total population.

(Hillary called them "Super Predators.")

The only way to fix the problem is to put them in prison and keep them there.

Hillary called it "Bringing them to heel."

(Heel? Was that a dog whistle?)

CNNgo - CNN.com
 
Guns. What are they good for? Absolutely nothing.
 
CNN's Fareed Zakariah today propagandizing about the Swiss liking guns but having a murder rate 15 times less than the U.S. due to strict gun control.

Wrong. Zakariah is biased and lying.

The Swiss have far fewer murders because they have far fewer blacks.....almost none.

In a typical year most murders in the U.S. are committed by young black men even though they are only 7% of the total population.

(Hillary called them "Super Predators.")

The only way to fix the problem is to put them in prison and keep them there.

Hillary called it "Bringing them to heel."

(Heel? Was that a dog whistle?)

CNNgo - CNN.com

No racism here...nope, none at all.

But at least we know you agree with Hillary Clinton.
 
Last edited:
Guns. What are they good for? Absolutely nothing.

Hunting. Fun. Profit, if your good at shooting.

Defending your country.

Hmm. That's four things I could think of right off the top of my head.
 
CNN's Fareed Zakariah today propagandizing about the Swiss liking guns but having a murder rate 15 times less than the U.S. due to strict gun control.

Wrong. Zakariah is biased and lying.

The Swiss have far fewer murders because they have far fewer blacks.....almost none.

In a typical year most murders in the U.S. are committed by young black men even though they are only 7% of the total population.

(Hillary called them "Super Predators.")

The only way to fix the problem is to put them in prison and keep them there.

Hillary called it "Bringing them to heel."

(Heel? Was that a dog whistle?)

CNNgo - CNN.com

I know. Let's round up all of the blacks and send them to special prisons, just for blacks. Since they're obviously all criminals, it's time for a final solution to take care of the problem once and for all.
 
I know. Let's round up all of the blacks and send them to special prisons, just for blacks. Since they're obviously all criminals, it's time for a final solution to take care of the problem once and for all.

If only we constructed some labor camps where work would make them free...
 
Its not about blacks. It IS about gangs, thugs, and violent criminals...a large number of which happen to be black. I want to stress the first part...it is NOT about blacks. But if you just ram your head deeper up your own ass in your insistence in ignoring the facts...well...you only have yourself to blame for the view.
 
If only we constructed some labor camps where work would make them free...

I think there may be some left over from WWII, not really labor camps but they could be adapted. Manzanar comes to mind.
 
Hunting. Fun. Profit, if your good at shooting.

Defending your country.

Hmm. That's four things I could think of right off the top of my head.

Killing thugs who try to harm good people.
 
Its not about blacks. It IS about gangs, thugs, and violent criminals...a large number of which happen to be black. I want to stress the first part...it is NOT about blacks. But if you just ram your head deeper up your own ass in your insistence in ignoring the facts...well...you only have yourself to blame for the view.

Sorry, but the hard statistics prove it's about blacks.
 
I know. Let's round up all of the blacks and send them to special prisons, just for blacks. Since they're obviously all criminals, it's time for a final solution to take care of the problem once and for all.

Young black men are only about 7% of the total population and many of them are good citizens.......leaving only a tiny percentage that do criminal acts.

So the problem is clearly one to be addressed by taking the bad guys off the street--forever.

This is possible.

Political correctness prevents people from even TALKING about this reality.
 
Young black men are only about 7% of the total population and many of them are good citizens.......leaving only a tiny percentage that do criminal acts.

So the problem is clearly one to be addressed by taking the bad guys off the street--forever.

This is possible.

Political correctness prevents people from even TALKING about this reality.
What exactly are you proposing? Detail your plan.
 
Watching television news is an invitation to dull, plodding, dim-witted talking heads yammering on about whatever matters that their corporate masters and government mistresses dictate.

Accordingly, I do not watch television, and I most certainly do not watch television 'news broadcasts'.

If I am trapped in a doctor's office waiting room, and there is a television on, blaring such nonsense as CNN news or Fox news, I generally get up and turn the volume all the way down.
If anybody protests, I turn the volume halfway up, and retire to a waiting chair as far away from the vapid noise machine as humanly possible.

You can find some objective truth in the news, but you have to search a great number of internet news sources each day.
I myself review no less than ten internet news sites a day. Some domestic, and some international.
Then, knowing what I know about each site's political leanings and editorial policies, I can compare and contrast each news story, and how it is covered. (Or not covered at all.)

From all that, I can eventually divine the truth.

:2wave:
 
I think more and more reasonable people are realizing that the 2nd amendment needs to be repealed. It is going to take a very long time - perhaps a century before private ownership of guns is eradicated but it will happen. In the mean time we need to ratchet up the pressure with reasonable gun control measures.
 
I think more and more reasonable people are realizing that the 2nd amendment needs to be repealed. It is going to take a very long time - perhaps a century before private ownership of guns is eradicated but it will happen. In the mean time we need to ratchet up the pressure with reasonable gun control measures.

I agree.

Reasonable would be getting rid of all laws that abridge gun rights.
 
Watching television news is an invitation to dull, plodding, dim-witted talking heads yammering on about whatever matters that their corporate masters and government mistresses dictate.

Accordingly, I do not watch television, and I most certainly do not watch television 'news broadcasts'.

If I am trapped in a doctor's office waiting room, and there is a television on, blaring such nonsense as CNN news or Fox news, I generally get up and turn the volume all the way down.
If anybody protests, I turn the volume halfway up, and retire to a waiting chair as far away from the vapid noise machine as humanly possible.

You can find some objective truth in the news, but you have to search a great number of internet news sources each day.
I myself review no less than ten internet news sites a day. Some domestic, and some international.
Then, knowing what I know about each site's political leanings and editorial policies, I can compare and contrast each news story, and how it is covered. (Or not covered at all.)

From all that, I can eventually divine the truth.

:2wave:

LIE I bet you don't dare turn the TV volume down when other people are watching
 
within 5 years CNN will have gone the way of Newsweek.

Not likely americans are addicted to TV. But FAUX NEWS will go first unless the Murdoch Bros. make big changes. Their primary audience is elderly uneducated angry white people and thankfully they are dropping dead at a satisfactory rate.
 
Not likely americans are addicted to TV. But FAUX NEWS will go first unless the Murdoch Bros. make big changes. Their primary audience is elderly uneducated angry white people and thankfully they are dropping dead at a satisfactory rate.

I'm sure you have verifiable evidence to support this claim?
 
Enforce the law. Stop coddling criminals. That's all that's needed.

In other words, you really have no idea what you're talking about. Thanks.
 
Back
Top Bottom