That's such an intentional misrepresentation.
He got a BJ from an INTERN less than half his age in the Oval Office
Yes, an intern. And?
and then lied about it to a grand jury with an actual defense of "it depends what the definition of what the word "is" is...."
Yeah, that was pretty funny. But he wouldn't have lied if Republicans hadn't bothered to get him in front of that ridiculous, utterly irrelevant, complete waste of tax payer grand jury. If it were a real trial about anything halfway relevant to the American people's interests, I could see why people would be outraged. But this was a completely BS abuse of the legal system to find out if Bill was cheating on Hillary. That's Bill and Hillary's business, it's not my business, it's not your business. What's funnier is that half of the Republicans screaming the loudest about Bill were all themselves cheating on their wives.
I don't care what people do in their down time. If Bill smoked a pound of weed in his spare time, I don't care. If he and Hillary swung with lesbians whilst on magic mushrooms, I don't care. If he snorts cocaine off of Hillary's hoo-ha, I don't care. If Bill Clinton has orgies with 20 consenting interns, I don't care. If those were 20 male interns, I still wouldn't care. And I like it even less that the Republicans feel free to spend by now hundreds of millions of dollars of public money looking for scandals to help themselves politically, from Monica Lewiski to Benghazi.
(The only thing I
do care about was his s***ty presidency and the fact that he drug the Democratic party out to the right.
That I care about.)
Kinda different than just a BJ from Edna the admin.
Not really. At least, the differences are not relevant to the question of whether or not Bill Clinton has gone around raping 14 year old girls.
Now, after multiple accusations from women a la Bill Cosby, he's been proven to have travelled with a serial pedophile on a plane to an island where such acts occurred.
That's called guilt by association.
And you aren't at all bothered. You go into full defense mode.
I despise the Clinton's. It'd be politically great for me if this were a scandal, because it would remove Hillary from the running. But so far as I can tell, there's no scandal right now. I'm waiting for something more than conjecture, a witness whose changed their story many times and who is completely unrelated to the current story, and guilt by association.
If this story has evidence, and you present that evidence (and that means a witness or a testimony that Clinton raped a girl), I'll gladly promulgate the story. But right now, it's not a story. It's scurrilous conjecture.
