- Joined
- Jan 27, 2011
- Messages
- 39,195
- Reaction score
- 9,689
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
You may be right but he didn't necessarily argue about the general election. He didn't even link to who the NYT is endorsing because they actually did endorse Kasich and that would have blown his theory out of the water. It doesn't matter if it was primary season or not. I'm sure after Trump wiggles his way to the top, they will stand by their endorsement. You think his (will be) messy win will change that? Yeah riiiight! These things don't actually change once primary season is over. Look at the (few) newspapers who endorsed Romney during 2012. They didn't endorse Obama after Romney won the nomination. Silly Argument.
PS I'm not sure but you better not have been referring to me as low information voter. If you meant I was trying to educate low information voters by mentioning the Kasich endorsement you were right on track.
How few newspapers endorsed Romney plays into the liberal bias as Romney was more moderate than Obama by far.
No, my meaning was you were making the point about low information voters going for his reasoning. That's all.