• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Rachel Maddow's program experienced gigantic ratings growth....................

You DID make sure to mention the part about Fox News, you know. You don't get to bring something in an article up and then tell other people it isn't relevant. At least, not without looking like you've backed yourself into a corner.



Is that so!
 
Rachel Maddow's Ratings Up 92% As MSNBC Grows Twice As Fast As Fox News
Rachel Maddow's program experienced gigantic ratings growth the first quarter of 2016 as MSNBC's primetime audience grew more than twice as fast as Fox News.

“MSNBC’s primetime programming (M-F 8-11p) delivered strong growth for the quarter. In the A25-54 demo, MSNBC was up 112%, while Fox News grew 48% over the first quarter of 2015. “The Rachel Maddow Show” edged out CNN’s regular programming in A25-54 (279,000 vs. 277,000) and topped CNN in total viewers (1,166,000 vs. 877,000).” The Rachel Maddow Show” was up 92% in A25-54 and 48% in total viewers over the first quarter of 2015.

What MSNBC did was impressive. For the first time Fox News was the most watched basic cable network in both daytime and primetime, so for MSNBC to be growing faster than the most watched network on basic cable is quite an accomplishment…………”

The times are a changing…..

Up 92% from nothing is good I guess,
 
Up 92% from nothing is good I guess,

NOW THAT WAS A GOOD ONE..........:lamo


Have you noticed so folks here take things super important...............and seem to get their bowels in an uproar..................Go figure?
 
Did you catch this story yesterday?



And keep in mind, Fox being #1 in the first quarter of 2016 isn't just in cable news, but #1 in all cable networks for the quarter.


Here's a few stats from last weeks cable ratings:

Top five networks in primetime (total viewers):
TBS
Fox News Channel
HGTV
USA
AMC

Top five total-day networks (total viewers):
Fox News Channel
Nickelodeon
Adult Swim
Disney Channel
TBS


Top five cable news programs (total viewers):
1. Fox News Channel’s “The O’Reilly Factor” (Tuesday, 8 p.m.);
2. Fox News Channel’s “The O’Reilly Factor” (Wednesday, 8 p.m.);
3. Fox News Channel’s “Hannity” (Tuesday, 10 p.m.);
4. Fox News Channel’s “The O’Reilly Factor” (Monday, 8 p.m.);
5. Fox News Channel’s “America’s Election Headquarters” (Tuesday, 9 p.m.)

.

More people in this country watch football than anything else. Does that mean it's informative?
 
Rachel Maddow's Ratings Up 92% As MSNBC Grows Twice As Fast As Fox News
Rachel Maddow's program experienced gigantic ratings growth the first quarter of 2016 as MSNBC's primetime audience grew more than twice as fast as Fox News.

“MSNBC’s primetime programming (M-F 8-11p) delivered strong growth for the quarter. In the A25-54 demo, MSNBC was up 112%, while Fox News grew 48% over the first quarter of 2015. “The Rachel Maddow Show” edged out CNN’s regular programming in A25-54 (279,000 vs. 277,000) and topped CNN in total viewers (1,166,000 vs. 877,000).” The Rachel Maddow Show” was up 92% in A25-54 and 48% in total viewers over the first quarter of 2015.

What MSNBC did was impressive. For the first time Fox News was the most watched basic cable network in both daytime and primetime, so for MSNBC to be growing faster than the most watched network on basic cable is quite an accomplishment…………”

The times are a changing…..

LOL...

Last year Fox grew 10% and MSNBC dropped 39%. I don't know the proper comparative numbers, but Fox's 48% growth vs. MSNBC's 112% is likely still more added viewer.

321,000 x 0.48 = 154,080 added viewers.

132,000 x 1.12 = 147,840 added viewers.

When you're at the bottom, it's easier to change a higher percentage.

MSNBC Ratings Hit All-Time Lows In Q1 2015 | Deadline
 
LOL...

Last year Fox grew 10% and MSNBC dropped 39%. I don't know the proper comparative numbers, but Fox's 48% growth vs. MSNBC's 112% is likely still more added viewer.

321,000 x 0.48 = 154,080 added viewers.

132,000 x 1.12 = 147,840 added viewers.

When you're at the bottom, it's easier to change a higher percentage.

MSNBC Ratings Hit All-Time Lows In Q1 2015 | Deadline

Now it makes sense... Maddow in Q1 of 2015 had her worse quarter ratings ever, losing 46% of her 25-54 audience compared to Q1 of 2014. All Q1 of 2016 did was recover the viewers she lost last year.

If you compare her Q1 2016 audience, to her shows viewership 2 years ago in Q1 of 2014, what you find is, her show has had less than a 4% increase in viewership over the last 2 years... LMAO

Good catch planar

The times they are a changin' indeed... Right phony conservative yoda dude?
 
Now it makes sense... Maddow in Q1 of 2015 had her worse quarter ratings ever, losing 46% of her 25-54 audience compared to Q1 of 2014. All Q1 of 2016 did was recover the viewers she lost last year.

If you compare her Q1 2016 audience, to her shows viewership 2 years ago in Q1 of 2014, what you find is, her show has had less than a 4% increase in viewership over the last 2 years... LMAO

Good catch planar

The times they are a changin' indeed... Right phony conservative yoda dude?
It's easy to catch these liberal misconceptions.

If it's too good to be true, it probably is.
 
LOL...

Last year Fox grew 10% and MSNBC dropped 39%. I don't know the proper comparative numbers, but Fox's 48% growth vs. MSNBC's 112% is likely still more added viewer.

321,000 x 0.48 = 154,080 added viewers.

132,000 x 1.12 = 147,840 added viewers.

When you're at the bottom, it's easier to change a higher percentage.

MSNBC Ratings Hit All-Time Lows In Q1 2015 | Deadline

All you folks.............what's this with Faux?...............Don't you know Ailes is playing yall for suckers? You should try programing not designed to dumb yall down!
 
All you folks.............what's this with Faux?...............Don't you know Ailes is playing yall for suckers? You should try programing not designed to dumb yall down!

If you call them Faux, are you equally fair with something defamatory for CNN, MSNBC, etc?

The simple truth is that Fox has the best ratings because they are just about the only conservative viewpoint. Most the rest of the M$M's are liberal biased.
 
If you call them Faux, are you equally fair with something defamatory for CNN, MSNBC, etc?

The simple truth is that Fox has the best ratings because they are just about the only conservative viewpoint. Most the rest of the M$M's are liberal biased.


Is the conservative point of view to lie?

Or is it to tell news as you want to hear it.............not as it is?


MSM liberal?....................What a bunch of hogwash that it..................MSM has not been liberal since Eye Witness TV news came on the scene some 40 years ago...................most folks have NO IDEA of what real news is.............

Go watch/listen your Faux Noise and get further dumbed down..............Why should yall be any different than most of the rest of America?


OMG..........yall wouldn't know what liberal was unless someone told you what/where/who it was
 
Is the conservative point of view to lie?

Or is it to tell news as you want to hear it.............not as it is?


MSM liberal?....................What a bunch of hogwash that it..................MSM has not been liberal since Eye Witness TV news came on the scene some 40 years ago...................most folks have NO IDEA of what real news is.............

Go watch/listen your Faux Noise and get further dumbed down..............Why should yall be any different than most of the rest of America?


OMG..........yall wouldn't know what liberal was unless someone told you what/where/who it was

I don't know what they speak of today. I haven't listened to such programming for probably at least a decade. It all sickens me. When I did listen, I listened to Fox and CNN. I was always able to verify the facts of Fox, but found questionable material in CNN. I found the programs tailored to conservative or liberal by network, and the named shows like Glen Beck.. often exaggerated, or outright lies. I found the actual news itself, more accurate on Fox than any other network.

Every now and again, I see the news networks. I'm just not a regular viewer. If you think there is no liberal bias, then you are far enough to the left, that their center is the same as yours.

Today, they is still, mostly liberal bias in the networks.
 
Is the conservative point of view to lie?

Or is it to tell news as you want to hear it.............not as it is?


MSM liberal?....................What a bunch of hogwash that it..................MSM has not been liberal since Eye Witness TV news came on the scene some 40 years ago...................most folks have NO IDEA of what real news is.............

Go watch/listen your Faux Noise and get further dumbed down..............Why should yall be any different than most of the rest of America?


OMG..........yall wouldn't know what liberal was unless someone told you what/where/who it was

Yikes.

th
 
I don't know what they speak of today. I haven't listened to such programming for probably at least a decade. It all sickens me. When I did listen, I listened to Fox and CNN. I was always able to verify the facts of Fox, but found questionable material in CNN. I found the programs tailored to conservative or liberal by network, and the named shows like Glen Beck.. often exaggerated, or outright lies. I found the actual news itself, more accurate on Fox than any other network.

Every now and again, I see the news networks. I'm just not a regular viewer. If you think there is no liberal bias, then you are far enough to the left, that their center is the same as yours.

Today, they is still, mostly liberal bias in the networks.


Verify Faux?


Listen to the adjectives used and questions with implied answers............and read up on the basics of propaganda.............then get back to me

Trust me..........they are playing yall for suckers
 
Verify Faux?


Listen to the adjectives used and questions with implied answers............and read up on the basics of propaganda.............then get back to me

Trust me..........they are playing yall for suckers

LOL...

Zero direct examples.

Sorry, not very believable.

Glen beck was the only one I didn't like when I watched it.

Again, I don't know about today, but your lack of an explicit response says volumes.
 
I don't know what they speak of today. I haven't listened to such programming for probably at least a decade. It all sickens me. When I did listen, I listened to Fox and CNN. I was always able to verify the facts of Fox, but found questionable material in CNN. I found the programs tailored to conservative or liberal by network, and the named shows like Glen Beck.. often exaggerated, or outright lies. I found the actual news itself, more accurate on Fox than any other network.

Every now and again, I see the news networks. I'm just not a regular viewer. If you think there is no liberal bias, then you are far enough to the left, that their center is the same as yours.

Today, they is still, mostly liberal bias in the networks.


there is no way to verify facts on FOX, way too many lies, and just plain obvious lies. you never verified diddly.
 
LOL...

Last year Fox grew 10% and MSNBC dropped 39%. I don't know the proper comparative numbers, but Fox's 48% growth vs. MSNBC's 112% is likely still more added viewer.

321,000 x 0.48 = 154,080 added viewers.

132,000 x 1.12 = 147,840 added viewers.

When you're at the bottom, it's easier to change a higher percentage.

MSNBC Ratings Hit All-Time Lows In Q1 2015 | Deadline

Reminds me of the old days when a store would have a big sale after covertly raising the prices the weeks before.
 
Maddow is your typical smug, know it all, arrogant, disrespectful, obnoxious liberal elitist. It's surprising so many of her own kind can't stand her either.
 
LOL...

Zero direct examples.

Sorry, not very believable.

Glen beck was the only one I didn't like when I watched it.

Again, I don't know about today, but your lack of an explicit response says volumes.

Volumes ......like what?


Or are you too into the guessing game.................I should guess what you mean?
 
YES.........I know............But it was off subject.............If you want to talk comparisons.............start another subject string

Off subject? Perhaps you misplace your initial post?

"What MSNBC did was impressive. For the first time Fox News was the most watched basic cable network in both daytime and primetime, so for MSNBC to be growing faster than the most watched network on basic cable is quite an accomplishment…………” imyoda
 
Last edited:
Off subject? Perhaps you misplace your initial post?

"What MSNBC did was impressive. For the first time Fox News was the most watched basic cable network in both daytime and primetime, so for MSNBC to be growing faster than the most watched network on basic cable is quite an accomplishment…………” imyoda

Perhaps.........
 
Rachel Maddow's Ratings Up 92% As MSNBC Grows Twice As Fast As Fox News
Rachel Maddow's program experienced gigantic ratings growth the first quarter of 2016 as MSNBC's primetime audience grew more than twice as fast as Fox News.

“MSNBC’s primetime programming (M-F 8-11p) delivered strong growth for the quarter. In the A25-54 demo, MSNBC was up 112%, while Fox News grew 48% over the first quarter of 2015. “The Rachel Maddow Show” edged out CNN’s regular programming in A25-54 (279,000 vs. 277,000) and topped CNN in total viewers (1,166,000 vs. 877,000).” The Rachel Maddow Show” was up 92% in A25-54 and 48% in total viewers over the first quarter of 2015.

What MSNBC did was impressive. For the first time Fox News was the most watched basic cable network in both daytime and primetime, so for MSNBC to be growing faster than the most watched network on basic cable is quite an accomplishment…………”

The times are a changing…..
For those of you with math problems here is a tip-a lower performing network can increase by a larger percentage and STILL have a lower increase in the number of people watching. For example, if Fox News averaged 483,000 viewers in the 25-54 age group after their 50% gain they picked up, at 50%, 161,000 more viewers. And if MSNBC had 231,000 after a 92% increase they added 110,000 viewers, or 50,000 less than Fox.
It is important to understand this type of math, especially in your personal finances. The more you have, the more you gain, even with small percentage increases.

The 25-to-54 age group is most important to news advertisers. In that category, Fox News averaged 483,000 viewers to CNN's 462,000 and MSNBC's 231,000. All were up: Fox News 50 percent, CNN 139 percent and MSNBC 69 percent.
Fox News, CNN, MSNBC enjoy boom - Orlando Sentinel
 
For those of you with math problems here is a tip-a lower performing network can increase by a larger percentage and STILL have a lower increase in the number of people watching. For example, if Fox News averaged 483,000 viewers in the 25-54 age group after their 50% gain they picked up, at 50%, 161,000 more viewers. And if MSNBC had 231,000 after a 92% increase they added 110,000 viewers, or 50,000 less than Fox.
It is important to understand this type of math, especially in your personal finances. The more you have, the more you gain, even with small percentage increases.


Fox News, CNN, MSNBC enjoy boom - Orlando Sentinel

Too many people appear not to understand such simple concepts. Probably why I have to pay so much in taxes so they can have TANF, SNAP, section 8 housing, etc.
 
back in the day i had a guy on my team who was hitting .120. In the last 5 games he got 8 hits and raised his average to .153. That was a 128% increase but he still finished with a .153 ba.

wtf????:lamo Math isn't your thing is it?
 
Back
Top Bottom