• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

More staffers leaving Breitbart, citing "Party Line Trump Propaganda"

Erod said:
And George Soros and his hired hooligans haven't been?
Click to expand...

Wow, what a lame response. Stick to the actual subject...

Breitbart has always been a cesspool of angry cranks, and made up propaganda.
 
beefheart said:
Wow, what a lame response. Stick to the actual subject...

Breitbart has always been a cesspool of angry cranks, and made up propaganda.
Click to expand...

Yet you swear by media matters, I'm sure.
 
Erod said:
Yet you swear by media matters, I'm sure.
Click to expand...

Yet another idiotic post which has nothing to do with the topic.

You are on a roll today.
 
It was a propoganda outlet from the start.

Their biggest hit was a video about ACORN that turned out to be fraudlently edited (and omitted the fact that the employee actually called the police right after to report the conversation), the creator of which ultimately having to settle for $100,000.

They were designed specifically to attack Obama and the left, and that's what they did.
 
tres borrachos said:
Okay, but I haven't seen any assault in the videos yet. I have bruises on my body today too. We cleaned out our shed this weekend. Nobody grabbed me.
Click to expand...

Independent witnesses, from other news orgs.
 
JANFU said:
Independent witnesses, from other news orgs.
Click to expand...

I am aware of one other independent witness, not "witnesses", from one other news org, the Washington Post, in spite of there being many dozens of people right there. Please post who these other witnesses from other news organizations are.
 
tres borrachos said:
I am aware of one other independent witness, not "witnesses", from one other news org, the Washington Post, in spite of there being many dozens of people right there. Please post who these other witnesses from other news organizations are.
Click to expand...

I understood there was more than 1- will look later
 
tres borrachos said:
I am aware of one other independent witness, not "witnesses", from one other news org, the Washington Post, in spite of there being many dozens of people right there. Please post who these other witnesses from other news organizations are.
Click to expand...

I did not forget to get back to you. You are correct, only 1 witness.
 
JANFU said:
I did not forget to get back to you. You are correct, only 1 witness.
Click to expand...

And that one witness is someone who hates Trump. The video evidence is laughable which is why nobody in the media is talking about this non-story.
 
Mr Person said:
It was a propoganda outlet from the start.

Their biggest hit was a video about ACORN that turned out to be fraudlently edited (and omitted the fact that the employee actually called the police right after to report the conversation), the creator of which ultimately having to settle for $100,000.

They were designed specifically to attack Obama and the left, and that's what they did.
Click to expand...

As long as the Corporate Class Propaganda Machine is still functioning having alternative propaganda is a win for democracy.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
As long as the Corporate Class Propaganda Machine is still functioning having alternative propaganda is a win for democracy.
Click to expand...

I think there are a lot more trustworthy alternate media sites than Breitbart, is the thing...


Anyway, I'll no more listen to them than I would Dan Rather.
 
Mr Person said:
I think there are a lot more trustworthy alternate media sites than Breitbart, is the thing...


Anyway, I'll no more listen to them than I would Dan Rather.
Click to expand...

I agree, but the only sensable thing to do these days is to consume news from many different sources, and many different kinds of sources. Think of it like sensible eating, a wide variety diet, and not a lot of any one thing. Breitbart is useful, when most US and Global media is intently hostile to Trump and for the most part has not understood his appeal Breitbart has more or less gotten it. I never looked at it till this election, so I have nothing to say about it other than how it has reported Trump, the rest might be crap, IDK.
 
reinoe said:
And that one witness is someone who hates Trump. The video evidence is laughable which is why nobody in the media is talking about this non-story.
Click to expand...

Have you a link to the video?
 
JANFU said:
I did not forget to get back to you. You are correct, only 1 witness.
Click to expand...

I'm kind of a big fan of believing more witnesses in a room filled with potential witnesses. The Wapo guy, watching this supposed assault, immediately starting babbling about "using this in his story". If she was really assaulted, as she & he claim, his story is the most important thing? Seriously? Not her well being?

The whole thing to me stinks to high Heaven, and considering I can't see Lewandowki's hands and her arms in the video clips, I have no choice but to say I don't believe it.
 
tres borrachos said:
I'm kind of a big fan of believing more witnesses in a room filled with potential witnesses. The Wapo guy, watching this supposed assault, immediately starting babbling about "using this in his story". If she was really assaulted, as she & he claim, his story is the most important thing? Seriously? Not her well being?

The whole thing to me stinks to high Heaven, and considering I can't see Lewandowki's hands and her arms in the video clips, I have no choice but to say I don't believe it.
Click to expand...
Fair enough.
 
tres borrachos said:
I'm kind of a big fan of believing more witnesses in a room filled with potential witnesses. The Wapo guy, watching this supposed assault, immediately starting babbling about "using this in his story". If she was really assaulted, as she & he claim, his story is the most important thing? Seriously? Not her well being?

The whole thing to me stinks to high Heaven, and considering I can't see Lewandowki's hands and her arms in the video clips, I have no choice but to say I don't believe it.
Click to expand...


Lewandowki is caught on film doing it again...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/vide...69dec4-eeda-11e5-a2a3-d4e9697917d1_video.html
 
No Moot.
This is a separate and different incident and does not involve the same alleged behavior so it can not be "doing it again".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom