• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Hillary email reveals media manipulation.

Jack Fabulous

Friend Zone
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Messages
16,948
Reaction score
6,740
Location
midwest
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Emails appear to show how key Clinton aide manipulated media coverage | Fox News


A newly released email exchange from 2009 shows how a key Hillary Clinton aide strong-armed a prominent political reporter into glowing coverage of the then-secretary of state.

The email chain, released to Gawker in response to a Freedom of Information Request, is between longtime Clinton loyalist Philippe Reines and Atlantic reporter Marc Ambinder. Ambinder starts off the correspondence by asking for an advance copy of a speech on the Obama administration’s policies Clinton was due to give to the Council on Foreign Relations.

Reines obliges on three conditions:

1) You in your own voice describe them as “muscular”

2) You note that a look at the CFR seating plan shows that all the envoys — from Holbrooke to Mitchell to Ross — will be arrayed in front of her, which in your own clever way you can say certainly not a coincidence and meant to convey something

3) You don’t say you were blackmailed!

After responding, “got it,” Ambinder dutifully filed a story whose introduction followed Reines’ orders to a T.

I'm not naive enough to believe that situations like this are unique to Hillary Clinton but it sure doesn't do much to boost her already abysmal reputation for honesty and credibility.
 
Strong armed a journalist? Pics or didn't happen.
 
Emails appear to show how key Clinton aide manipulated media coverage | Fox News

I'm not naive enough to believe that situations like this are unique to Hillary Clinton but it sure doesn't do much to boost her already abysmal reputation for honesty and credibility.

I read about this earlier today, and what's stuck with me is what the journalist, Ambinder, said about "transactional journalism": [In an email to Gawker], "It made me uncomfortable then, and it makes me uncomfortable today. And when I look at that email record, it is a reminder to me of why I moved away from all that. The Atlantic, to their credit, never pushed me to do that, to turn into a scoop factory. In the fullness of time, any journalist or writer who is confronted by the prospect, or gets in the situation where their journalism begins to feel transactional, should listen to their gut feeling and push away from that." In Exchange for Scoop, Hillary Team Dictated Reporter's Story | The Weekly Standard

BTW, screenshot/e-mail from Clinton's spokesperson Phillipe Reines available at the link.
 
Emails appear to show how key Clinton aide manipulated media coverage | Fox News
I'm not naive enough to believe that situations like this are unique to Hillary Clinton but it sure doesn't do much to boost her already abysmal reputation for honesty and credibility.

Some people are naive or morally bankrupt enough to overlook, deny, not believe or rationalize anything Hillary does. They have a vested interest in trying to keep that hag around at any cost.
 
Like pics would actually matter.:lamo

In the link that nota bene posted the guy admits it. That isn't even enough for Moot. If Shrillay admitted to it Moot would deny it.
 
In the link that nota bene posted the guy admits it. That isn't even enough for Moot. If Shrillay admitted to it Moot would deny it.

It would be viewed as an extraordinary act of self-sacrifice by Hillary to save Ambinder's job for him.
 
It would be viewed as an extraordinary act of self-sacrifice by Hillary to save Ambinder's job for him.

He learned from it and he won't lose his job. When he plays in poo he smells like poo. They didn't ask him to do it. Nothing in it for her. :)

In an email to Gawker, Ambinder said, "It made me uncomfortable then, and it makes me uncomfortable today. And when I look at that email record, it is a reminder to me of why I moved away from all that. The Atlantic, to their credit, never pushed me to do that, to turn into a scoop factory. In the fullness of time, any journalist or writer who is confronted by the prospect, or gets in the situation where their journalism begins to feel transactional, should listen to their gut feeling and push away from that."
 
Last edited:
The only reason we hear about this at all now is because the establishment has lost control of the media. This has probably gone on as long as there has been media and politicians. But media used to be restricted to a few very large outlets, which made it easier to control. Now the media is hundreds of small outlets, including social media sites, and impossible to control. Hell, its difficult to even influence. Look at how Shillary has tried to spin things over the last few months and it didn't take. 20 years ago she would have had 2 or 3 articles circulating in the major outlets portraying things in the exact light she wanted. Now, it's hard to push a particular interpretation, and its hard to suppress an idea and keep it from surfacing, especially when its obvious enough that several sources notice it independently. This is an example of how its always been, and us hearing about it at all is an example of how things have changed. 20 years ago, hard proof or not, no media outlet would have allowed this to be known, never mind broadcast it. Now, when big media tries to do things the old way, small media exposes, embarrasses, and erodes their overall credibility. It has brought about a new element of accountability, which while it isn't as strong as it should be, I only expect to continue to grow as more and more independent outlets fact check, investigate, whistle blow, and call out the establishment and the establishment-owned on their long standing bull**** arrangements.

:rantoff:
 
The only reason we hear about this at all now is because the establishment has lost control of the media. This has probably gone on as long as there has been media and politicians. But media used to be restricted to a few very large outlets, which made it easier to control. Now the media is hundreds of small outlets, including social media sites, and impossible to control. Hell, its difficult to even influence. Look at how Shillary has tried to spin things over the last few months and it didn't take. 20 years ago she would have had 2 or 3 articles circulating in the major outlets portraying things in the exact light she wanted. Now, it's hard to push a particular interpretation, and its hard to suppress an idea and keep it from surfacing, especially when its obvious enough that several sources notice it independently. This is an example of how its always been, and us hearing about it at all is an example of how things have changed. 20 years ago, hard proof or not, no media outlet would have allowed this to be known, never mind broadcast it. Now, when big media tries to do things the old way, small media exposes, embarrasses, and erodes their overall credibility. It has brought about a new element of accountability, which while it isn't as strong as it should be, I only expect to continue to grow as more and more independent outlets fact check, investigate, whistle blow, and call out the establishment and the establishment-owned on their long standing bull**** arrangements.

:rantoff:

Not just the media, it's us. We can take information from all this new media, and spread it like wildfire.

That's awesome, and it's problematic, too. It's hard to vet it all out and know what's true and reported with integrity, and what's propaganda to run interference.

Fortunately, we're starting to figure it out, if it's not too late.
 
Read up on Teddy Roosevelt if you want to hear about media manipulation....
 
Back
Top Bottom