• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, not Donald Trump, are on ISIS recruiting video

Grant said:
People dissed George Bush for Iraq also, yet it had Hillary's support. She is a hawk, if that's the way the wind blows.
Click to expand...

And hawks only bother you if they're Democrats.
 
Fearandloathing said:
Bull****.

Your usual lies can't help you here.

These are your exact words:


RedState is a conservative propaganda organ.

That is a direct implication ..if not, then it has nothing to do with this thread, so
why the **** did you even post if NOT to imply?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...




'Imply' means to hint or suggest something, look it up in a dictionary. I didn't hint or suggest anything I flat out said that RedState is a conservative propaganda organ which it is.

:lol:
 
Grant said:
People dissed George Bush for Iraq also, yet it had Hillary's support. She is a hawk, if that's the way the wind blows.
Click to expand...

Well at least that is something you can like about her and another good reason for independents not to take a chance on some newbie. Plus she would never get us into another quagmire in the M.E. like any of the GOP candidates will.
 
This thread goes about like you would expect.
1. Hillary Clinton lied in her claim that ISIS was using Donald Trump in recruiting videos.
2. The facts are shown that while Trump does not show up in their recruitment video, Bill Clinton and Barrack Obama do.
3. Liberals rush in to make this about everything but the fact that Hillary Clinton lied.
 
VanceMack said:
This thread goes about like you would expect.
1. Hillary Clinton lied in her claim that ISIS was using Donald Trump in recruiting videos.
2. The facts are shown that while Trump does not show up in their recruitment video, Bill Clinton and Barrack Obama do.
3. Liberals rush in to make this about everything but the fact that Hillary Clinton lied.
Click to expand...

Just like the sun is going to come up in the morning.
 
Sisyphus said:
How do you know? If lies, correct them. Simply calling what you don't like a lie is a waste of your day.

Bring something or go to your room.
Click to expand...

You mean like you've done??

And to reiterate. I have not claimed nor even hinted at the notion that Brit and US oil was successful in getting control in their overtly greedy (patiently idiotic) constitution they supplied via our puppet president select. The assembly rejected it summarily and the feeble attempt was what turned the people against the US, taking us from perceived liberator to despised occupier wanting to exploit their oil resources.
Click to expand...

Ahh, so now you start backing away from your ludicrous claims. Hilarious.

You made the claim, it's up to you to prove it.
 
rocket88 said:
So it's a great policy....unless a Democrat says it! Par for the course.
Click to expand...

Was Rubio in Obama's war room advising him??

And where did I claim it was great policy?

answer: no where.
 
iguanaman said:
It just seemed strange to diss Hillary for Libya when her policy was fully in line with just about every GOP candidate. Perhaps you are more Libertarian than Republican? Yes I will be voting for Hillary along with a landslide of others now that she has no real opposition from the GOP.
I find it funny that a lot of Republicans are accusing Hillary of being a Hawk thus losing another difference between her and whomever they choose as nominee. Wouldn't it be better to accent the differences between candidates instead of how alike they are?
Click to expand...

I do have some libertarian leanings.

You say you will vote for Hillary. Do you approve of every single one of her positions ???

Why do you expect Republicans to agree 100% with their candidates?
 
Gill said:
Was Rubio in Obama's war room advising him??

And where did I claim it was great policy?

answer: no where.
Click to expand...

You basically admit that the policy didn't bother you coming from Rubio. Only out of Clinton's mouth.
 
iguanaman said:
Well at least that is something you can like about her and another good reason for independents not to take a chance on some newbie. Plus she would never get us into another quagmire in the M.E. like any of the GOP candidates will.
Click to expand...
Yes, it would have been something I could like about her if she later wasn't critical of the war and tried removing herself from her decision. beside having very flexible convictions she is also a natural liar and, more recently, accused a political opponents of recruiting Muslims for ISIS. Anyther lie, of course, but this was more dangerous and anti American.

This woman doesn't even deserve to be a candidate, much less president but, as someone once said, 'no one has ever gone broke underestimating the intelligence of a leftist electorate'.
 
I would think something different would be more interesting. Presumably challenging my asserted facts, supporting the disagreement with what you believe to be factual.

Or just come back tomorrow and ask some other insignificant and foolish question to actively avoid what you seem unable to counter.

Or do nothing, more efficiently: just move on to something you can participate in leaving things alone that are over your head. That would be my preferred option, were I caught up in something to which I was ignorant and too lazy to get informed before responding to someone who is informed.

But I would never dream of suggesting you choose as I would.

Be your own guide.
 
Last edited:
Gill said:
You mean like you've done??



Ahh, so now you start backing away from your ludicrous claims. Hilarious.

You made the claim, it's up to you to prove it.
Click to expand...
The above quick reply was in response to this.
 
Gill said:
You mean like you've done??



Ahh, so now you start backing away from your ludicrous claims. Hilarious.

You made the claim, it's up to you to prove it.
Click to expand...
Missed this added false assumption.

No. Note is states I never said. If you misread me, you might think that in error. But had I said it, surely you would have pointed to my contradiction. And being wrong is a poor substitute. Not responding would have been better by far.

But do go on. This is so easy I am happy to help you see your folly. Were it more tasking, my help would be less certain. So fingers crossed it raises your game a bit seeing how dearly it needs raising.

Merry Xmas.
 
Sisyphus said:
I would think something different would be more interesting. Presumably challenging my asserted facts, supporting the disagreement with what you believe to be factual.

Or just come back tomorrow and ask some other insignificant and foolish question to actively avoid what you seem unable to counter.

Or do nothing, more efficiently: just move on to something you can participate in leaving things alone that are over your head. That would be my preferred option, were I caught up in something to which I was ignorant and too lazy to get informed before responding to someone who is informed.

But I would never dream of suggesting you choose as I would.

Be your own guide.
Click to expand...

I'm glad you came to your senses and agree that you should abandone your senseless claims.

Ignorant claims about matters you are oblivious of would be embarrassing so I understand your reticence and refusal to prove your silly claims.

Come back when you have an actual point to make.

Merry Christmas.
 
Gill said:
I'm glad you came to your senses and agree that you should abandone your senseless claims.

Ignorant claims about matters you are oblivious of would be embarrassing so I understand your reticence and refusal to prove your silly claims.

Come back when you have an actual point to make.

Merry Christmas.
Click to expand...
Still debating the convenient and baseless assertions of what I am doing or saying, which we both know are utterly false and lame avoidance tactics. So what's in it for you? Pride, via some jab and run bandaid for your tarnished pride? That's the only thing I can think might be a motive.

And you gotta fear it's merely adding to your embarrassment. And it is, if anyone but you or I are reading our pointless repartee. That's doubtful. So why BS your way out, when we both know what it is?

This cannot be enjoyable, which these debates begin and end with in terms of meaningful benefits.

Anyway, have a nice day tomorrow. We'll talk again, no doubt. So till later, you getting the last word notwithstanding, should you respond to this.

Bye for now.
 
jmotivator said:
It Is Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, Not Donald Trump, In An ISIS Recruiting Video [VIDEO] | RedState

Honestly, Hillary Clinton can't get out of her own way.
Click to expand...

11202656_1306340392759420_9190599801508011167_n.jp g
 
GOP would like us to forget they gave us Bush 2 I have a long memory lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom