• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New York Times Front Editorializes on Front Page

Charles Cooke makes fools out NYT editorial board.
Obama and the New York Times Are Hypocrites

Last year , they were aghast at the no-fly list.

This year , a little different story.

They see little Barry's legacy going down in flames and they are desparately trying to make hime look relevant.

Not to mention propping up the current sadsack crew of Democrats. ( Granny and Gramps)
 
Mr Person said:
Nobody is unbiased....

Hence, no paper is unbiased....
Click to expand...

For the most part, NYT is a decent source for information, as compared to say 0-Hedge or WND. But, that she leans Left would be an understatement. I don't see that as a problem though.
 
The NYTimes has been running front page editorials for some time now.
 
jonny5 said:
This is the most obvious evidence of bias yet. Rather than hiding their opinions on their editorial page and in their articles, they have now moved their bias to the front page, and boldy acknowledged it. The rest of the media even displayed some alarm at this (all the while trying to agree with it in their own papers)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...front-page-but-does-that-even-help-the-cause/
Click to expand...

I think I've done a thread on this. The country's changing. The NYTimes owns their own paper, and after over 100 Pulitzer prizes for journalism, I think that they can run an editorial on the front page if they want. What you might think about it means nothing to its quality OR its impact. Other outlets expressed concern because the drastic nature of doing it, but the crises warrants it: we're have too many mass shootings in this country and the right-wing doesn't care because they think guns a re neat!

I would argue that the irresponsibility of the wight-wing and anti American groups like the NRA are precisely the reason the choice was made to front page.
 
jet57 said:
I think I've done a thread on this. The country's changing. The NYTimes owns their own paper, and after over 100 Pulitzer prizes for journalism, I think that they can run an editorial on the front page if they want. What you might think about it means nothing to its quality OR its impact. Other outlets expressed concern because the drastic nature of doing it, but the crises warrants it: we're have too many mass shootings in this country and the right-wing doesn't care because they think guns a re neat!

I would argue that the irresponsibility of the wight-wing and anti American groups like the NRA are precisely the reason the choice was made to front page.
Click to expand...

So long as they dont try to maintain this reputation of unbiased news reporting, I dont have an issue with it. They can come out in the open.
 
jonny5 said:
So long as they dont try to maintain this reputation of unbiased news reporting, I dont have an issue with it. They can come out in the open.
Click to expand...

I don't see common sense as biased.
 
jonny5 said:
So long as they dont try to maintain this reputation of unbiased news reporting, I dont have an issue with it. They can come out in the open.
Click to expand...

So, any news organization that has any editorials is inherently bias?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom