Horsepucky. The comment was right on target. Terrorists are exactly like rabid dogs, they try to bite you for no reason and whenever they get their paws on someone their disease is in danger of being transmitted.
God Bless Donald Trump and Ben Carson, and everyone else who's willing to speak the truth louder than the PC Gasp Machine.
Dude - not only are they rabid dogs, these scumbag terrorists need to be exterminated, just like you'd shoot a rabid dog. Shoot them dead, kill every last man woman and child.
Our Jackass-in-Chief thnks we can "contain" people like that, but we can't. If we were any good at "containing" them, they wouldn't just have bombed Paris, and we wouldn't have had a 9/11, and right now the country of Belgium and the city of Brussels wouldn't be terrorized into a state of complete lockdown.
Dammit, we pay our military 700 billion dollars a year, and I am entirely certain they can take out 50,000 fanatical extremists. I say we let 'em do it. Now. Quickly. Before our "containment" plans end up failing again, and they end up bombing Canada next, or Puerto Rico, or even Los Angeles.
Our Idiot-in-Chief is completely incompetent as a defender of national security. He's shaking in his boots at the idea of "occupying" a part of the Middle East again. He's pulled off 75% of our air sorties against ISIS 'cause he's scared of shooting a few civilians. And meanwhile, every minute our "containment" policy continues to fail, is a minute that Abdul and Mohammed get to catch a plane through Turkey or wander up through Greece so they can cause more damage someplace new.
Yeah, they're rabid dogs, and they need to be shot dead like any rabid dog would be shot.
And after that, we can wrap their bodies in bacon and stick a football in their dead hands and leave their dead bodies for the maggots.
I want these people dead. You understand that, right? I pay my government to take people like this off the planet.
Do we or do we not have a military, and an intelligence community, and a desire to maintain some semblance of stability in the world in the interest of national security?
Blowbama's been twiddling his butt for nine whole months, he had a window of opportunity and he missed it. Now he's dealing with the consequences.
Even Robert Kagan is scared shirtless about the idea of "occupying" any part of the Middle East.
And I repeat, do we or do we not care about national security and the stability of the world?
Anyone with a brain cell and at least one 'nad is going to occupy, and occupy again, and keep occupying until those fools show the world they're capable of governing themselves.
Which includes protecting their people against forces like ISIS.
ISIS is a clear and immediate and very present threat to all of humanity and every single country on the planet.
They need to be wiped out. I don't want them in jail, I don't want them waterboarded, I want them dead. Removed entirely from the playing field. Now. Quickly.
Our Goofball-in-Chief is highly illogical. We've all seen the result of his "containment" policy live and in color in our living rooms for the past week.
At least the French didn't dally like our Fool-in-Chief.
700 billion dollars a year. How hard can it be? What would it take, a dozen bunker busters? Two dozen? How hard could it be to deprive those idiots of their revenue-generating oil fields, all of which are geographically localized and exposed to both land and air?
WHY haven't we decapitated those *ssholes yet?
Why?
