- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 18,233
- Reaction score
- 15,861
- Location
- veni, vidi, volo - now back in NC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Bump...
Bump you back... What part of "I understood the context" did you not understand?
Bump...
I understand that you made the claim that the NYT has never supported Bush or his admin, I am arguing it did through Miller/Raines, and your responses consist of referring to talk show hosts/authors/reporters who never worked for the NYT. And here you are still diverting from THAT context, YOUR context.Bump you back... What part of "I understood the context" did you not understand?
I understand that you made the claim that the NYT has never supported Bush or his admin, I am arguing it did through Miller/Raines, and your responses consist of referring to talk show hosts/authors/reporters who never worked for the NYT. And here you are still diverting from THAT context, YOUR context.
The debate we were having had nothing to do with "my" context, it remains that the NYT did in fact support the Bush admin in the lead-up to the Iraq fiasco, directly countering the idea you hold that it did not.Again, and I hope it sticks this time - I understood the context. Your context. I got it. I still get it. That doesn't require me to address it, or to address your statements. I am neither confirming nor denying the validity of your statements (or their context), I am just not addressing them at all. But again, yes... I understand the context.