• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fox News Panel Stares At Women In Leggings

T

TheDemSocialist

Gradualist
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
34,951
Reaction score
16,311
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Socialist
In an attempt to shame women who wear leggings in public, Fox News paraded women in leggings and had a panel of men judge them. This is not made up. It actually happens.
Click to expand...


Video @: Fox News Panel Stares At Women In Leggings

What in the ****? How in the hell did they think this was a good idea? :shock::doh
 
No, I won't watch the video. I don't want to see it. Why did they do this? What was their problem with these ladies?
 
Alyssa T. said:
No, I won't watch the video. I don't want to see it. Why did they do this? What was their problem with these ladies?
Click to expand...

Not only is it ****ed up but incredibly awkward.
 
It is an excuse for their viewers to ogle at hot women. It is like when Fox News airs pieces criticizing the sexual nature of Spring Break while at the same time showing clips of bikini clad women shaking their butts throughout the entire piece. Sex sells. Even on Fox News.
 
TheDemSocialist said:
Video @: [/FONT][/COLOR]Fox News Panel Stares At Women In Leggings

What in the ****? How in the hell did they think this was a good idea? :shock::doh
Click to expand...

No surprise:

Those states that do consume the most porn tend to be more conservative and religious than states with lower levels of consumption, the study finds.

"Some of the people who are most outraged turn out to be consumers of the very things they claimed to be outraged by," Edelman says.
 
Glen Contrarian said:
No surprise:

Those states that do consume the most porn tend to be more conservative and religious than states with lower levels of consumption, the study finds.

"Some of the people who are most outraged turn out to be consumers of the very things they claimed to be outraged by," Edelman says.
Click to expand...

I work hard to keep the porn consumption rate in Georgia high.
 
I love porn! You gotta admit Fox does have hot women. But Young Turks? Nah, way too boring. And they're kinda gross and funky and yucky, too. I'd puke if I met these people in real life.
 
Glen Contrarian said:
No surprise:

Those states that do consume the most porn tend to be more conservative and religious than states with lower levels of consumption, the study finds.

"Some of the people who are most outraged turn out to be consumers of the very things they claimed to be outraged by," Edelman says.
Click to expand...

Yep, also shocking, but also not surprising. Sick.
 
much ado about nothing. must be a slow day for the Fox haters
 
Looked like a 'Monty Python' skit.
Bizarre.
 
TurtleDude said:
much ado about nothing. must be a slow day for the Fox haters
Click to expand...

Is that referring to the Fox 'panel show' or the Young Turks reaction? They're worth about a nickel each.
 
Alyssa T. said:
No, I won't watch the video. I don't want to see it. Why did they do this? What was their problem with these ladies?
Click to expand...

They didn't "do this". There was zero shaming occurring, though there was probably a bit of ogling from the TV audience. There was one discussion about whether or not gym wear is appropriate wear at the mall.

It was stupid morning news.
 
TurtleDude said:
much ado about nothing. must be a slow day for the Fox haters
Click to expand...

The suggestion by the OP that men aren't allowed to judge fashion is much more sexist and disgusting than the content of the video
 
Grand Mal said:
Is that referring to the Fox 'panel show' or the Young Turks reaction? They're worth about a nickel each.
Click to expand...

agreed. the YT panel was far more moronic though

the three women didn't seem to be shamed.
 
Crovax said:
The suggestion by the OP that men aren't allowed to judge fashion is much more sexist and disgusting than the content of the video
Click to expand...

I don't get what the faux outrage is. now if one of the models was say 5-6 and 300 pounds.........
 
TurtleDude said:
agreed. the YT panel was far more moronic though

the three women didn't seem to be shamed.
Click to expand...

See I can agree with you on stuff. No they obviously weren't ashemed to do this. They were probably lower end assistants or something and were either told that they should go on, or actually PLANNED to go on the show. These things don't just happen. It's measured and hand-picked.
 
Why is that Duck Dynasty bozo sitting there?
 
TurtleDude said:
much ado about nothing. must be a slow day for the Fox haters
Click to expand...

Yeah I mean who attacks a morning show? Good morning america does this all time and not to mention late night local programming. The what's really happening over exaggerated segments...
 
Kobie said:
Why is that Duck Dynasty bozo sitting there?
Click to expand...

Why not? Minor celebs that will come on a show for free are the bread and butter of morning shows
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom