• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Politico suggests Trey Gowdy responsible for State Department screw-up[W:26]

Mr Person said:
Well, the problem is, you have to actually read my post to see what the honest opinion is. I've put it in two posts now, and I don't know how to do text-to-speech by remote.



Is it really this common on this debate board for people who disagree with you to not debate, and instead put their fingers in their ears going "nyah nyah nyah can't hear you!" ?
Click to expand...

And again. you did not read the article. You wanted me to read the article for you and quote stuff. You are wasting my time.
 
NonoBadDog said:
And again. you did not read the article. You wanted me to read the article for you and quote stuff. You are wasting my time.
Click to expand...

You quoted from the Washington Examiner in the first post of this thread, which you started. Forgive me for assuming you read the article before posting about it.



That Examiner article lied about the Politico article, which I found out by reading your OP then reading the Politico article. I'm guessing this means that you simply assumed the Examiner was telling the truth because it was a conservative publication saying something negative about "the left", when you should have also read the Politico article that it was lying about.

If you're just going to parrot whatever a conservative publication says about its political foes without actually checking up on its claims, I rather think it's you who wasted our time.



(I also note, that you continue to refuse to read the Politico article you mischaracterized in the OP. Are you afraid of finding out that you were wrong?)
 
Mr Person said:
You quoted from the Washington Examiner in the first post of this thread, which you started. Forgive me for assuming you read the article before posting about it.



That Examiner article lied about the Politico article, which I found out by reading your OP then reading the Politico article. I'm guessing this means that you simply assumed the Examiner was telling the truth because it was a conservative publication saying something negative about "the left", when you should have also read the Politico article that it was lying about.

If you're just going to parrot whatever a conservative publication says about its political foes without actually checking up on its claims, I rather think it's you who wasted our time.



(I also note, that you continue to refuse to read the Politico article you mischaracterized in the OP. Are you afraid of finding out that you were wrong? Are you afraid of finding out that you were wrong?)
Click to expand...

And you still haven't read the WEX article and you still want me to read it for you and provide quotes so you don't have to read it. Then you charge that the article is lying without even reading it. I'm guessing this means that you simply assumed the Examiner was lying because it was a conservative publication saying something negative about "the right". I did read the Politoco article. You assumed again and were wrong.

(I also note, that you continue to refuse to read the WEX article. Are you afraid of finding out that you were wrong?)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom