• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillary

Re: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillar

Fire Wasserman-Schultz. She brings disgrace to national politics.
 
Re: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillar

I can see it. I mean, she's a Clinton, so she toes the party line. She's just a status quo Republocrat, and that's what the party structure likes the most.

I don't think the Daily Mail is the most credible of sources, but even if it's completely true, I don't see anything unethical about a political party promoting the candidate it beleives best represents its' values.

It's the ethics of those values that I question; not the promotion of those values
 
Re: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillar

It all remains in play. From the NYT:

". . . Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clinton’s email setup had in fact put any of the nation’s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.


Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server had been compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing.

The White House quickly backed off the president’s remarks and said Mr. Obama was not trying to influence the investigation. But his comments spread quickly, raising the ire of officials who saw an instance of the president trying to influence the outcome of a continuing investigation — and not for the first time. . . ."

Still nothing
 
Re: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillar

It all remains in play. From the NYT:

". . . Those statements angered F.B.I. agents who have been working for months to determine whether Ms. Clinton’s email setup had in fact put any of the nation’s secrets at risk, according to current and former law enforcement officials.


Investigators have not reached any conclusions about whether the information on the server had been compromised or whether to recommend charges, according to the law enforcement officials. But to investigators, it sounded as if Mr. Obama had already decided the answers to their questions and cleared anyone involved of wrongdoing.

The White House quickly backed off the president’s remarks and said Mr. Obama was not trying to influence the investigation. But his comments spread quickly, raising the ire of officials who saw an instance of the president trying to influence the outcome of a continuing investigation — and not for the first time. . . ."

Investigators have not reached any conclusions regarding me having assassinated Archduke Francis Ferdinand but that doesn't mean i'm guilty of the crime.

Therefore, i can only assume you mean to confirm that there are no charges. Thanks.
 
Re: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillar

Thank you Jack.

Investigators have not reached any conclusions regarding me having assassinated Archduke Francis Ferdinand but that doesn't mean i'm guilty of the crime.

Therefore, i can only assume you mean to confirm that there are no charges. Thanks.

We shall see.
 
Re: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillar

Then there is this:
Bloomberg Politics

Insurrection Erupts at the Democratic National Committee

took a while but look what happened to debbie wasserman schultz' (now former) DNC vice chair
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...endorse-bernie-sanders/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b

hell yes she resigned to endorse Bernie
feel the Bern, debbie wasserman schultz - you dumb ass bitch
love and kisses, justabubba



ps, this congresswoman might make a excellent vice president
 
Re: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillar

took a while but look what happened to debbie wasserman schultz' (now former) DNC vice chair
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...endorse-bernie-sanders/?tid=pm_politics_pop_b

hell yes she resigned to endorse Bernie
feel the Bern, debbie wasserman schultz - you dumb ass bitch
love and kisses, justabubba



ps, this congresswoman might make a excellent vice president

I like her. I wonder how Pelosi is going to react to this. Pelosi is known for retaliation.
 
Re: Democratic National Committeewoman says her party is 'clearing a path' for Hillar

Thank you Jack.

Bill Clinton was never charged or convicted for the rape of Juanita Broaderick (spelling), but I believe her testimony all those years ago. Nor was he ever charged or convicted with other crimes related to Mena, Arkansas and cocaine smuggling, but the testimony of 2 state troopers was pretty persuasive IMO.

Therefore, it is highly likely that Bill is one of those "unconvicted" felons. I would be my last dollar his wife is in the same category of felon.
 
Back
Top Bottom