• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wasserman Schultz BS Nazi attack on Rubio... Where is the MSM?

Grim17

Grim17

Battle Ready
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 29, 2009
Messages
34,478
Reaction score
17,282
Location
Southwestern U.S.
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
DNC chair [FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Debbie Wasserman-Schultz launches another one of her patented dishonest personal attacks this time on Marco Rubio. It was a bogus attack that basically accuses Rubio of being insensitive to Jews by having a fund raiser at the home of a Nazi sympathiser. It's pure garbage and Schultz of course knows this, but how come the story is nowhere to be found by the big3?

I did a google search and nowhere in the first 10 pages did I find anything from ABC, NBC or CBS about the attack by Wasserman-Schultz. I found the story on Fox and CNN, along with tons of political websites but nothing from the big 3. You can read about it yourself from The Huffington Post

Speaking of political websites, there are some liberal websites that were more than willing to perpetuate her lie:

[/FONT]bias_debbieAttack.jpg[FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]

[/FONT]
 
Schultz is a running hyperbole joke. The only reason she is relevant is because far left and left leaning media cover her. I think addressing her insanity is just playing into her insanity.
 
Her inability to explain a difference between Socialism and Liberalism should lose her some supporters.

Truth is, if the Left ever came out and said what they were really about, they'd never win another election.
 
Maybe so, but the alternative is to ignore her lies and BS attacks, and that simply isn't acceptable.
 
WCH said:
Her inability to explain a difference between Socialism and Liberalism should lose her some supporters.

Truth is, if the Left ever came out and said what they were really about, they'd never win another election.
Click to expand...

That has been true for many, many years.
 
Grim17 said:
DNC chair [FONT=Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif]Debbie Wasserman-Schultz launches another one of her patented dishonest personal attacks this time on Marco Rubio. It was a bogus attack that basically accuses Rubio of being insensitive to Jews by having a fund raiser at the home of a Nazi sympathiser. It's pure garbage and Schultz of course knows this, but how come the story is nowhere to be found by the big3?

I did a google search and nowhere in the first 10 pages did I find anything from ABC, NBC or CBS about the attack by Wasserman-Schultz. I found the story on Fox and CNN, along with tons of political websites but nothing from the big 3. You can read about it yourself from The Huffington Post

Speaking of political websites, there are some liberal websites that were more than willing to perpetuate her lie:

<delete images for brevity>
Click to expand...
She needs to go the way of Mr. Boehner ...
 
I forgot to mention that I saw nothing in my search from the NY Times, Washington Post or LA Times either.
 
Chomsky said:
She needs to go the way of Mr. Boehner ...
Click to expand...

That was true long ago, but instead of replacing her for all the lies a few years back, Obama rewarded her by reappointed her to another term as head of the DNC.

What does that tell you about the democratic party?
 
Grim17 said:
That was true long ago, but instead of replacing her for all the lies a few years back, Obama rewarded her by reappointed her to another term as head of the DNC.

What does that tell you about the democratic party?
Click to expand...
It speaks to politics & power structures, because she's not liked much by her party, either.

Source: Politico - 'Dems turn on Wasserman Schultz

I personally don't care for her in terms of demeanor & personality, nor in terms of efficacy.
 
WCH said:
Her inability to explain a difference between Socialism and Liberalism should lose her some supporters.
Click to expand...

...why? Most of her supporters would be the ones who would be least prone to see a difference to begin with.


DWS is as clear an argument in favor of institutionalization of the mentally unstable as anyone else I have ever seen on television, but that doesn't mean that the Democrat party hasn't shifted solid left lately.
 
Ockham said:
Schultz is a running hyperbole joke. The only reason she is relevant is because far left and left leaning media cover her. I think addressing her insanity is just playing into her insanity.
Click to expand...
Most certainly. Schultz ranks (literally) right up there saying stupid **** with Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson Lee and the like.
WCH said:
Her inability to explain a difference between Socialism and Liberalism should lose her some supporters.

Truth is, if the Left ever came out and said what they were really about, they'd never win another election.
Click to expand...
Yep, but there are oh so many that don't examine things any closer than Obama phone, free healthcare and continued welfare.
Grim17 said:
Maybe so, but the alternative is to ignore her lies and BS attacks, and that simply isn't acceptable.
Click to expand...
I'm with you. The more the stupid **** is pointed out, widely and loudly, the more political pressure mounts.
Grim17 said:
That has been true for many, many years.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately true.
Chomsky said:
She needs to go the way of Mr. Boehner ...
Click to expand...
Absolutely!
Grim17 said:
I forgot to mention that I saw nothing in my search from the NY Times, Washington Post or LA Times either.
Click to expand...
How is that surprising? Either Rubio's fund raiser is so legitimate that it isn't news, or it's embarrassment at Schultz's ridiculous hyperbole (not being news either?)
Grim17 said:
That was true long ago, but instead of replacing her for all the lies a few years back, Obama rewarded her by reappointed her to another term as head of the DNC.

What does that tell you about the democratic party?
Click to expand...
About all you need to know about both the Democratic party and the lame stream media.
cpwill said:
...why? Most of her supporters would be the ones who would be least prone to see a difference to begin with.


DWS is as clear an argument in favor of institutionalization of the mentally unstable as anyone else I have ever seen on television, but that doesn't mean that the Democrat party hasn't shifted solid left lately.
Click to expand...

Agreed on DWS.

Also agreed on the Dems shifting significantly left. Cracks me up when they try to say that it's not them and it's the right's veer to the right (but it most certainly isn't that). Talk about yet another leftist meme that needs to be retired, just like Boehner.
 
I did a google search for Debbie Washmymuff Schultz and it led me to this...

DoucheandTurd13.jpg
 
eohrnberger said:
Most certainly. Schultz ranks (literally) right up there saying stupid **** with Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson Lee and the like.

Yep, but there are oh so many that don't examine things any closer than Obama phone, free healthcare and continued welfare.

I'm with you. The more the stupid **** is pointed out, widely and loudly, the more political pressure mounts.

Unfortunately true.

Absolutely!

How is that surprising? Either Rubio's fund raiser is so legitimate that it isn't news, or it's embarrassment at Schultz's ridiculous hyperbole (not being news either?)

About all you need to know about both the Democratic party and the lame stream media.


Agreed on DWS.

Also agreed on the Dems shifting significantly left. Cracks me up when they try to say that it's not them and it's the right's veer to the right (but it most certainly isn't that). Talk about yet another leftist meme that needs to be retired, just like Boehner.
Click to expand...

Greetings, Erik. :2wave:

I don't blame Boehner for leaving in disgust. It can't be enjoyable to know that you are expected to herd cats for a living, day in and day out! If you recall, he and BHO had reached an agreement a while back, which lasted until Pelosi and Reid got into the act and upped the ante by demanding more and more - which made it a no-go. But let the Tea Party object to anything, and they are demonized and marginalized by the opposition as being un-American? Strange how that works, seeing bull**** on display!
 
Ockham said:
Schultz is a running hyperbole joke. The only reason she is relevant is because far left and left leaning media cover her. I think addressing her insanity is just playing into her insanity.
Click to expand...

Plus, you know, she's a woman and a - wait for it - Jew!
 
It is curious isn't it. Pre-teens and teens eventually mature. Then, strangely, some people get involved in politics and return to the same behavior they displayed as pre-teens and teens.
 
shrubnose said:
Did you check WorldNetDailyand the Washington Times?

They're into this kind of malarkey.

:lol:
Click to expand...

What "malarkey" is that?

The head of the democratic party, the chairperson of the Democratic National Committee launches a phony attack on a presidential candidate and insinuates he disrespected Jews and is associated with a Nazi sympathiser... Is this what you are calling "malarkey" and feel isn't news worthy?
 
cpwill said:
...why? Most of her supporters would be the ones who would be least prone to see a difference to begin with.


DWS is as clear an argument in favor of institutionalization of the mentally unstable as anyone else I have ever seen on television, but that doesn't mean that the Democrat party hasn't shifted solid left lately.
Click to expand...
Pretty funny you used the word Nazi since she is Jewish.
 
Carleen said:
cpwill said:
...why? Most of her supporters would be the ones who would be least prone to see a difference to begin with.

DWS is as clear an argument in favor of institutionalization of the mentally unstable as anyone else I have ever seen on television, but that doesn't mean that the Democrat party hasn't shifted solid left lately.
Click to expand...
Pretty funny you used the word Nazi since she is Jewish.
Click to expand...

strategies-for-incorporating-the-national-reading-panels-five-components-of-reading-into-the-classroom-44-728.jpg
 
he also has in his collection a statue of che guevara (read the cite below)
wonder what that dip****'s take on that would be
the guy acquires historically significant pieces. he is not a nazi sympathizer
wasserman shultz should be embarrassed ... almost as much as the DNC

History abounds inside Harlan Crow?s home | Dallas Morning News
 
Grim17 said:
What "malarkey" is that?

The head of the democratic party, the chairperson of the Democratic National Committee launches a phony attack on a presidential candidate and insinuates he disrespected Jews and is associated with a Nazi sympathiser... Is this what you are calling "malarkey" and feel isn't news worthy?
Click to expand...

She's a lying troll. And I pity the idiots who believe her.
 
polgara said:
Greetings, Erik. :2wave:

I don't blame Boehner for leaving in disgust.
Click to expand...

Greetings, Polgara. :2wave:

No idea if Boehner is leaving in disgust or ineffectiveness.

polgara said:
It can't be enjoyable to know that you are expected to herd cats for a living, day in and day out!
Click to expand...
Well, kinda comes with the job of speaker, doesn't it?
polgara said:
If you recall, he and BHO had reached an agreement a while back, which lasted until Pelosi and Reid got into the act and upped the ante by demanding more and more - which made it a no-go.
Click to expand...
Yup. Seems that Pelosi and Reid didn't really want a deal after all, and would much rather engage in their partisan BS blame the Republicans, which some here mindlessly reflect, as instructed.
polgara said:
But let the Tea Party object to anything, and they are demonized and marginalized by the opposition as being un-American? Strange how that works, seeing bull**** on display!
Click to expand...

Yup. But then, where is the Republican leadership here? Where is the hard won experience to effectively guide the energy of the newer members to where it's best applied? Nada. So maybe it's time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom