- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,480
- Reaction score
- 17,287
- Location
- Southwestern U.S.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Steven Colbert did his first show at Late Night last night and it was filled with more jokes about Donald Trump than you could count, but not one single joke about Hillary. Looks like CBS has got someone to follow the same path as Letterman did, but unfortunately for them, that path leads to the same place Letterman found himself in... In last place according to the following review from Mediaite:
p.s those were my words in the title, not from the preceding review.
.
Colbert’s Late Show Debut Disappoints with Average Guests, Partisan Monologue
by Joe Concha | 11:55 am, September 9th, 2015
excerpt
So you watched at home and waited for Colbert to show he really wasn’t the partisan character he was on Comedy Central. First show, big audience…a second chance to make a first impression that he’s willing to stick it to both sides to avoid an optic that helped define (and hurt) Letterman in the twilight of his tenure. But as predictable as a Jon Stewart cameo, Hillary was ignored…prompting this Tweet and others like it from radio talk-show host Laura Ingraham:
Glad Colbert has shown his political leanings early. Where are the Hillary email jokes, Stevie?
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) September 9, 2015
And therein lies the rub: Colbert’s entire television career has been as a political satirist. He knows nothing else, which is why it’s no surprise four more presidential candidates will be joining The Late Show in the coming days (Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul). Outside of Biden and a possible announcement, is a political late-night program the right course? Because outside of a very select few, most politicans are packaged, tedious, boring to the masses.
As for Colbert’s standing in the late night race, I’m sticking to my original bet from back in April of 2014(when it first announced he would replace Letterman) on where he’ll ultimately end up when everything settles in and the curiosity factor fades: Third place, just like his predecessor in the final years of his career. No magical analysis or detail really needed here: Kimmel and Fallon are simply more talented, more experienced (in playing themselves), possess more range, connect with younger viewers better and are decidedly more apolitical than the 51-year-old Colbert, who was signed by CBS more because of cost-effectiveness than anything else after Jon Stewart was deemed too expensive to sign.
p.s those were my words in the title, not from the preceding review.
.