- Joined
- Dec 30, 2012
- Messages
- 1,234
- Reaction score
- 164
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
I consider myself to be the worlds best unpaid critic of political media and far superior to any paid critic. Credibility in political media is at an all time low and the so-called 'critics' are just as much products of the exhausted and outdated old school political media machine as the obsolete pundits that they offer their little pearls of wisdom to - and every bit as worthless. The old ways have dies and the world is in desperate need of a new breed of political media star to shine a light on a new way for political propaganda. Thankfully a new star has emerged in the form of FNC's Greg Gutfeld.
I acknowledged Gutfelds political genius years ago after seeing his skill on top rating FNC program The Five and marked him as the next big thing in political media. I am from Australia and do not have access to Gutfelds FNC show Red Eye but seeing him on The Five was enough for me to see that Greg Gutfeld was different to the rest of the lame and fake old school political media class. I could see that Greg Gutfeld understood true reality unlike the rest of the phony robots of political media that exist in an alternate reality to the general population. Greg Gutfeld is so important because he can make the audience believe that his thoughts and emotions are real and because of that the political points that he makes always feel honest and real. FNC are right to believe in Gutfeld and I was really pleased to hear recently that they had given Gutfeld his own prime time show in the Sun 10pm timeslot.
The new show is called The Greg Gutfeld Show and I am certain that it will be a great success and a good vehicle for raising Gutfelds profile but I did not expect that the current crop of critics, with their outdated thinking, would be able to fully appreciate or understands Gutfelds genius. I was correct and most early reviews of Gutfelds new show have been negative but these people have outdated thinking and are worthless as a result so bad reviews from them is good news for FNC and Greg Gutfeld. These critics do not understand the public and they certainly do not understand Greg Gutfeld.
Gutfeld has said that viewers either liked his show or they didnt understand it. This is even more true as far as the critics are concerned. The reason Gutfeld stands out is because he is not phony, lame and fake like all other political media but most critics dont seem to understand this at all because all of their suggestions for improving The Greg Gutfeld Show are the same exhausted and obsolete old tricks from old school political media that has caused the media credibility crisis. According to the critics Gutfeld must have bigname celebrity guests and a lame studio audience. This is the exact opposite of what Greg Gutfeld needs to do and he knows this. He does not need advice from worthless and obsolete critics. Studio audiences are lame and they also bring a feeling of fakeness because most of us have been to a live shooting of something or other and we understand how manufactured the whole 'studio audience' nonsense actually is. It was smart to not bother with an audience and the only reason to have one would be to make fun of them and the idea like he has done. Perhaps the critics will be pleased now that Gutfeld does have a studio audience - to make fun of. Who are these people that would go to sit in an audience for a tv show being filmed in 2015? Studio audiences are ridiculous. Perhaps Gutfeld should have canned laughter? Sarcastic canned laughter isnt a bad idea. The sarcastic studio audience is genius but I dont expect that the critics will understand.
Another thing that the critics are worried about is the ratings with the so-called key 25-54 demo. Who the hell decided that 25-54 was a democraphic and that it was key anyway? These people are beyond stupid. The early ratings for The Greg Gutfeld Show are good considering the competition but the task that Gutfeld has for FNC is to win over the younger audience. FNC already does well with baby boomer age viewers so Greg Gutfelds job is not to appeal to baby boomers but to gen x, gen Y and the millennials. Obsessing over the so-called key 25-54 demo is a waste of time for critics. It is Gutfelds job to appeal to a 30 year old but it is Bill OReillys job to appeal to the 54 year olds. In my opinion the early ratings are good and should be considered better than could be expected. It will take time to build the show up and FNC would have understoof this all along so I do not expect them to pay any attention to the early criticism of Gutfelds show. Gutfeld knows what he is doing and he is going to need time to do it.
I acknowledged Gutfelds political genius years ago after seeing his skill on top rating FNC program The Five and marked him as the next big thing in political media. I am from Australia and do not have access to Gutfelds FNC show Red Eye but seeing him on The Five was enough for me to see that Greg Gutfeld was different to the rest of the lame and fake old school political media class. I could see that Greg Gutfeld understood true reality unlike the rest of the phony robots of political media that exist in an alternate reality to the general population. Greg Gutfeld is so important because he can make the audience believe that his thoughts and emotions are real and because of that the political points that he makes always feel honest and real. FNC are right to believe in Gutfeld and I was really pleased to hear recently that they had given Gutfeld his own prime time show in the Sun 10pm timeslot.
The new show is called The Greg Gutfeld Show and I am certain that it will be a great success and a good vehicle for raising Gutfelds profile but I did not expect that the current crop of critics, with their outdated thinking, would be able to fully appreciate or understands Gutfelds genius. I was correct and most early reviews of Gutfelds new show have been negative but these people have outdated thinking and are worthless as a result so bad reviews from them is good news for FNC and Greg Gutfeld. These critics do not understand the public and they certainly do not understand Greg Gutfeld.
Gutfeld has said that viewers either liked his show or they didnt understand it. This is even more true as far as the critics are concerned. The reason Gutfeld stands out is because he is not phony, lame and fake like all other political media but most critics dont seem to understand this at all because all of their suggestions for improving The Greg Gutfeld Show are the same exhausted and obsolete old tricks from old school political media that has caused the media credibility crisis. According to the critics Gutfeld must have bigname celebrity guests and a lame studio audience. This is the exact opposite of what Greg Gutfeld needs to do and he knows this. He does not need advice from worthless and obsolete critics. Studio audiences are lame and they also bring a feeling of fakeness because most of us have been to a live shooting of something or other and we understand how manufactured the whole 'studio audience' nonsense actually is. It was smart to not bother with an audience and the only reason to have one would be to make fun of them and the idea like he has done. Perhaps the critics will be pleased now that Gutfeld does have a studio audience - to make fun of. Who are these people that would go to sit in an audience for a tv show being filmed in 2015? Studio audiences are ridiculous. Perhaps Gutfeld should have canned laughter? Sarcastic canned laughter isnt a bad idea. The sarcastic studio audience is genius but I dont expect that the critics will understand.
Another thing that the critics are worried about is the ratings with the so-called key 25-54 demo. Who the hell decided that 25-54 was a democraphic and that it was key anyway? These people are beyond stupid. The early ratings for The Greg Gutfeld Show are good considering the competition but the task that Gutfeld has for FNC is to win over the younger audience. FNC already does well with baby boomer age viewers so Greg Gutfelds job is not to appeal to baby boomers but to gen x, gen Y and the millennials. Obsessing over the so-called key 25-54 demo is a waste of time for critics. It is Gutfelds job to appeal to a 30 year old but it is Bill OReillys job to appeal to the 54 year olds. In my opinion the early ratings are good and should be considered better than could be expected. It will take time to build the show up and FNC would have understoof this all along so I do not expect them to pay any attention to the early criticism of Gutfelds show. Gutfeld knows what he is doing and he is going to need time to do it.