• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Movie Review Thread.

Recently saw two movies today. The first Resident Evil Afterlife I am so sick and tired of the guy making movies. And the worse part? He is going to be making another judging from the ending of the movie. The second was a cult classic that I heard a lot about. Near Dark was quite possibly one of the best vampire films I have ever seen. And there has been many vampire films but this one has to be one of the best.

But for Resident Evil not all was bad, I saw a preview to a possibly good movie, check it out:
 
Lord of War (2005) - one of the best movies I've seen lately, from the times when Nicolas Cage was playing in good movies and not in the crap he does today.
It is about an arms dealer and the way he does to the top of his profession, while focusing on the influence the arms dealers have on people's lives, a lot of symbolism in the movie too.
Pretty much a must-see.

Sherlock Holmes (2009) - Not bad, not bad at all. Not a great movie that would leave you open mouthed in its end, but not a waste of time either.
The movie's about one of Holmes' cases chasing a villain, obviously, and Holmes is played by the great Robert Downey Jr. who does a terrific job.
 
Machete- I didn't care for the boo hoo poor illegals and opposition to illegal immigration are racist rhetoric. I still enjoyed the movie. I was funny, lots of blood, had some of my favorite actors and actresses and and kind of had the feel of a classic b movie.
 
I just returned from watching Never Let Me Go and man was that movie depressing. I loved the movie.

A.
 
Last two weeks ago i watched a movie Cango ......... Its a good movie thats about the life of Gorillas.
 
Just saw Låt den rätte komma in, a beautiful and critically acclaimed Swedish movie with subtitles, based on the novel of the same name.
It's about a boy who befriends a centuries-old little girl vampire (actually, it's a castrated male child-vampire, but you don't find that out until later).

The reason this film is showing on Netflix at the moment is because... *drumroll*.... they've made an American remake of it, which will be released in theaters Oct 3rd.
So far, the critical reviews have been outstanding; they say the remake is "perfection": better than the original, which was completely top-notch.

In the remake, the boy will be played by the little boy who starred in The Road, and the girl vampire will be played by Hit Girl from Kickass. :lol:

I'm not sure if the whole "castrated male" element will be part of the remake at all; from the reviews, it sounds like in the remake, the vampire is a girl, period, the end.
Which is fine, too. It won't really effect the storyline any, because the children are prepubescent anyway. I sort of wish they'd kept that element just to stay truer to the book, but it would be difficult for "Hit Girl" (actress Chloe Moretz) to pull that off; she's older than Lina Leandersson (the actress in the original), and clearly female. Lina Leandersson is much more androgynous.

Anyway, I'm definitely going to see this in the theater on opening night. I expect miracles from the remake, since the original was so awesome and the remake is supposed to be even better.


Just saw Let Me In (the remake).
I was very disappointed.
It wasn't terrible; it just wasn't magic, like the first one.
And what's really sad is that it probably cost a hundred times more to make, and it used stars for the lead roles, unlike the original, which was extremely low-budget and used unknown child actors.
But this one, somehow, didn't have the same creepy, knife-edge feel.
Part of it was ambiance: while both movies took place in 1983, the original took place in communist Stockholm, Sweden, in the dark icy dead of winter; the remake takes place in New Mexico, where it's snowing, but only a little bit. :roll:

The remake was bright and vividly colored; the original seems, in retrospect, to be filmed in black and white (although it wasn't; it just seems that way, in my memory. The colors were dull and dingy; the contrast was stark).

The dialogue, in the remake, seems stilted and silly, and the girl vampire seems far too old for the boy, like some sort of teenage pedophile babysitter.
It seemed much more natural in the original (although admittedly, it was in Swedish, so maybe that helped), and the children in the lead roles were beautifully matched.
The special effects in this remake- as expensive as they probably were- detracted from the movie. They seemed incongruous and stupid, and detracted from the movie's seriousness. They didn't use as many special effects in the original; the vampire seemed more like a pitiable child with a crippling disease that made her dangerous than like some superhuman demonic creature, as she is in the remake.
The remake also did this thing I hate: they kept shoving 80s memorabilia in viewers' faces in a distracting way (oh look! It's a shirt with an Izod alligator! oh look! it's a Ms pacman video game! And look here! A rotary telephone!!), which was completely unnecessary, since the movie opened with a line of text stating it was New Mexico, 1983. I'm pretty sure viewers aren't going to forget that information if they aren't beaten over the head with tassled loafers, Ronald Reagan broadcasts on black and white television sets (wtf is up with that, anyway? Who still had a black and white television in the early 80s?), and lame David Bowie music, and even if they do, who cares? It's not really relevant to the plot.
The original had a timeless feel, the era subtly established only by peripheral political events going on in the background.
In this remake, the gritty realism just wasn't there. And there was no chemistry between the actors, and you were glad for that, because it would've just been gross.

Anyway. Yeah, $19 bucks to see this crappy remake. :(
All it did was make me want to watch the original again, which I plan to do tomorrow, on Netflix.
 
Last edited:
Just as an illustration of what I'm talking about (because sometimes a picture's worth a thousand words) these are the stars of, respectively, the original, and the remake.
Maybe you can see what I mean about the difference, just from the pictures.

Original:



Uploaded with ImageShack.us


Remake:




Uploaded with ImageShack.us


:doh
 
Lost Boys 3: The Thirst. It seemed more of a sequel than Lost Boys 2: The Tribe and a lot better, it should have been the 2nd sequel instead of "The Tribe" But it still does not hold a candle to the original lost boys movie.
 
Hereafter:Movie sucked don't watch it.
 
The Woman in Black :thumbs:

The storyline was doubly-classic, very predictable - one runon sentence can sum it on. No newness at all.

Good acting, though.

However - the directing and editing. . . great job. This movie managed to actually scare me - at least three times (****ers) - I watch thrill flicks all the time, my collection is enormous - but this was the first time in a long time I was actually caught off gaurd and truly scared. I think one time I even screamed - my husband laughed his ass of at me.

And it wasn't because it was graphic or new concepts - no - it was all still traditional; the usual scare-concepts and ideas . . . typical of all such movies. It was the timing - a lot of things happened when it normally wouldn't happen. It was not syncronized and typical like most movies are. Very well done - all in the directing and editing on this one. They must have gone 'ok- normally you'd have it happen *now - let's wait 10 minutes and do it then . . . ' Right when you think they let go of the scare-moment and moved on - it would happen, or it would happen when it just normally doesn't - a traditional scene setup that's typically not creepy.

And it made me cry at the end - I don't know who's asshole idea it was to make that happen but that sucked.
 
Last edited:
The Woman in Black :thumbs:

The storyline was doubly-classic, very predictable - one runon sentence can sum it on. No newness at all.

Good acting, though.

However - the directing and editing. . . great job. This movie managed to actually scare me - at least three times (****ers) - I watch thrill flicks all the time, my collection is enormous - but this was the first time in a long time I was actually caught off gaurd and truly scared. I think one time I even screamed - my husband laughed his ass of at me.

And it wasn't because it was graphic or new concepts - no - it was all still traditional; the usual scare-concepts and ideas . . . typical of all such movies. It was the timing - a lot of things happened when it normally wouldn't happen. It was not syncronized and typical like most movies are. Very well done - all in the directing and editing on this one. They must have gone 'ok- normally you'd have it happen *now - let's wait 10 minutes and do it then . . . ' Right when you think they let go of the scare-moment and moved on - it would happen, or it would happen when it just normally doesn't - a traditional scene setup that's typically not creepy.

And it made me cry at the end - I don't know who's asshole idea it was to make that happen but that sucked.

I saw half this movie at the base free theater. I wasn't really impressed, but I still cried at the end too (I teared up anyway). I only watched it because I had several hours til my hubby got off work, I had just finished a drill weekend, and I wanted to see Chronicle, which was showing after. I did recommend it to my husband though. He loves these kind of movies.

A little off-topic, but is this raise-the-dead-thread day or something? This is the second thread that popped up in my panel that had a last post in 2010 before today.
 
I saw half this movie at the base free theater. I wasn't really impressed, but I still cried at the end too (I teared up anyway). I only watched it because I had several hours til my hubby got off work, I had just finished a drill weekend, and I wanted to see Chronicle, which was showing after. I did recommend it to my husband though. He loves these kind of movies.

A little off-topic, but is this raise-the-dead-thread day or something? This is the second thread that popped up in my panel that had a last post in 2010 before today.

Everyone gets caught by different things in movies - movies that get to me don't remotely get to my husband.

Raise the dead :D Instead of starting a new thread! It's a new trend - all the rage. LOL
 
Dark Shadows.

What can I say about Dark Shadows that hasn't already been said about Afghanistan.

I have seen very few movies lately, but my god, never in all my years have I had to sit through this ordeal of a movie.

My girlfriend is crazy about Johnny Depp and I thought hey, Johnny Depp as a vampire might be watchable, boy was I wrong.

The film was a complete mish mash of incomplete, poorly executed ideas and Tim Burton attempts to pulverise the audience into believing what they are seeing is funny, almost nudging you saying "You should laugh now".

I smirked probably once during this movie.

The real issue with Dark Shadows is that it's not sure what it's trying to be. It was presented to us in trailers as a sort of light hearted comedy against the backdrop of the dark magic that is vampires, but I can tell you there were scenes in this movie that were incredibly dark and in some cases a little disturbing.

The only saving grace to this movie was Eva Green being sexy as all hell, Johnny Depp with an acceptable performance and the rest of the ensemble who manage to scrape through kicking and screaming. I rarely ever fault actors as ultimately its the directors fault.

From what I've seen and read the man ultimately responsible for this heinous pile of frog feces is squarely placed at Tim Burtons feet.

Dark Shadows gets a 3/10 from me.
 
LOL - "what have we done!" (Mikey Knox)

I haven't heard of this 'Dark Shadows' - and after watching a trailer - Considering my love for Vampires, my quirky obcession with Gene Wilder, and my perverse sense of curiosity - I must sit through this abomination.

I realy do like how it's all come back around - the quirky dark humor and cheesy lines. it was gone for quite some time from the screen in favor of retarded horrors like Saw - and too many war movies. Can we not have some blood and sex served up every now and then without it making a political statement?
 
Last edited:
My wife and I went and saw Prometheus last night. It wasn't expecting an Oscar worth performance, but the trailers looked pretty decent, and it was rated pretty well on Rotten Tomatoes. Boy was I in for an unpleasant surprise.

The whole movie was an unrealistic, confusing mess. The 'scientific' survey mission couldn't have been less scientific if it tried. The plot just sort of bumbled along, there didn't seem to be any motivation for half the things the characters did, and most of their reactions to the situations they faced were laughably unrealistic. The main questions that the story raised were left unanswered at the end, probably because they were hoping they could make a sequel and answer them there. It also seemed like it was being billed as a suspenseful movie, like Alien was, but I found that absolutely nothing in the movie was the least bit scary, because everything that happened that might have been scary was so blatantly obvious that you saw it coming a mile away.

All in all, it was a pretty major disappointment, and I wouldn't recommend wasting the money to go see it.
 
Back
Top Bottom