• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Star Wars: Force Awakens Reviews [W:139]

BloodRedKane said:
Not that the Lord of the Rings films weren't great and well acted esp. the actor who played Aragorn - but in terms of literature Tolkien is inferior.

Although HP Lovecraft, Michael Moorcock, Robert E. Howard and Fritz Leiber are from the Weird Tales era of pulp fiction, their stories are far more dynamic, imaginative, stylistic but at same time darker, more gothic, inspired and are far more effective at creating and defining a mood for the Fantasy, Sci Fi genre. The overall tone of the Weird Tales era is much more psychological and horrific, much in the same way Poe was superior to the peers of his genre Shelley, HG Wells, Robert Bloch, Bradbury, Asimov or Bram Stoker.
Click to expand...

We will agree to disagree.
 
Is this movie worth seeing if I've only seen the original Star Wars through Return of the Jedi and nothing since?
 
JC Callender said:
Is this movie worth seeing if I've only seen the original Star Wars through Return of the Jedi and nothing since?
Click to expand...

It has a lot of call backs to the original trilogy, and very few to the prequel trilogy, so probably is worth a viewing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom