- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 50,241
- Reaction score
- 19,243
- Location
- San Antonio Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
UHG.
Look I know, it's a reboot and all, but seriously? Was that REALLY necessary?
-
This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
Star Trek Beyond trailer now out... uhg.
- Thread starter Renae
- Start date
UHG.
Look I know, it's a reboot and all, but seriously? Was that REALLY necessary?
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2013
- Messages
- 28,659
- Reaction score
- 18,803
- Location
- Charleston, South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Yeah... Blowing up the Enterprise seems a bit ballsy to say the least. But hey! At least they're not just remaking the same movie over again. That's progress... I suppose.
Wasn't Bryan Cranston supposed to be a Klingon in this, or something?
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 17,471
- Reaction score
- 4,063
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2007
- Messages
- 50,241
- Reaction score
- 19,243
- Location
- San Antonio Texas
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Let's see, in Star Trek II we had Khan, in this reboot, 2nd movie, Khan
In Star Trek III they blew the Enterprise up, and it was an emotional, heart wrenching sacrifice.
In this one they blow it up to lower the budget to play " 2 Trek 2 Furious "
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2010
- Messages
- 35,171
- Reaction score
- 44,122
- Location
- Somewhere in Babylon...
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Doesn't look good at all.
Riveroaks
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2015
- Messages
- 10,230
- Reaction score
- 2,081
- Location
- Peoples' Republic Of CALIF
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Looks pretty good to me. At least as far as ultra modern visual effects go. Maybe it even has a plot.
This beats the crap out of Star Wars.
What do you think the target market is ??
It has enough female actresses to at least appeal to some female viewers -- nerd girlies and all that -- the female trekies.
I think it is worth a look.
Riveroaks
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2015
- Messages
- 10,230
- Reaction score
- 2,081
- Location
- Peoples' Republic Of CALIF
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
It still beats the crap out of Star Wars.
Ben K.
DP Veteran
- Joined
- May 2, 2010
- Messages
- 4,717
- Reaction score
- 1,981
- Location
- Dublin, Ireland
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
They need to use McCoy. Out of all the rebooted characters, he's the most pitch perfect take on the original.
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2010
- Messages
- 35,171
- Reaction score
- 44,122
- Location
- Somewhere in Babylon...
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Even the worst Episode of Trek, with the worst Costumes and Set Design.
Has more creative force, more heart, more story and more characterization than all three Star Wars prequel movies.
This alleged Star Trek Movie in the OP is a corporate diarrhea fiasco.