Society's stupid labels on sexy women - Page 2

independent_thinker2002 · 12-23-05, 04:17 PM

If you've got it, flaunt it. But while women are flaunting it, don't be upset if it gets you unwanted attention.

alphieb · 12-23-05, 04:48 PM

Those that label attractive women as sluts...etc, would actually give their right arm to look like that. I wonder why people don't put this kind of emphasis on men? I once heard that a women actually looks at how attractive the women is while she is checking out a man and if she is pretty, he somehow looks more attractive to her.

libertarian_knight · 12-23-05, 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Comrade Brian

Now toughness/intelligence, can be gained easily, prettiness is natural.

I stopped there, if there is more to repsond to, i will with another post.

AHEM. You must not be pretty. Pretty is work! Eating right, excersizing, and grooming do a hell of a lot for prettiness. A fat slob won't be pretyy because they don't work at it.

Granted, there definately is a certain element of prettiness that come right from birth, not all of it though.

You think if Angelina Jolie put on 160 lbs, she would be pretty? OR look at Charlize Theron is Monster, she looked major ugly, and she's a normally beautiful women.

Furthermore, toughness and intelligence are work too, these are thing I know more. Ever met an intelligent man, that doesn't read? or a tough man, that doesn't know how to use thier bodies? Again, there are certain elements people start out with, all in all, generally pretty close.

The stupidest "normal" person, or most mentally challenged poeple (excluding invalids and people in comas) though somewhat "low" by our standards, are more intelligent than ANY OTHER ANIMAL AT PEAK.

===
enough with that. There is social pressure, because DARWIN WAS RIGHT.

Too often though labels are attached out of malice, envy or jealousy, you're right about that.

But labels are an expidient tool. It takes too long, to fully know everyone you'll ever interact with, especially if only for a moment. By the time you completely know 1 person, 1/2 of your life may be gone. So, because we're mortal and we die, we have to make use of labels, and some of them to exclude people who seem to behave in manners we don't approve (and yes, we are allowed to judge, in fact, we must).

Like the label: Dirty Evil Socialist Republican Party Statist Apologists, aka John W Bush Voters :p

Or Dirty Evil Socialist Democrat Party Statist Control Freaks, aka Geroge F Kerry voters.

Can never really tell the two apart though, just one looks more like a monkey.

libertarian_knight · 12-23-05, 05:18 PM

Oh, yes, I am apprecitive of all sluts, without VD, and close to "normal" wieght; and some sluts with VD or away from "normal" wieght on a case by case basis.

independent_thinker2002 · 12-23-05, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alphieb

I once heard that a women actually looks at how attractive the women is while she is checking out a man and if she is pretty, he somehow looks more attractive to her.

This is true. Most women don't want something until they see another woman with it. Whether it be shoes/clothing, partners (this explains why married men are more attractive to women, it's the ring), cars, lifestyles, or jobs.

goligoth · 12-23-05, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by galenrox

Not neccisarily, you're both right and wrong at the same time.
It's not strength per say, but power, which combines strength and intelligence. If you can just dominate others, especially whole groups of people, either by physical stature or mental power, or a combination of the two or by any other means, you are bound to be BATHING in pussy. So to say just because someone's strong they'll get it is not neccisarily true, because if that strong person is someone's bitch, then no they won't (or maybe they'll catch some leftovers).

That's why over time the smarter guys become the ones getting the chicks while the old high school football players who work at the local gas station are looking for any trashy broad who'll give them the time of day, because in high school, size typically equates to power, but out of high school that typically no longer applies, but instead it's who's got the better job, who's got more money, etc. and that's typically the smart guy, not the big guy.

Yeah i suppose your right. But those who control things from behind the curtain rarely get remembered after the play...so-to-speak...

Plus I'm still in freakin high school and it sucks a$$ in here.....I can pretty much get anything I want but stupid people are annoying and stupid people are everywhere in here.....

libertarian_knight · 12-24-05, 03:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by goligoth

Yeah i suppose your right. But those who control things from behind the curtain rarely get remembered after the play...so-to-speak...

Plus I'm still in freakin high school and it sucks a$$ in here.....I can pretty much get anything I want but stupid people are annoying and stupid people are everywhere in here.....

heh, wait till you get out of high-school and meet stupid people that don't have the benefit of youthful ignorance. Those people really suck: Stupid 4 Life.

vergiss · 12-24-05, 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by libertarian_knight

AHEM. You must not be pretty. Pretty is work! Eating right, excersizing, and grooming do a hell of a lot for prettiness.

*feels smug*

I avoid exercise at costs, eat junk food daily and rarely wear makeup because it plays havoc on my complexion - but I still remain roughly 100 lb and get regular jobs as part-time model. Mwahahaha.

Point is, if you're born unattractive, you can't change that. Look at Paris Hilton - wears 3 inches of foundation but no clothes and probably hasn't eaten for a year, but still looks like she's had a head-on collision with a freight train.

tecoyah · 12-24-05, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vergiss

Point is, if you're born unattractive, you can't change that. Look at Paris Hilton - wears 3 inches of foundation but no clothes and probably hasn't eaten for a year, but still looks like she's had a head-on collision with a freight train.

So true....heh, By the way....whatcha doin' after Class?

From my perspective beauty no longer is found in firm breasts and a nice ass (though these are wonderful things to play with), rather a combination of the many things that make a woman, vs. a girl. I have found over the last decades that many who dress to impress are simply not worth my time, but were before because all I really wanted was sex, and they were more than willing to comply. At my age (almost 40) having gone thru the "learning what sex is" stage....and in the Masters degree program, experience and conversation are far more important than the so called "Slut Appeal". That said, I can still appreciate the effort put into the show....even if I no longer want to pay for the tickets.

Tashah · 12-24-05, 08:07 AM

Ironically, feminine beauty and intelligence are as intimidating... as they are irresistible.