Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister; http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html Interesting article. reminds me about author Jack London in 1905 ´...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-05, 02:31 AM   #1 (permalink)
DD7
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Last Online: 04-17-06 01:42 PM
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html

Interesting article. reminds me about author Jack London in 1905 ´when a Japanese officer told him about future plans to attack america and nobody believed him.
DD7 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 11-05-05, 09:22 AM   #2 (permalink)
Go ahead - make my day

 
M14 Shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: 06-28-07 02:38 PM
Location: Toledo-ish OH
Posts: 2,665
Thanks: 2
Thanked 70 Times in 50 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Aggressive
Re: World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

Quote:
Originally Posted by DD7
http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html
Interesting article. reminds me about author Jack London in 1905 ´when a Japanese officer told him about future plans to attack america and nobody believed him.
There are just SO many reasons wy China is not a military threat to the US, and why war with the US would be the worst thing they could ever do.
__________________
Any time someone says there should be a prior restraint on gun ownership, ask them what they think about a person's right to talk to known al Qaeda operatives without fear of being listened in on.
M14 Shooter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-05-05, 09:57 AM   #3 (permalink)
Educator

 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Today 12:23 PM
Posts: 1,240
Thanks: 28
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Chatty
Re: World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

Its just smack talk.



Its like the USSR did to us.
128shot is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-05-05, 10:53 AM   #4 (permalink)
Libertarian socialist

 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Last Online: Today 11:03 AM
Location: Dorset, england
Posts: 1,816
Thanks: 191
Thanked 128 Times in 100 Posts
Lean: Very Liberal
Gender: Male
Send a message via MSN to Red_Dave

Current Mood:
Bookworm
Re: World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

Quote:
Originally Posted by DD7
http://www.theepochtimes.com/news/5-8-8/31055.html

Interesting article. reminds me about author Jack London in 1905 ´when a Japanese officer told him about future plans to attack america and nobody believed him.
with respect the whole concept off a war between america and china is very silly. Cheap goods from china does alot for the american economy and vise versa. America isnt likely to bite the hand that feeds it and vise versa
Red_Dave is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-05-05, 02:19 PM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
SKILMATIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Online: 04-03-06 10:01 PM
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,423
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Send a message via AIM to SKILMATIC

Re: World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

All a war with China would do is end up losing a quarter of the earths population. America would just shrug. And WW3 wouldnt be cause because a mantal disorder from China has said some spiteful things about us. Half the world are idiots anyway for they have no idea how owerful this nation is. I pitty the individual who doesnt know about the US and how powerful it is.

I am a war science student and I can tell you with pure confidence as long as the mental disorders dont come to power then this country will remain strong.
SKILMATIC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-05-05, 02:28 PM   #6 (permalink)
Professor

 
Join Date: May 2005
Last Online: 08-07-08 01:41 PM
Location: Plano, Texas :: New York City
Posts: 1,534
Thanks: 10
Thanked 22 Times in 21 Posts
Lean: Slightly Liberal
Gender: Male

Re: World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

Quote:
Originally Posted by SKILMATIC
All a war with China would do is end up losing a quarter of the earths population. America would just shrug. And WW3 wouldnt be cause because a mantal disorder from China has said some spiteful things about us. Half the world are idiots anyway for they have no idea how owerful this nation is. I pitty the individual who doesnt know about the US and how powerful it is.

I am a war science student and I can tell you with pure confidence as long as the mental disorders dont come to power then this country will remain strong.
you're basing this only on the fact that we have nukes right? In conventional warfare, both sides would loose a ****load.
nkgupta80 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-05-05, 10:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
SKILMATIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Online: 04-03-06 10:01 PM
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,423
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Send a message via AIM to SKILMATIC

Re: World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

Quote:
Originally Posted by nkgupta80
you're basing this only on the fact that we have nukes right? In conventional warfare, both sides would loose a ****load.
Are you fvcking kidding me? The only country that would reek havoc on us in conventional warfare would be GB and even that country would have a very hard time because we would obtain air superiority very quickly. Then its only a matter of time before victory is obtained. Now on a land basis the strongest country is china but we wouldnt be stupid to put troops on the ground till we bomb the smitherines out of them(not necassarily with nukes). We do have MOAB's too.

So to answer your question nukes dont even have to be in the picture. We would still decimate any country that feels they need a spanking. And loses would be minimal.
SKILMATIC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-05-05, 10:26 PM   #8 (permalink)
Go ahead - make my day

 
M14 Shooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Online: 06-28-07 02:38 PM
Location: Toledo-ish OH
Posts: 2,665
Thanks: 2
Thanked 70 Times in 50 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Aggressive
Re: World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

Quote:
Originally Posted by nkgupta80
you're basing this only on the fact that we have nukes right? In conventional warfare, both sides would loose a ****load.
I have several thousand reasons why that's not so, and each is 5280 feet long and very wet-- China has no way to project conventional military force against the United States.

The reverse is not true - we have the ability to pick apart their mainland defenses and literally rain fire down on their economy - not to mention blockade all their ports and eliminate their ability to export/import goods. Thus ends the war.

Would we lose people? Sure. But the issue is never in doubt.
M14 Shooter is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-05-05, 11:02 PM   #9 (permalink)
Banned
 
SKILMATIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Online: 04-03-06 10:01 PM
Location: San Diego
Posts: 3,423
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Send a message via AIM to SKILMATIC

Re: World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

Quote:
Originally Posted by M14 Shooter
I have several thousand reasons why that's not so, and each is 5280 feet long and very wet-- China has no way to project conventional military force against the United States.

The reverse is not true - we have the ability to pick apart their mainland defenses and literally rain fire down on their economy - not to mention blockade all their ports and eliminate their ability to export/import goods. Thus ends the war.

Would we lose people? Sure. But the issue is never in doubt.
The operation you speak of is seige. You put an area under seige and that area will insurmountably break down. This is what we do to every opponent we go to war with. While under seige they are getting bombarded by a plethera of ordinance and this will also break their will. All while we are closing in.
SKILMATIC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 11-06-05, 10:42 AM   #10 (permalink)
Professor

 
Comrade Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Last Online: 05-20-06 03:39 AM
Location: NE, Minnesota
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gender: Male

Re: World War III is near, long speech by Chinese Defense minister

Quote:
Originally Posted by SKILMATIC
So to answer your question nukes dont even have to be in the picture. We would still decimate any country that feels they need a spanking. And loses would be minimal.
Not really so. Russia has the most tanks by far. And the largest submarine fleet, and still considerable air power. And a large overall military. They also have a lot of nukes.

China is gaining military power fast, have the largest infantry. But still considerable in other areas. And has some nukes.

And any other country would no doubt draw attention and make the US even more hated.
Comrade Brian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Minister Farrakhan first letter to Bush The Liberal Puke Archives 4 11-15-05 10:30 AM
war on terror or new world order biblemark1018 Archives 75 10-11-05 06:05 PM
Hate rfanuka Archives 1 10-04-05 05:57 AM
Operation I AM on the World antollma Archives 0 09-16-05 02:21 AM
China arrests Singapore journalist ludahai Archives 42 08-12-05 08:12 PM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Captain America
· · ·
Member Galleries
946 photos
183 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:56 PM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO