• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Support the anti-gay boycotts

Unless the arguement was for homosexuality to be legal or illegal in public, nothing is being forced on anyone.





Easy to say when you are safe and secure with your marrital status readily available. But I suppose black people were crying like a bunch of spoiled brats too right? Women were originally crying like a bunch of spoiled brats? How about what we now call Americans? Were they originally crying like spoiled brats? Our Country was founded by all of these "crying spoiled brats" as you put it. The only difference between now and then is time.

That kind of attitude displayed is what slows down the process. Shame!

That's just wrong!!

Twisting what I said to mean what you wanted is juvenile.

Comparing the horrors of slavery to marital status for homosexual couples is despicable and you should be ashamed.

Look closely and you will see the point was discussing that change is inevitable, and that everything changes weather we like it or not, or weather for good or for bad.

You can not force change within society, change happens at it's own time schedule not ours alone. We can have an effect, but little more.

I am sure you can figure that the "brat" comment was in reference to not getting the change that was expected. Sure things changed but the largest change seems to be that the majority got their butts out to vote, and that is what happened this time.

Go back and re read my posts carefully, and let me know if you still think wrongly attempting making me look like some kind of monster was proper!

Lastly remember we can not always get what we desire, and most anything worth having is worth fighting for, and that goes both ways.
 
I can appreciate the sentiment here, although I disagree with everything else. if you believe that the issue of gay marriage is equal to struggles of black people, women, and bullied colonists, then you should be indignant, and if you are otherwise then shame on you.

the reason I'm not indignant is because I don't think the issues are parallel. gays don't have less rights than other americans and aren't enslaved, mistreated or even generally disrespected--at least, not where I come from. they are a very small minority which in my opinion is demanding widespread verbal affirmation from a group of people that is reluctant to involve themselves in a lifestyle they consider unsavory, as well as asking special privileges from the government based solely on their sexual orientation. why should government reward people for being gay? that is like demanding benefits for being african american or mexican or french.

Well said!!
 
That's just wrong!!

Twisting what I said to mean what you wanted is juvenile.

Comparing the horrors of slavery to marital status for homosexual couples is despicable and you should be ashamed.

Look closely and you will see the point was discussing that change is inevitable, and that everything changes weather we like it or not, or weather for good or for bad.

You can not force change within society, change happens at it's own time schedule not ours alone. We can have an effect, but little more.

I am sure you can figure that the "brat" comment was in reference to not getting the change that was expected. Sure things changed but the largest change seems to be that the majority got their butts out to vote, and that is what happened this time.

Go back and re read my posts carefully, and let me know if you still think wrongly attempting making me look like some kind of monster was proper!

Lastly remember we can not always get what we desire, and most anything worth having is worth fighting for, and that goes both ways.

I fail to see what was twisted? Unless of course you are meaning to say that you did not actually mean the what COULD be considered hateful comments and were making light of the situation? In that case I would retract what I said about YOU personally based on that given statement. But then again, this is the internet. Maybe a tag or emoticon on the intended joke would help your case alot more.

What makes you think oppression in any form is okay? Is it not "despicable" to deny a gay family the same benefits as a straight family? Is it not "despicable" to judge a family based on the parents sexual orientation? I don't see it as any different than judging someone based on their skin color, religious preference, or gender.

You can not force change? Well I suppose people should just go with the flow and see what happens then? No. I believe that is wrong. Nobody should be forced to watch from the sidelines and hope that people will play fair eventually.

That "brat" comment about not getting the change that was expected... hmmmmmmm. I hope you see why I find that comment ridiculous. In case you don't, how would you feel if your marriage was discredited because of ANY difference you've got from the "majority"? I would bet just about anything that you would be pretty pissed.

I wouldnt paint you as some kind of monster, I will however vehemently disagree with your point of view. That would be the point of debate.

Lastly, it goes both ways for sure. I fail to see the relevance though. Are you saying that because each side fought for what it believes in that neither side should feel wronged? Please explain.

You've always got an opportunity to further explain your position when you feel that someone did not comprehend what you were trying to put forth.
 
I can appreciate the sentiment here, although I disagree with everything else. if you believe that the issue of gay marriage is equal to struggles of black people, women, and bullied colonists, then you should be indignant, and if you are otherwise then shame on you.

why should government reward people for being gay? that is like demanding benefits for being african american or mexican or french.

Would you take my posts as anything other than indignant? I should hope not.

You ask why should the government reward people for being gay? Why should the government reward people for being straight? Why should the government reward people for ANYTHING that comes down to personal choice? I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Unless you want to deny the marrital benefits of a straight couple who is sterile or who chooses to not personally birth children, but to adopt or not have them at all, I do not feel that your "societal benefit" arguement holds ANY ground.

A Gay Family is STILL a family.
 
That's just wrong!!

Twisting what I said to mean what you wanted is juvenile.

Comparing the horrors of slavery to marital status for homosexual couples is despicable and you should be ashamed.

Talk about twisting a post!!! I don't think he was comparing the actual events as much as he was comparing the motivations and defenses behind them.
 
Would you take my posts as anything other than indignant? I should hope not.

nope, you've been pretty indignant.

Why should the government reward people for being straight?

straight people make babies.

Why should the government reward people for ANYTHING that comes down to personal choice?

because some things that people choose can benefit the government (and other people) in the long run.

Unless you want to deny the marrital benefits of a straight couple who is sterile or who chooses to not personally birth children, but to adopt or not have them at all, I do not feel that your "societal benefit" arguement holds ANY ground.

but we've been through this, haven't we? yes we have.
 
nope, you've been pretty indignant.



straight people make babies.



because some things that people choose can benefit the government (and other people) in the long run.



but we've been through this, haven't we? yes we have.

We have been through this. And your view on sterile couples and couples who refuse to CREATE children as opposed to homosexual couples who adopt or do not are inconsistent.

As far as "in the long run". Having enough families that want to adopt children rather than leave them to foster care is beneficial as well.

Deny that homosexual families are equal to heterosexual families when it comes to raising children.
 
Last edited:
I fail to see what was twisted? Unless of course you are meaning to say that you did not actually mean the what COULD be considered hateful comments and were making light of the situation? In that case I would retract what I said about YOU personally based on that given statement. But then again, this is the internet. Maybe a tag or emoticon on the intended joke would help your case alot more.

What makes you think oppression in any form is okay? Is it not "despicable" to deny a gay family the same benefits as a straight family? Is it not "despicable" to judge a family based on the parents sexual orientation? I don't see it as any different than judging someone based on their skin color, religious preference, or gender.

You can not force change? Well I suppose people should just go with the flow and see what happens then? No. I believe that is wrong. Nobody should be forced to watch from the sidelines and hope that people will play fair eventually.

That "brat" comment about not getting the change that was expected... hmmmmmmm. I hope you see why I find that comment ridiculous. In case you don't, how would you feel if your marriage was discredited because of ANY difference you've got from the "majority"? I would bet just about anything that you would be pretty pissed.

I wouldnt paint you as some kind of monster, I will however vehemently disagree with your point of view. That would be the point of debate.

Lastly, it goes both ways for sure. I fail to see the relevance though. Are you saying that because each side fought for what it believes in that neither side should feel wronged? Please explain.

You've always got an opportunity to further explain your position when you feel that someone did not comprehend what you were trying to put forth.

You may be totally missing my point, and if that is any fault of mine then accept my apologies etc. ,but if your debating or condemning my comparison of losing a battle over the "title" of marriage (not the benefits, but the name etc) and all the whining and noise we have seen since to that of a "brat" who did not get his way and took his bat and ball and went home well that's another story altogether.

What makes you think oppression in any form is okay? Is it not "despicable" to deny a gay family the same benefits as a straight family? Is it not "despicable" to judge a family based on the parents sexual orientation? I don't see it as any different than judging someone based on their skin color, religious preference, or gender.

I quoted this separate because I think this is an example of some of the confusion on this subject.

Remember like so many have stated previous that there is a large difference between the oppression and racism seen in the past that was due to someones race, color, national origin etc and that what still remains in reference to homosexuals today.

You just can not compare these as there are way more differences than similarities.

While you do choose religion (or not) you certainly do not choose your parents, skin color, race, or where you are born. Still even though there is much debate on what drives or causes and even when a persons sexual orientation is decided etc this issue of sexual preference knows no racial or nationality boundaries as it is something totally different.

There are people out there (some professionals) who believe pedophilia is a condition people are be born with, and like it or not there are people out there who will compare homosexuality with this. While I do not share these views I do understand that some have made a very similar argument as you have here. Though I am sure most intelligent people will rationalize the difference etc there are still people sitting in special prisons right now as I type this who feel they are being incarcerated unfairly etc. due to something they are born with that the public does not agree with. (I have a good friend who was a CO in one of these facilities and those beliefs were not uncommon)



You can not force change? Well I suppose people should just go with the flow and see what happens then? No. I believe that is wrong. Nobody should be forced to watch from the sidelines and hope that people will play fair eventually.

We can look at all kinds of ways to defend our thoughts on either side of this (I sometimes even do this in my mind as I am not for or against everything being debated on this subject) but the conclusions each of us realize do not in any way effect the fact that not every American is ready for this change (hence my explanation of timing and change).

I did not say anyone should be stifled or not enjoy their freedom of speech, but rather that trying to force something upon others who are not in favor of it should not have been expected to happen easily, and that similar efforts at a different time would produce different results.

And yes you really can not force change. Sure you can affect it etc but your not going to force it. I have known people who have a problem using a different route to get to work when there is construction etc, and even a little change like that stressed them out.

If you can not understand the issue of timing, and how society is ever changing and relate it to this then your not being completely honest with yourself.

Lastly, it goes both ways for sure. I fail to see the relevance though. Are you saying that because each side fought for what it believes in that neither side should feel wronged? Please explain.

You've always got an opportunity to further explain your position when you feel that someone did not comprehend what you were trying to put forth.

Wish I had time to fully convey all my thoughts, but try to do the best I can with the time available.

I thought the comment was pretty obvious, but anything worth having IS worth fighting for, but you have to be able to accept that you do not win every battle, and the bigger things tend to require a larger and longer effort.

Big changes do not happen over night, and I know the whole idea of acceptance and full equality have not been easy for any group and all you need to do is look at how long it took others etc.



I may be guilty of one thing though, and that is seeing the positive. If you consider how things have improved for most any minority group compared to 50, 100, or more years ago it is obvious that things have changed considerably, and the change in our country has been to the positive.
 
But it certainly prevents them from HAVING children. Which is what life and our society is all about. Propogation. I find it ludicrous for two gay men/women to try to raise a little baby girl or boy. Kids need a mommy AND a daddy. You ****ing queers are a degradation of our American society. Go back in your closets.

Wow. Just wow. Do you even know any gay people? If you did, you would not be saying what you just did.

Right. So life is all about having children, is it? Well, I guess the government better pass a law requiring everyone who is capable to have children. If not, then they should be charged for failure to add to the human population.

Kids need a mummy and a daddy? Okay, I'll let the social workers know that they have to start removing children from single parent homes. We should also do away with foster carers, I mean, it's not like those people are mummies and daddies, is it? Sperm donors we can get rid of, too, and probably adoption...because those kids have a real mummy out there somewhere and they can't live with them. How sad is that?:(

There are so many things wrong with that post that I can't really say anything more without hurling insults.
 
Exactly....Michael Jackson, Brittany Spears, etc can marry for a wide variety of reasons, but somehow allowing two gay people who love each other to marry will destroy the sacred integrity of "marriage" :doh

Of course! Britney can get drunk and wake up with a new husband and think 'oh ****' and get an anulment 52 hours later, but that's perfectly okay because she married a man!
Elizabeth Taylor can't decide which man she wants to marry, so she marries and divorces 8 times, but that's perfectly okay because she only married men!
Nicky Hilton can marry some unknown dude no one has ever heard of and divorce him 3 months later, but that's perfectly okay because he's a man! Drew Barrymore can marry some drunk in a pub and get an anulment 19 days later, but that's perfectly okay because he was a man!
Pamela Anderson can marry some dickward pornstar wannabe and divorce him after 3 months, and that's perfectly okay, because he had a penis!

A homosexual couple who have been in love and committed to each other for many years cannot get married! Why? Because they will desecrate the sanctity of marriage!!!

The anti gay marriage crowd really need to get their priorities straight!
 
Back
Top Bottom