Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives



View Poll Results: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout?
Just push it through quickly. We need it. 13 6.05%
More money to help the Middle Class / Accountability / Regulation. 21 9.77%
Create a committee / Accountability 12 5.58%
Do it but give them less. 4 1.86%
I Oppose Bailouts Period. They took the risk, let them go under. 160 74.42%
I have no idea what to think. I will just blindly back my candidate. 5 2.33%
Voters: 215. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-24-08, 12:53 PM   #41
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Last Seen: 02-04-09 12:16 PM
Posts: 2,231
Thanks: 47
Thanked 129 Times in 104 Posts
Cool Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John1234 View Post
Now that this has been in Congress a few days and I have heard different opinions, I am very much undecided on how I feel about it.
Neither McCain or Obama seems very firm on it.
McCain threw out some ideas first.
But Obama seems to have more details to offer so far.

I am curious as to how you will react to various options, now that we know of several different views.

I obviously believe the Senate should charge another 700 Billion Dollar Bailout on their credit cards and not tell the House of Representatives about it.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/archiv...tml#post119128 (Democratic Platform STRONG, HEALTHY FAMILIES)

Let's not discuss the fundamentals of putting the onus on the usurer with the college degrees and the super computers for managing the debt. Let's put the burden only on the poor and the middle class; buyer beware of what you do not know you bought.

*****

A lad puts down money to buy land, and gets a payment he can afford, and the country bank makes a good investment. A New York bank with a super computer, and more university degrees than the small town, gives two credit cards to the household to go with more maxed out debt, and the household's monthly payments exceed the ability to maintain the good investment. The law does not care. And I know personally that the Bush family does not care if any laws are violated by the banks. If these candidates only address the so-called "mortgage crisis," this is all I have to say:

I would really like to see usurer's heads popping like grapes on the sidewalk...I would really love to see the fall colors.
DivineComedy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-24-08, 04:46 PM   #42
Professor

 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Last Seen: 11-07-08 12:13 PM
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 1,788
Thanks: 306
Thanked 394 Times in 288 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesrage View Post
Which is why these companies should not get bail outs from the tax payers.
I finally made my decision and voted against the bailout.
I am surprised at how many are against it.
Especially with both candidates being for it.

Ron Paul is completely against it.
I like that man more and more each time i hear about him.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesrage View Post
I was under the assumption that the rich got rich because they worked very hard to get rich,not demand money from tax payers
If this was sarcasim then nm.
Do you know any rich people that worked hard to get rich?
I know a couple. And I know a couple hundred that didn't.
Most make more due to job title which is determined more by education than hard work.

Generally from job code to job code, the less they make the harder their job is.
A manager's job is harder work than his employees in most cases.
But the district and division manager's jobs are extremely easy when only dealing with profesional managers of which you own their life and souls.

One of the most difficult and tolling jobs on the body is a roofer.
Compare the pay of a roofer to that of an accountant or lawyer.
Seems to go this way even when sticking only to construction.
One of the highest paying trades as well as easiest is the ceramic tile guy.
But then there is also the electrician, AC, and Pumbers that is even easier and pays even more.
The general contractor just comes and checks the job for an hour each day.
He makes the most and does the least.
The roofers and framers have the hardest job. And they make less than the painters and trim carpenters.

Aside from all of that though, the majority of money in America is made with paper.
Deeds, Investments, stocks, etc.
Completely effortless when compared to actual work.
A lot of money is also simply old money.
And there is also hollywood money.
__________________
"We are all Georgians". No Mr. McCain, We are all Americans.
John1234 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-24-08, 05:53 PM   #43
Capitalist Fat-Cat

 
Ethereal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday 10:21 PM
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,189
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 4,165 Times in 2,347 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

US Marines:   
Total Awards: 1

Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

I'm against it. Americans need to take their medicine and let the market correct itself. All we're doing with bailouts is alleviating the superficial suffering while ignoring and prolonging the more fundamental problem of easy money and government meddling in the economy. People like to blame the financial institutions for this debacle but let us remember who financed and provided the regulatory impetus for these high-risk lending practices - the government.

By subsidizing down-payments and closing-costs for low-income, first-time homebuyers the government forced lenders to assume risks they would not have otherwise incurred. Not suprisingly, the vast majority of these high-risk loans went sour and sent a shockwave through the financial sector. Had not the government introduced this artificiality into the housing market the bubble would have been less substantial and its collapse less precipitous. Economics 101.
Ethereal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-24-08, 06:00 PM   #44
Language,Borders,Culture

 
MC.no.spin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday 11:34 PM
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,360
Thanks: 978
Thanked 977 Times in 582 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
I believe I have addressed the issue.
If you took out a loan you should not have, you're responsible for it.
If you lent out a loan you should not have, you're responsible for it.
If that causes the entire economy to sink -- that's the way it goes.
I disagree with this selfish philosophy, and I guess that's why I'm not a die-hard Libertarian.
When we make decisions in life, we base them on what is the most pro-survival thing to do. That includes our families and friends. That includes our city, our state, our country and the world.
What you're willing to concede in order to stand on principle, which on one aspect is commendable, is a the same time irresponsible. It's irresponsible because we are under one Constitution, and that exists to form a more perfect union. And that union faces great danger at this time.
This "let the economy sink" attitude should be fully cognizant of history, so let me confirm you are aware of what you are willing to accept, for the sake of standing on principle.

1930s Great Depression

In the cities, thousands of jobless men roamed the streets, looking for work. It wasn't unusual for 2,000 or 3,000 applicants to show up for one or two job openings. If they weren't looking for work, they were looking for food. Bread lines were established to stop people from starving. And more than a million families lost their houses and took up residence in shantytowns made up of tents, packing crates, and the hulks of old cars. They were called "Hoovervilles," a mocking reference to President Hoover, whom many blamed (somewhat unfairly) for the mess the country was in.

Thousands of farmers left their homes in states like Oklahoma and Arkansas and headed for the promise of better days in the West, especially California. What they found there, however, was most often a backbreaking existence as migrant laborers, living in squalid camps, and picking fruit for starvation wages.

More than half of African Americans still lived in the South, most as tenant farmers or "sharecroppers," meaning they farmed someone else's land. Almost all of those who worked and weren't farmers held menial jobs that whites hadn't wanted — until the Depression came along. When it did, the African Americans were shoved out of their jobs. As many as 400,000 left the South for cities in the North, which didn't help much. By 1932, it's estimated half of the black U.S. population was on some form of relief.

Analyzing the Causes and Consequences of the Great Depression - For Dummies

Though the U.S. economy had gone into depression six months earlier, the Great Depression may be said to have begun with a catastrophic collapse of stock-market prices on the New York Stock Exchange in October 1929. During the next three years stock prices in the United States continued to fall, until by late 1932 they had dropped to only about 20 percent of their value in 1929. Besides ruining many thousands of individual investors, this precipitous decline in the value of assets greatly strained banks and other financial institutions, particularly those holding stocks in their portfolios. Many banks were consequently forced into insolvency; by 1933, 11,000 of the United States' 25,000 banks had failed. The failure of so many banks, combined with a general and nationwide loss of confidence in the economy, led to much-reduced levels of spending and demand and hence of production, thus aggravating the downward spiral. The result was drastically falling output and drastically rising unemployment; by 1932, U.S. manufacturing output had fallen to 54 percent of its 1929 level, and unemployment had risen to between 12 and 15 million workers, or 25-30 percent of the work force.

The Great Depression began in the United States but quickly turned into a worldwide economic slump owing to the special and intimate relationships that had been forged between the United States and European economies after World War I. The United States had emerged from the war as the major creditor and financier of postwar Europe, whose national economies had been greatly weakened by the war itself, by war debts, and, in the case of Germany and other defeated nations, by the need to pay war reparations. So once the American economy slumped and the flow of American investment credits to Europe dried up, prosperity tended to collapse there as well. The Depression hit hardest those nations that were most deeply indebted to the United States, i.e., Germany and Great Britain. In Germany, unemployment rose sharply beginning in late 1929, and by early 1932 it had reached 6 million workers, or 25 percent of the work force. Britain was less severely affected, but its industrial and export sectors remained seriously depressed until World War II. Many other countries had been affected by the slump by 1931.

Almost all nations sought to protect their domestic production by imposing tariffs, raising existing ones, and setting quotas on foreign imports. The effect of these restrictive measures was to greatly reduce the volume of international trade: by 1932 the total value of world trade had fallen by more than half as country after country took measures against the importation of foreign goods.

The Great Depression had important consequences in the political sphere. In the United States, economic distress led to the election of the Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt to the presidency in late 1932. Roosevelt introduced a number of major changes in the structure of the American economy, using increased government regulation and massive public-works projects to promote a recovery. But despite this active intervention, mass unemployment and economic stagnation continued, though on a somewhat reduced scale, with about 15 percent of the work force still unemployed in 1939 at the outbreak of World War II. After that, unemployment dropped rapidly as American factories were flooded with orders from overseas for armaments and munitions. The depression ended completely soon after the United States' entry into World War II in 1941. In Europe, the Great Depression strengthened extremist forces and lowered the prestige of liberal democracy. In Germany, economic distress directly contributed to Adolf Hitler's rise to power in 1933. The Nazis' public-works projects and their rapid expansion of munitions production ended the Depression there by 1936.

At least in part, the Great Depression was caused by underlying weaknesses and imbalances within the U.S. economy that had been obscured by the boom psychology and speculative euphoria of the 1920s. The Depression exposed those weaknesses, as it did the inability of the nation's political and financial institutions to cope with the vicious downward economic cycle that had set in by 1930. Prior to the Great Depression, governments traditionally took little or no action in times of business downturn, relying instead on impersonal market forces to achieve the necessary economic correction. But market forces alone proved unable to achieve the desired recovery in the early years of the Great Depression, and this painful discovery eventually inspired some fundamental changes in the United States' economic structure. After the Great Depression, government action, whether in the form of taxation, industrial regulation, public works, social insurance, social-welfare services, or deficit spending, came to assume a principal role in ensuring economic stability in most industrial nations with market economies.


About the Great Depression



So ask yourself this: Are you willing to have your friends and family be exposed to the very high risk of some of them having to live in "Bushville?"
__________________
"The guy’s a phony. He has no experience, he has no record; he’s not nearly ready to be commander in chief."
Bill Clinton on Obama (from the book Game Change)

Last edited by MC.no.spin; 09-24-08 at 06:05 PM.
MC.no.spin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-24-08, 06:33 PM   #45
Professor

 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Last Seen: 11-07-08 12:13 PM
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 1,788
Thanks: 306
Thanked 394 Times in 288 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Male
Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MC.no.spin View Post
...
I respect your post.
And if we did hit something similar to a great depression where even the middle class are starving, i fully understand how bad it would be.
Living through many hurricanes has taught me a lot about just how fragile we have become and dependant on gas, power, and money.

We would not survive a real Great Depression.
That is one reason i am more concerned about Foriegn Policy, (A World War would cause a Great Depression) but i will toss that aside for now.
We've become too dependent and too fragile.

But i am also not convinced that letting bad businesses fail would cause a "Great Depression".
A Depression yes.
But things are very different now. We have the economic infrastructure in place. The equipment, the training and education.
All of these things were lacking within our Country during the Great Depression.
It is my opinion that once we hit bottom we would not stay there for long.
People who were pumped up on credit will simply have to face reality.
People who are used to paying with cash, might also not be affected as much as you think by the collapse.

Also some of the candidates have plans to put Americans to work that are already in existance.
I am not familiar with McCain's plan for this, but I know Obama intends to put 5 million Americans to work through Government money for alternate energy.
If we did fail to do the bailout, there are still mutiple ways that the Government can help the economy and the American worker.
Stable businesses will still find credit if they deserve it.

I do not see it as a Great Depression as much as I see it as a Great bubble bursting that will equalize wealth.
If we do recover quickly, then the poor would not be effected but the middle and upper class would be forced to live within their means instead of off the backs of the labor of others.

I can not put my finger on "why".
But something seems terribly wrong to have a society where most money is made by shuffling paper.
Especially when the CEO to worker rate of pay is 2000:1.
And when over 80% of our society is living on borrowed credit.

It might be that this crisis is the natural result of the above and that a bailout will do nothing without changing those things along with it.
And there is no one even remotely considering changing any of those things.
So it might be that we have to learn from failing before we can do anything about this.
__________________
"We are all Georgians". No Mr. McCain, We are all Americans.
John1234 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-24-08, 06:42 PM   #46
Capitalist Fat-Cat

 
Ethereal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday 10:21 PM
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,189
Thanks: 7,738
Thanked 4,165 Times in 2,347 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

US Marines:   
Total Awards: 1

Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

Quote:
I disagree with this selfish philosophy, and I guess that's why I'm not a die-hard Libertarian.
When we make decisions in life, we base them on what is the most pro-survival thing to do. That includes our families and friends. That includes our city, our state, our country and the world.
What you're willing to concede in order to stand on principle, which on one aspect is commendable, is a the same time irresponsible. It's irresponsible because we are under one Constitution, and that exists to form a more perfect union. And that union faces great danger at this time.
This "let the economy sink" attitude should be fully cognizant of history, so let me confirm you are aware of what you are willing to accept, for the sake of standing on principle.

1930s Great Depression

In the cities, thousands of jobless men roamed the streets, looking for work. It wasn't unusual for 2,000 or 3,000 applicants to show up for one or two job openings. If they weren't looking for work, they were looking for food. Bread lines were established to stop people from starving. And more than a million families lost their houses and took up residence in shantytowns made up of tents, packing crates, and the hulks of old cars. They were called "Hoovervilles," a mocking reference to President Hoover, whom many blamed (somewhat unfairly) for the mess the country was in.

Thousands of farmers left their homes in states like Oklahoma and Arkansas and headed for the promise of better days in the West, especially California. What they found there, however, was most often a backbreaking existence as migrant laborers, living in squalid camps, and picking fruit for starvation wages.

More than half of African Americans still lived in the South, most as tenant farmers or "sharecroppers," meaning they farmed someone else's land. Almost all of those who worked and weren't farmers held menial jobs that whites hadn't wanted — until the Depression came along. When it did, the African Americans were shoved out of their jobs. As many as 400,000 left the South for cities in the North, which didn't help much. By 1932, it's estimated half of the black U.S. population was on some form of relief.

Analyzing the Causes and Consequences of the Great Depression - For Dummies

Though the U.S. economy had gone into depression six months earlier, the Great Depression may be said to have begun with a catastrophic collapse of stock-market prices on the New York Stock Exchange in October 1929. During the next three years stock prices in the United States continued to fall, until by late 1932 they had dropped to only about 20 percent of their value in 1929. Besides ruining many thousands of individual investors, this precipitous decline in the value of assets greatly strained banks and other financial institutions, particularly those holding stocks in their portfolios. Many banks were consequently forced into insolvency; by 1933, 11,000 of the United States' 25,000 banks had failed. The failure of so many banks, combined with a general and nationwide loss of confidence in the economy, led to much-reduced levels of spending and demand and hence of production, thus aggravating the downward spiral. The result was drastically falling output and drastically rising unemployment; by 1932, U.S. manufacturing output had fallen to 54 percent of its 1929 level, and unemployment had risen to between 12 and 15 million workers, or 25-30 percent of the work force.

The Great Depression began in the United States but quickly turned into a worldwide economic slump owing to the special and intimate relationships that had been forged between the United States and European economies after World War I. The United States had emerged from the war as the major creditor and financier of postwar Europe, whose national economies had been greatly weakened by the war itself, by war debts, and, in the case of Germany and other defeated nations, by the need to pay war reparations. So once the American economy slumped and the flow of American investment credits to Europe dried up, prosperity tended to collapse there as well. The Depression hit hardest those nations that were most deeply indebted to the United States, i.e., Germany and Great Britain. In Germany, unemployment rose sharply beginning in late 1929, and by early 1932 it had reached 6 million workers, or 25 percent of the work force. Britain was less severely affected, but its industrial and export sectors remained seriously depressed until World War II. Many other countries had been affected by the slump by 1931.

Almost all nations sought to protect their domestic production by imposing tariffs, raising existing ones, and setting quotas on foreign imports. The effect of these restrictive measures was to greatly reduce the volume of international trade: by 1932 the total value of world trade had fallen by more than half as country after country took measures against the importation of foreign goods.

The Great Depression had important consequences in the political sphere. In the United States, economic distress led to the election of the Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt to the presidency in late 1932. Roosevelt introduced a number of major changes in the structure of the American economy, using increased government regulation and massive public-works projects to promote a recovery. But despite this active intervention, mass unemployment and economic stagnation continued, though on a somewhat reduced scale, with about 15 percent of the work force still unemployed in 1939 at the outbreak of World War II. After that, unemployment dropped rapidly as American factories were flooded with orders from overseas for armaments and munitions. The depression ended completely soon after the United States' entry into World War II in 1941. In Europe, the Great Depression strengthened extremist forces and lowered the prestige of liberal democracy. In Germany, economic distress directly contributed to Adolf Hitler's rise to power in 1933. The Nazis' public-works projects and their rapid expansion of munitions production ended the Depression there by 1936.

At least in part, the Great Depression was caused by underlying weaknesses and imbalances within the U.S. economy that had been obscured by the boom psychology and speculative euphoria of the 1920s. The Depression exposed those weaknesses, as it did the inability of the nation's political and financial institutions to cope with the vicious downward economic cycle that had set in by 1930. Prior to the Great Depression, governments traditionally took little or no action in times of business downturn, relying instead on impersonal market forces to achieve the necessary economic correction. But market forces alone proved unable to achieve the desired recovery in the early years of the Great Depression, and this painful discovery eventually inspired some fundamental changes in the United States' economic structure. After the Great Depression, government action, whether in the form of taxation, industrial regulation, public works, social insurance, social-welfare services, or deficit spending, came to assume a principal role in ensuring economic stability in most industrial nations with market economies.


About the Great Depression


So ask yourself this: Are you willing to have your friends and family be exposed to the very high risk of some of them having to live in "Bushville?"
This is all well and good but there are many who posit the Great Depression was prolonged by government intervention.
Ethereal is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-24-08, 06:52 PM   #47
Language,Borders,Culture

 
MC.no.spin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday 11:34 PM
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,360
Thanks: 978
Thanked 977 Times in 582 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John1234 View Post
I respect your post.
And if we did hit something similar to a great depression where even the middle class are starving, i fully understand how bad it would be.
Living through many hurricanes has taught me a lot about just how fragile we have become and dependant on gas, power, and money.

We would not survive a real Great Depression.
That is one reason i am more concerned about Foriegn Policy, (A World War would cause a Great Depression) but i will toss that aside for now.
We've become too dependent and too fragile.

But i am also not convinced that letting bad businesses fail would cause a "Great Depression".
A Depression yes.
But things are very different now. We have the economic infrastructure in place. The equipment, the training and education.
All of these things were lacking within our Country during the Great Depression.
It is my opinion that once we hit bottom we would not stay there for long.
People who were pumped up on credit will simply have to face reality.
People who are used to paying with cash, might also not be affected as much as you think by the collapse.

Also some of the candidates have plans to put Americans to work that are already in existance.
I am not familiar with McCain's plan for this, but I know Obama intends to put 5 million Americans to work through Government money for alternate energy.
If we did fail to do the bailout, there are still mutiple ways that the Government can help the economy and the American worker.
Stable businesses will still find credit if they deserve it.

I do not see it as a Great Depression as much as I see it as a Great bubble bursting that will equalize wealth.
If we do recover quickly, then the poor would not be effected but the middle and upper class would be forced to live within their means instead of off the backs of the labor of others.

I can not put my finger on "why".
But something seems terribly wrong to have a society where most money is made by shuffling paper.
Especially when the CEO to worker rate of pay is 2000:1.
And when over 80% of our society is living on borrowed credit.

It might be that this crisis is the natural result of the above and that a bailout will do nothing without changing those things along with it.
And there is no one even remotely considering changing any of those things.
So it might be that we have to learn from failing before we can do anything about this.
With all due respect, I believe you are implying you have a hither-to unannounced phD in Economics that guides your analysis of this situation, rather than listening to economic experts like the gentleman on this video, who predicted a Great Depression scenario for this country over six months ago because of this crisis he saw coming:

YouTube - 3/1 CNN Your Money: Talks of Great Depression Coming

I'm sure in your chosen profession you don't rely on the plumber to give you advice on painting. If you need advice, you seek it from someone who has the knowledge and experience to tell you what's going on. I'm sure there is a lot of clamor for such action as you recommend out there, but I've yet to hear it from one economist that has my respect.
__________________
"The guy’s a phony. He has no experience, he has no record; he’s not nearly ready to be commander in chief."
Bill Clinton on Obama (from the book Game Change)
MC.no.spin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-24-08, 06:52 PM   #48
Guru

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Seen: 02-03-10 06:56 PM
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,415
Thanks: 21
Thanked 322 Times in 246 Posts
Gender: Male
Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MC.no.spin View Post

And more than a million families lost their houses and took up residence in shantytowns made up of tents, packing crates, and the hulks of old cars. They were called "Hoovervilles," a mocking reference to President Hoover, whom many blamed (somewhat unfairly) for the mess the country was in.

...

So ask yourself this: Are you willing to have your friends and family be exposed to the very high risk of some of them having to live in "Bushville?"
I'm sure the President is terrified this may be part of his legacy. That's no reason to make us pay for it, though.
tryreading is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-24-08, 07:00 PM   #49
Language,Borders,Culture

 
MC.no.spin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday 11:34 PM
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 3,360
Thanks: 978
Thanked 977 Times in 582 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Male
Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryreading View Post
I'm sure the President is terrified this may be part of his legacy. That's no reason to make us pay for it, though.
He'll be on tonight at 6 Pacific 9 Eastern to tell us what he thinks.

I suggest everyone keep partisanship out of their thought process on whether this 700 Billion Dollar investment in America is a good one or not.
__________________
"The guy’s a phony. He has no experience, he has no record; he’s not nearly ready to be commander in chief."
Bill Clinton on Obama (from the book Game Change)
MC.no.spin is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-24-08, 07:14 PM   #50
Guru

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Seen: 02-03-10 06:56 PM
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,415
Thanks: 21
Thanked 322 Times in 246 Posts
Gender: Male
Re: How do you feel about the 700 Billion Dollar Bailout for Investment Banks?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MC.no.spin View Post
He'll be on tonight at 6 Pacific 9 Eastern to tell us what he thinks.

I suggest everyone keep partisanship out of their thought process on whether this 700 Billion Dollar investment in America is a good one or not.
Investment in America?
tryreading is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/archives/36723-do-you-feel-700-billion-dollar-bailout-investment-banks.html
Posted By For Type Date
Smart Car Epa Ranking, Smart Car Economy, Smart Car For 2 - Indianmasturbating This thread Refback 03-08-09 06:07 AM
Essay 1 « JasonChan08 This thread Pingback 10-03-08 08:35 AM
Want $2,300 With No Catch? MUST SEE & REPOST!!! This thread Refback 09-25-08 09:53 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts