Possible Palin Scandal Already?

CaptainCourtesy · 09-02-08, 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Summerwind

CC, I agree if you are looking solely at those saying its the daughter's baby. However aps, 1069, FDino and I have all said we would actually have good thoughts regarding her compassion should we find that to be true.

This is how I am looking at it...that the claim it that it isn't Sarah's baby. That is the OP and the direction of the thread. A false smear. The other issue you discuss is about judgment and character and is legitimate in discussion, but I would like to see some facts from both sides. I've seen some information, but nothing conclusive.

Quote:

For me and I believe somehwhat for 1069, FDino and aps, the concern is much greater that it IS SARAH's CHILD such that in this case the FACTS of what she did in a potentially emergency situaion (finish speech, travel 8+hours, land and travel another hour) a valid and reasonable way to judge her ability to handle potential emergencies. . . and she fails. Nothing conspiracy about it. And I surely question you being a liberal or a conservative if you think this kind of poor judgment should be ignored.

See above.

Gladiator · 09-02-08, 02:51 AM

CNN reported that Sarah Palin will not make any pubic appearances or answer any questions today. Palin is reportedly working on her VP acceptance speech. May deliver the speech tonight, Tuesday, 9-2-08.

The McCain staff members I saw on CNN asked only for privacy, and did not directly respond to the questions of whether Bristol was Trig's mother. The McCain staffers did not explain why Bristol had been out of school for several months of the 2007-2008 school year.

The CNN video clip of Palin with her family showed Trig being carried by Bristol. Bristol did look preganant. Trig looked comfortable being carried by Bristol.

McCain's staff provided no more info on Troopergate. CNN reported that Palin had hired an attorney some two weeks ago to help with the ethics investigation in Alaska about her firing of the Alaska Police Chief, allegedly for his failure to fire her ex-brother-in-law, her sister's ex-husband. So now Palin can answer questions about Troopergate by referring questioners to her lawyer.

CNN reports the Republican Evangelicals are happy with Trig's and Sarah's decisions not to opt for choice, in the current situation, whatever the reality of the situation may me.

..

CaptainCourtesy · 09-02-08, 02:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gladiator

The CNN video clip of Palin with her family showed Trig being carried by Bristol. Bristol did look preganant. Trig looked comfortable being carried by Bristol.

When you have more evidence then a sister carrying her brother and how someone looks, let us know.

Felicity · 09-02-08, 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gladiator

CNN reports the Republican Evangelicals are happy with Trig's and Sarah's decisions not to opt for choice, in the current situation, whatever the reality of the situation may me.

..

Choosing to carry a baby when you could have it sucked or flushed out of your womb for political expediency IS a "choice."

Summerwind · 09-02-08, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaptainCourtesy

This is how I am looking at it...that the claim it that it isn't Sarah's baby. That is the OP and the direction of the thread. A false smear. The other issue you discuss is about judgment and character and is legitimate in discussion, but I would like to see some facts from both sides. I've seen some information, but nothing conclusive.

See above.

Well it is an either / or situation. It is difficult to discuss one without wondering about the possibility of the other. They are pretty much intertwined that way.

Summerwind · 09-02-08, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felicity

Choosing to carry a baby when you could have it sucked or flushed out of your womb for political expediency IS a "choice."

I agree, comments like that one (and I mean that one, not the whole post) are the reasons so many pro-lifers seem to think we pro-choicers promote abortion rather than promoting choice. It is wrong to lump the two by your side or by our side.

Felicity · 09-02-08, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Summerwind

I agree, comments like that one (and I mean that one, not the whole post) are the reasons so many pro-lifers seem to think we pro-choicers promote abortion rather than promoting choice. It is wrong to lump the two by your side or by our side.

Then you can also see how calling Pro-Life "Anti-Choice" is a load.

Summerwind · 09-02-08, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Felicity

Then you can also see how calling Pro-Life "Anti-Choice" is a load.

No I don't them as being the same. Pro-life is anti-choice. Pro-choice should mean choose either life or abortion, thereby no anti's at all.

Reverend_Hellh0und · 09-02-08, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Summerwind

No I don't them as being the same. Pro-life is anti-choice. Pro-choice should mean choose either life or abortion, thereby no anti's at all.

Freudian slip?

Do you choose life or not life...... good way to put it.

Zyphlin · 09-02-08, 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Summerwind

No I don't them as being the same. Pro-life is anti-choice. Pro-choice should mean choose either life or abortion, thereby no anti's at all.

Anti-Chocie is just as partisan and smear worthy as "Anti-life".

Sure, you can rationalize it out so it "makes sense" to you so you can use it against your opposite side.

The same can be rationalized for pro-abortion

"you're in favor of allowing abortions, and therefore against protecting the life of children, therefore you are anti-life".

Look, I rationalized too!

09-02-08, 02:51 AM	#212
Gladiator Verifier Join Date: Jun 2007 Last Seen: Yesterday 06:05 PM Location: Your Back Yard Posts: 1,685 Thanks: 477 Thanked 163 Times in 133 Posts Gender:	Re: Possible Palin Scandal Already? CNN reported that Sarah Palin will not make any pubic appearances or answer any questions today. Palin is reportedly working on her VP acceptance speech. May deliver the speech tonight, Tuesday, 9-2-08. The McCain staff members I saw on CNN asked only for privacy, and did not directly respond to the questions of whether Bristol was Trig's mother. The McCain staffers did not explain why Bristol had been out of school for several months of the 2007-2008 school year. The CNN video clip of Palin with her family showed Trig being carried by Bristol. Bristol did look preganant. Trig looked comfortable being carried by Bristol. McCain's staff provided no more info on Troopergate. CNN reported that Palin had hired an attorney some two weeks ago to help with the ethics investigation in Alaska about her firing of the Alaska Police Chief, allegedly for his failure to fire her ex-brother-in-law, her sister's ex-husband. So now Palin can answer questions about Troopergate by referring questioners to her lawyer. CNN reports the Republican Evangelicals are happy with Trig's and Sarah's decisions not to opt for choice, in the current situation, whatever the reality of the situation may me. ..
	__________________ _______________________________ How did Our Oil get under Their Sand? Last edited by Gladiator; 09-02-08 at 02:53 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/archives/35367-possible-palin-scandal-already.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date
Michelle Malkin » Bristol Palin chooses life. Now leave her alone.	This thread	Refback	02-23-09 12:57 PM
Michelle Malkin » Bristol Palin chooses life. Now leave her alone.	This thread	Refback	10-08-08 01:42 PM
Sarah Palin and Family \| Right Voices	Post #207	Pingback	09-01-08 08:13 PM