![]() |
|
|
|
#51 | |
|
King of Videos
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Last Seen: Yesterday 09:48 PM
Location: Mount Vernon, WA
Posts: 2,814
Thanks: 464
Thanked 402 Times in 298 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
|
Re: On a civillian national police or "national security" force
Quote:
|
|
|
__________________
America. God is wearing black. |
||
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Free Market Terrorist
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Today 10:36 AM
Location: Newburgh, New York
Posts: 5,923
Thanks: 1,253
Thanked 1,430 Times in 879 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender:
![]() |
Re: On a civillian national police or "national security" force
Bad idea all around, its just another power the federal government shouldnt have.
|
|
__________________
Blog: http://libertarianblue.blogspot.com/ Death to Socialist Liberals and Authoritarian Conservatives |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Guru
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2006
Last Seen: Today 12:30 AM
Posts: 2,593
Thanks: 957
Thanked 294 Times in 193 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender:
![]() |
Re: On a civillian national police or "national security" force
1. What do you think this would/should encompass?
Taken in conjunction with President Elect Obama's stated views, possibly it would encompass all African American or at least those who have a (black) skin. 2. Who would they protect us against. Obviously the Honkies. 3. Who would it be made up of? Black African Americans. 4. How will it be paid for? Extra Taxes on Honkies 5. How will it coexist with a police force You must have added this as a joke? 6. Do you think we even need one AKA is this a good idea. Depends on whether you are an African American or not. |
|
Last edited by jujuman13; 11-09-08 at 12:21 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Constitutionalist
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2006
Last Seen: Yesterday 05:33 AM
Location: VA
Posts: 14,794
Thanks: 2,994
Thanked 2,959 Times in 2,053 Posts
Lean: Conservative
Gender:
![]() |
Re: On a civillian national police or "national security" force
So this could be a Black Panther Army?
|
|
__________________
"Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties which may make anything mean everything or nothing at pleasure." -- Thomas Jefferson יהוה |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Last Seen: 12-22-08 11:53 AM
Posts: 947
Thanks: 169
Thanked 147 Times in 122 Posts
Lean: Private
Gender:
![]() |
Re: On a civillian national police or "national security" force
Obama has declared he is going to be the first person in world history to successfully occupy and control Afghanistan, plus wants to invade Pakistan to find Osama Bin Laden - Pakistan being the most powerful Muslim country and with nuclear weapons, and wants 100,000 more US troops in the military right away.
It is unlikely that Europe will assist Obama in his attempt to successfully conquer and permanently occupy Afghanistan and Pakistan, even if he does give Iraq to Iran. His wars and ongoing occupations of Muslim countries will take a lot of troops, a lot of replacement and there will be a lot of casualties. It would seem likely that with the National Guard, the domestic army Obama wants (to be as large as the regular military), will probably have a clause that allows using Obama's domestic army for foreign action "if deemed necessary." Accordingly, Obama's domestic army would then give him 3 million more American soldiers to throw into conquest and occupation of the Muslim countries Obama has targeted. |
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Norville Rogers
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Seen: Today 10:29 AM
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 1,717 Times in 905 Posts
Gender:
![]() |
Re: On a civillian national police or "national security" force
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Last Seen: 12-22-08 11:53 AM
Posts: 947
Thanks: 169
Thanked 147 Times in 122 Posts
Lean: Private
Gender:
![]() |
Re: On a civillian national police or "national security" force
Yes.
Do you disagree that Obama has vowed to increase US troops in Afghanistan? Do you disagree that while he ranted for a time limit to leave Iraq, he has never proposed one for Afghanistan - where we have been longer? Did you forget Obama in the debate complaining about us not making more attacks into Pakistan without Pakistan's approval? Didn't hear Obama say he wants the US military to be 100,000 more larger? Or that Obama didn't say he wants a domestic military force "equal in size and budget" to the regular US military? Obama has delivered to the military industrial complex what no Republican still could - foreign occupation and fighting (and therefore spending) escalation. Haliburton will make far more off of Obama than they still could off a Republican president. Neither political party opposes war now. |
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|