Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives



 
 
LinkBack (1) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-08, 11:20 PM   #31
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday 01:55 PM
Posts: 10,412
Thanks: 3,653
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,087 Posts

US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 
Total Awards: 1

Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by John_Gault View Post
So I take it that you haven't read the Qu'ran...

Again please post the verse that supports your claim.

The problem with this entire argument of yours is that it doesn't matter what they believe. The bible contains just as much authoritarian world conquering violent BS. It is all a matter of interpretation...

Bottom line, if it isn't a religion it will be something else motivating extremism. To go even further the circumstances and sociology that allowed that ideology to flourish. The blame for the existence of those circumstances cannot be laid at the feet of any one man but again an ideology or for lack of a better term, a policy.

No matter the people, extremism will ALWAYS flourish in the type of environment that exists in the middle east. Look at Germany post WWI (Nazism), the American South post civil war (KKK), Inner-city America (Nation of Islam).

Until we understand that, and realize that leaders will continue to gain power over people in those situations through BLAME we will continue to be an enemy of those less fortunate.

So, carry on with your ranting about a coming religious war. But you will be doing it without me. Much like your (undoubtedly) opinion on foreign policy I refuse to give this thread validity by engaging in "talks".
Trying to draw a false moral equivalence between the Bible and the Koran is futile.

Quote:
...the vicious violence intrinsic to Islamic jihad is not an aberration.

Unlike Christ’s repudiation of faith-propagating violence - “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would fight” (John 18: 36),

Muhammad urges his followers to slay the enemies of Allah - “slay the idolaters wherever you find them” (Sura 9: 5).

While medieval so-called Christian violence [in reality Roman Catholic e.g. the Crusades] was a lapse from Christ’s methods and thus condemned by the New Testament, Islamic violence is in perfect accord with Muhammad’s hostile directives.

Christianity, Islam and British Politics
And what Muslims believe is at the heart of the question. It is entirely pertinent to what is going on in terms of our war on terror or foreign policy, our homeland defense, our energy policy decisions, our border policy our immigration policy our presidential politics and explains our divisiveness in this country and here on this very board.

Your attributing Islamic extremism to motivations other than Koranic injunction only helps confuse the issue.

There are criminals all over the world and there have always been and always will be criminals. And what we do is deal with them as random criminals. But when they band together or organize to act in concert, they gain greater power and influence. Organized crime. Like the Mafia. The Mafia exists to generate revenue through illegal activities.

But what if some people banded together to achieve domination of their religious philosophy over all the world? What if there was a book which taught a code of conduct and helped recruit new members of the philosophy and spelled out laws and politics and their way of life? What if this book was distributed the world over and people who had never met would be on the same page and would independently be following the same instructions to use non-violent or violent efforts to achieve the same goal of global domination?

Would that be different from the average extremist? Would that be different from the average concern of law enforcement? Wouldn't that be different from Christianity?

And show me where I've mentioned anything about a coming "religious war". I may have done so inadvertently.

What I say is that we need to come to a national consensus on Islam so we might embrace Islam or reject it or welcome it with certain precautions or understandings.

Right now we have too many people who are making decisions and are lobbying and advocating about our way of dealing with Islam based on too many different understandings on each extreme and everywhere in between.

We need to be on the same page. Don't you agree?
__________________

OBL 11/24/02
bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-14-08, 11:32 PM   #32
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday 01:55 PM
Posts: 10,412
Thanks: 3,653
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,087 Posts

US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 
Total Awards: 1

Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by RightOfCenter View Post
If they had even close to the power to do this you might have a point, but since they don't...
1.5 Billion Muslims on Earth.

300,000,000 are estimated to support extremism and Islamism.

1.2 Billion to use non-violent Jihad.

I'd say that's more than enough.

For comparison, there are only 130,000 US troops in Iraq.
__________________

OBL 11/24/02
bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-14-08, 11:36 PM   #33
Advisor
 
John_Gault's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Last Seen: 11-25-09 08:48 AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 428
Thanks: 169
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

US Army:  Is currently a SFC in the US Army. Entered in 2000. 
Total Awards: 1

Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhkad View Post
Trying to draw a false moral equivalence between the Bible and the Koran is futile.



And what Muslims believe is at the heart of the question. It is entirely pertinent to what is going on in terms of our war on terror or foreign policy, our homeland defense, our energy policy decisions, our border policy our immigration policy our presidential politics and explains our divisiveness in this country and here on this very board.

Your attributing Islamic extremism to motivations other than Koranic injunction only helps confuse the issue.

There are criminals all over the world and there have always been and always will be criminals. And what we do is deal with them as random criminals. But when they band together or organize to act in concert, they gain greater power and influence. Organized crime. Like the Mafia. The Mafia exists to generate revenue through illegal activities.

But what if some people banded together to achieve domination of their religious philosophy over all the world? What if there was a book which taught a code of conduct and helped recruit new members of the philosophy and spelled out laws and politics and their way of life? What if this book was distributed the world over and people who had never met would be on the same page and would independently be following the same instructions to use non-violent or violent efforts to achieve the same goal of global domination?

Would that be different from the average extremist? Would that be different from the average concern of law enforcement? Wouldn't that be different from Christianity?

And show me where I've mentioned anything about a coming "religious war". I may have done so inadvertently.

What I say is that we need to come to a national consensus on Islam so we might embrace Islam or reject it or welcome it with certain precautions or understandings.

Right now we have too many people who are making decisions and are lobbying and advocating about our way of dealing with Islam based on too many different understandings on each extreme and everywhere in between.

We need to be on the same page. Don't you agree?
America has already embraced Islam...

Freedom of religion in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As for the rest of your argument, you would fit right into the Bush Cabinet with that type of short-sightedness. In every circumstance of large groups of people being motivated to the point of extremism there existed the type of social environment that we see now in the middle east. Any doctrine (including the Bible as you so helpfully pointed out) can be used as a basis for this.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thucydides
The state which separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools.
John_Gault is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-14-08, 11:38 PM   #34
Advisor
 
John_Gault's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Last Seen: 11-25-09 08:48 AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 428
Thanks: 169
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

US Army:  Is currently a SFC in the US Army. Entered in 2000. 
Total Awards: 1

Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhkad View Post
300,000,000 are estimated to support extremism and Islamism.
.......
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thucydides
The state which separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools.
John_Gault is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-14-08, 11:38 PM   #35
Norville Rogers

 
Kernel Sanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Seen: Yesterday 08:49 PM
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 1,717 Times in 905 Posts
Gender: Male
Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhkad View Post
Trying to draw a false moral equivalence between the Bible and the Koran is futile.

Quote:
...the vicious violence intrinsic to Islamic jihad is not an aberration.

Unlike Christ’s repudiation of faith-propagating violence - “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would fight” (John 18: 36),

Muhammad urges his followers to slay the enemies of Allah - “slay the idolaters wherever you find them” (Sura 9: 5).

While medieval so-called Christian violence [in reality Roman Catholic e.g. the Crusades] was a lapse from Christ’s methods and thus condemned by the New Testament, Islamic violence is in perfect accord with Muhammad’s hostile directives.

Christianity, Islam and British Politics
Do you have any idea what that verse means or do you just latch onto it desperately because it has the word "slay" in it? In this verse Muhammad is telling his followers to take up arms against a single specific tribe who had broken agreements with and already attacked Muslims. He is telling his followers to go to war with one single tribe. They happen to be idolaters, and he uses this term to describe them, but religion is not the reason behind it. The verse is not a broad justification of violence against non-believers as even a single minute of research into the sura would tell you. If you want a general guideline for how Muslims should deal with violence, particularly with religious motivations just look to 2:190

Quote:
Fight in the way of Allah those who fight against you, but do not aggress. Allah does not love the aggressors.
Of course you can latch onto a couple of words, put them in a vacuum, and interpret the words instead of their meaning to justify hating others. Then, however, you would be an extremist. Congratulations bhkad, you're everything you hate.

Last edited by Kernel Sanders; 09-14-08 at 11:41 PM.
Kernel Sanders is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-15-08, 12:22 AM   #36
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday 01:55 PM
Posts: 10,412
Thanks: 3,653
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,087 Posts

US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 
Total Awards: 1

Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kernel Sanders View Post
Do you have any idea what that verse means or do you just latch onto it desperately because it has the word "slay" in it? In this verse Muhammad is telling his followers to take up arms against a single specific tribe who had broken agreements with and already attacked Muslims. He is telling his followers to go to war with one single tribe. They happen to be idolaters, and he uses this term to describe them, but religion is not the reason behind it. The verse is not a broad justification of violence against non-believers as even a single minute of research into the sura would tell you. If you want a general guideline for how Muslims should deal with violence, particularly with religious motivations just look to 2:190



Of course you can latch onto a couple of words, put them in a vacuum, and interpret the words instead of their meaning to justify hating others. Then, however, you would be an extremist. Congratulations bhkad, you're everything you hate.
Nah, It simply means that I'm recognizing an interpretation that 300,000,000 Muslims recognize.

Furthermore, I'm also recognizing the non-violent acts of Jihad aimed at helping achieve global Islamic dominance.

I say we reach a national consensus so we can all reach the same understandings.

You should like that. Right?
__________________

OBL 11/24/02
bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-15-08, 12:29 AM   #37
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday 01:55 PM
Posts: 10,412
Thanks: 3,653
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,087 Posts

US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 
Total Awards: 1

Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by John_Gault View Post
America has already embraced Islam...

Freedom of religion in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As for the rest of your argument, you would fit right into the Bush Cabinet with that type of short-sightedness. In every circumstance of large groups of people being motivated to the point of extremism there existed the type of social environment that we see now in the middle east. Any doctrine (including the Bible as you so helpfully pointed out) can be used as a basis for this.
Do you realize the Qu'ran commands Muslims to rest not until Allah is the sole worshiped God?

Do you recognize that this command is basically a theological mandate of never-ending expansion and dominance... by force if necessary?
__________________

OBL 11/24/02
bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-15-08, 12:36 AM   #38
Norville Rogers

 
Kernel Sanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Last Seen: Yesterday 08:49 PM
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 3,380
Thanks: 2,160
Thanked 1,717 Times in 905 Posts
Gender: Male
Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhkad View Post
Do you realize the Qu'ran commands Muslims to rest not until Allah is the sole worshiped God?

Do you recognize that this command is basically a theological mandate of never-ending expansion and dominance... by force if necessary?


I must be having deja-vu
Kernel Sanders is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-15-08, 01:26 AM   #39
Sage

 
bhkad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday 01:55 PM
Posts: 10,412
Thanks: 3,653
Thanked 1,631 Times in 1,087 Posts

US Army:  Army from 30 July 72 - 31 July 75, USMC from 3 Aug 81 - 5 Dec 81 
Total Awards: 1

Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kernel Sanders View Post


I must be having deja-vu
YouTube - Dionne Warwick Deja Vu 1979
__________________

OBL 11/24/02
bhkad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 09-15-08, 08:49 AM   #40
Advisor
 
John_Gault's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Last Seen: 11-25-09 08:48 AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 428
Thanks: 169
Thanked 106 Times in 71 Posts
Lean: Very Conservative
Gender: Male

US Army:  Is currently a SFC in the US Army. Entered in 2000. 
Total Awards: 1

Re: FOR INFIDELS: Duality and Political Islam

Quote:
Originally Posted by bhkad View Post
Do you realize the Qu'ran commands Muslims to rest not until Allah is the sole worshiped God?

Do you recognize that this command is basically a theological mandate of never-ending expansion and dominance... by force if necessary?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thucydides
The state which separates its scholars from its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools.
John_Gault is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/archives/34032-infidels-duality-and-political-islam.html
Posted By For Type Date
Why Islam is a Greater Threat Than Christianity - Political Wrinkles Post #1 Pingback 07-30-08 05:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts