Sen. John Edwards Caught With Mistress And Love Child!

Kandahar · 07-23-08, 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

More than just the Team Obama's bum rush to a quick dismissal of the matter based on insufficient evidence. You are proving my point that you have rushed to judgment without knowing ALL of the facts.

You're absolutely right. I rush to judgment when I hear an outrageous claim with absolutely NO evidence to back it up. If such evidence later appears, then I'll change my mind. Until then, there is absolutely no reason to believe any of this ****.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

Have you perused the info at LarrySinclair.org?

I'll get right on that after I finish skimming the National Enquirer for the latest John Edwards scandal.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

If you file the charges, as Sinclair has, and have the kind evidence Sinclair has, I'd say you are entitled to an investigation which conclusively proves you are telling the truth or that you are telling a lie.

And just what kind of evidence DOES he have? Don't post a big long snippet from his website that I'm not going to read. Just sum up his evidence in a few sentences.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

But in this case it is the AMERICAN PEOPLE who deserve the whole truth. And that is one of Obama's weaknesses. There is too much about him which is not yet known.

Like he has butsekcs with teh mans!

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

I have slept with women on the first date and I can tell you that they knew nothing about me or my intentions but they were often heard to say, "I don't usually do this on the first date, but I can tell you are different."

Pfft.

I was able to deceive them because they wanted to be decived.

It sounds to me like YOU were the one who was deceived, if you believed they didn't usually do that. Sounds to me like you picked up a hooker.

bhkad · 07-23-08, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kandahar

You're absolutely right. I rush to judgment when I hear an outrageous claim with absolutely NO evidence to back it up. If such evidence later appears, then I'll change my mind. Until then, there is absolutely no reason to believe any of this ****.

I'll get right on that after I finish skimming the National Enquirer for the latest John Edwards scandal.

And just what kind of evidence DOES he have? Don't post a big long snippet from his website that I'm not going to read. Just sum up his evidence in a few sentences.

Like he has butsekcs with teh mans!

It sounds to me like YOU were the one who was deceived, if you believed they didn't usually do that. Sounds to me like you picked up a hooker.

Preserved for posterity.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I'll stand aside and allow these comments to settle in your minds. And from there I will trust you to draw your own conclusions.

TheNextEra · 07-23-08, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

And from there I will trust you to draw your own conclusions.

And that conclusion is the National Enquirer is not a credible source.

We figured that one out easily. I'd take a 4 year old more seriously than that trash magazine. Sorry you got duped.

Anyone that believes the National Enquirer is a credible source definately rides the short bus.

winston53660 · 07-23-08, 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

If you file the charges, as Sinclair has, and have the kind evidence Sinclair has, I'd say you are entitled to an investigation which conclusively proves you are telling the truth or that you are telling a lie.

And you know bkhad the Earth is really flat.

The Flat Earth Society -- Home

And you know what is amazing these guys could probably pass a polygraph since they believe this **** unlike your poster boy Sinclair.

bhkad · 07-23-08, 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheNextEra

And that conclusion is the National Enquirer is not a credible source.

We figured that one out easily. I'd take a 4 year old more seriously than that trash magazine. Sorry you got duped.

Anyone that believes the National Enquirer is a credible source definately rides the short bus.

Maybe si. Maybe no. But they definitely spell it, 'definitely.'

bhkad · 07-23-08, 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by winston53660

And you know bkhad the Earth is really flat.

The Flat Earth Society -- Home

And you know what is amazing these guys could probably pass a polygraph since they believe this **** unlike your poster boy Sinclair.

You fellas amaze me.

In essence, you are arguing in favor of impulsiveness, jumping to conclusions, conventional wisdom replacing investigation, judging a book by it's cover and more ominous things like racial profiling.

Well, that sure explains why you are so often proven incorrect on these pages.

'Always go with the obvious answer, or the most emotionally gratifying answer, whether it is right or not.'

It is easier and feels better.

Right?

bhkad · 07-23-08, 11:45 PM

Quote:

Opinion L.A.

National Enquirer alleges John Edwards affair; blogosphere readies salt shaker

Barack Obama's VP shortlist might have gotten shorter: The National Enquirer yesterday published a story claiming it had caught John Edwards meeting with an alleged mistress and illegitimate child. Then again, the Enquirer hasn't been able to produce quotes, photos or even eyewitness accounts. And the mainstream media seems to be ignoring it, for the most part.

TalkLeft, among others, hopes it isn't true. And thus far, the claims don't seem to have hurt Edwards politically — although the Corner has something worth noting:

...after first seeming to take himself out of the running, he put himself back in the race two weeks ago, telling NPR, "I'm prepared to seriously consider anything, anything [Obama] asks me to do for our country."

But yesterday — the day the Enquirer story went live — the Rocky Mountain News reported, "former Sen. John Edwards told a Denver audience Tuesday that now he's plunged into a new kind of campaign, 'to end poverty as we know it in a generation.'"

Wonkette, in its own way, expresses exhaustion at the thought of another Edwards story:

The important question is not “Why is John Edwards cheating on his wife who had cancer?” We know that answer: He’s a Democratic politician. They have affairs with ladies. The important question is “Why do we have to hear about this again now?”

The answer is “Because a tabloid caught him with the mistress and the baby at a hotel!” A love child? Jesus! Bill Clinton must feel a million years old tonight. Joe Klein, too.

Pajamas Media plays savvier-than-thou:

Oh, one last thing, for those of you who say it’s The National Enquirer, how do we know it’s true? I suggest you Google the “National Enquirer and OJ Simpson.” They broke most of the important stories on that case. In general, these days they’re vastly more reliable than The New York Times.

But Outside the Beltway interrupts, "Indeed, the Enquirer breaks legitimate scandals all the time. But they run with all manner of nonsense too — they just don’t care so long as they sell papers." It goes on:

Edwards has been widely touted for another run as vice president, although I can’t see why he’d want to go through that again, especially with his wife in ill health. Certainly, those facts would make the scandal worse, if true. Frankly, I hope it isn’t.

Ditto.

National Enquirer alleges John Edwards affair; blogosphere readies salt shaker : Opinion L.A. : Los Angeles Times

danarhea · 07-24-08, 12:07 AM

Edwards responds to National Enquirer story during his stop in Houston.

He denies it, and calls the Enquirer trash.

Now, it is up to the National Enquirer to put up or shut up. According to them, Edwards ran away from a camera man. Let's see that footage. Time for proof, or maybe time for a libel suit...... But maybe not. a libel suit will certainly sell more copies of that rag, like it has done in the past. And why is the National Enquirer not demanding a DNA test on Edwards and the baby? That would certainly be absolute proof, wouldn't it? Answer that one.

Kandahar · 07-24-08, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

You fellas amaze me.

In essence, you are arguing in favor of impulsiveness, jumping to conclusions, conventional wisdom replacing investigation, judging a book by it's cover and more ominous things like racial profiling.

Well, that sure explains why you are so often proven incorrect on these pages.

'Always go with the obvious answer, or the most emotionally gratifying answer, whether it is right or not.'

It is easier and feels better.

Right?

If the National Enquirer story (or the Larry Sinclair story) is true, then why haven't any REAL media sources published it? Is every single one of them in the pocket of Edwards and Obama, to the extent that they'd forgo huge profits by breaking a bombshell story, in order to cover up for them?

winston53660 · 07-24-08, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bhkad

You fellas amaze me.

In essence, you are arguing in favor of impulsiveness, jumping to conclusions, conventional wisdom replacing investigation, judging a book by it's cover and more ominous things like racial profiling.

Well, that sure explains why you are so often proven incorrect on these pages.

'Always go with the obvious answer, or the most emotionally gratifying answer, whether it is right or not.'

It is easier and feels better.

Right?

LMAO @ you.

And *plonk* form me to you.

07-24-08, 12:07 AM	#58
danarhea Slayer of the DP Newsbot Dungeon Master Join Date: Aug 2005 Last Seen: Today 08:30 PM Location: Houston, TX Posts: 18,126 Thanks: 3,269 Thanked 6,950 Times in 3,356 Posts Lean: Conservative Gender: Total Awards: 1	Re: Sen. John Edwards Caught With Mistress And Love Child! Edwards responds to National Enquirer story during his stop in Houston. He denies it, and calls the Enquirer trash. Now, it is up to the National Enquirer to put up or shut up. According to them, Edwards ran away from a camera man. Let's see that footage. Time for proof, or maybe time for a libel suit...... But maybe not. a libel suit will certainly sell more copies of that rag, like it has done in the past. And why is the National Enquirer not demanding a DNA test on Edwards and the baby? That would certainly be absolute proof, wouldn't it? Answer that one.
	__________________ Jack Kevorkian for President's Physician: 2012 http://danarhea.blogspot.com Last edited by danarhea; 07-24-08 at 12:10 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.debatepolitics.com/archives/33759-sen-john-edwards-caught-mistress-and-love-child.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date
Breitbart.tv » ‘Tabloid Trash’: Edwards Slams Enquirer Account of Rendezvous With Mistress, Love Child	This thread	Refback	07-24-08 03:31 AM
WASALive ! Edwards caught	This thread	Refback	07-23-08 07:59 AM