Debate Politics Forums forum
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives



 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-08, 08:31 PM   #41
DCKRIDN YUR TARDZ

 
TacticalEvilDan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Last Seen: Today 06:06 PM
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 2,299
Thanks: 726
Thanked 731 Times in 458 Posts
Gender: Male
Send a message via ICQ to TacticalEvilDan Send a message via AIM to TacticalEvilDan Send a message via MSN to TacticalEvilDan Send a message via Yahoo to TacticalEvilDan
Re: Pedo-sympathizer while trying to fight Jessica's law reveals what scum lawyers ar

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
Please re-read my previous post, and try for comprehension.


I concede that you haven't said much that makes sense. You make vague noises about "understanding" them but since you're against the sensible solution, what exactly do you propose?
Okay, so, I ask you to prove that "The safest societies are those united in the extermination of predators," and your "proof" is two examples of criminals you think should've been executed.

I ask you why you "debate" me by putting words in my mouth, and you counter with something which doesn't even address my question.

It's obvious that you can't defend your position and aren't interested in an actual discussion.

See you.
__________________
DURKA DURKA JIHAD

"No man is good enough to govern another man without that other's consent."
-- Abraham Lincoln
TacticalEvilDan is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
Old 07-14-08, 01:56 PM   #42
Horrible Bastard

 
Doc Howl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Last Seen: 12-24-08 12:38 AM
Posts: 3,076
Thanks: 113
Thanked 581 Times in 388 Posts
Gender: Male
Re: Pedo-sympathizer while trying to fight Jessica's law reveals what scum lawyers ar

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diogenes View Post
Please re-read my previous post, and try for comprehension.


I concede that you haven't said much that makes sense. You make vague noises about "understanding" them but since you're against the sensible solution, what exactly do you propose?
Wait. This thread is about the lawyer.

Do you believe in jury trials or not?
__________________
Cet Asshat est mechant; on l'attaque, il se defende.
Doc Howl is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2009
no new posts