Skip

Who knows what ramifications this will have...

Water-Powered Car Demonstrated in Japan (Video)

__________________
"Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed." President Bush, under "Mission Accomplished" banner, May 1, 2003.
Since then, more than 3,970 American soldiers have died in Iraq.

rathi

From what I have seen is that either the articles aren't quoting them correctly, or they are making claims that break the laws of physics. Treat this with heavy skepticism.

__________________
He'd be right at home on some ancient battlefield, swinging an axe into somebody's face.

Skip

I'm no scientist, but if we can get cars to run on hydrogen, why couldn't we break apart a water molecule and just release the oxygen?

__________________
"Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed." President Bush, under "Mission Accomplished" banner, May 1, 2003.
Since then, more than 3,970 American soldiers have died in Iraq.

rathi

The wikipedia article explains it pretty clearly. You need energy to break the water into oxygen and hydrogen.

Genepax - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

__________________
He'd be right at home on some ancient battlefield, swinging an axe into somebody's face.

Lachean

Lisa! In This House We Respect The Laws Of Thermodynamics!

__________________
At the root of every civilized achievement, such as science, technology, progress, freedom--at the root of every value we enjoy today, including the birth of this country--you will find the achievement of one man, who lived over two thousand years ago: Aristotle.

Ikari

It looked to me that there was a power source of sorts used for the disassociation process in the back seat. You can't just break down water by itself and run a car and make water in the end. It takes more energy to break down the water then you'll get on the outside, so there's definitely a necessary secondary source necessary to break down the water into oxygen and hydrogen.

__________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

Indy

I don't really want to get into this too deeply but a car running on water does not violate the first or the second law of thermodynamics. These laws are thrown about quite often by people who don't understand them (see creationism arguments for examples).

If this car were to run ENTIRELY on water, yes that would be a violation. Clearly though this car still has a battery, which will eventually be consumed and die, i.e. no violation of the first law. As for the second law, the increase in entropy, I'm not exactly sure why anyone would think that a water fueled car would violate this. A car can NEVER be considered a closed system so therefore the second law of thermodynamics isn't even applicable.

__________________
Affiant further sayeth not.

Ikari

That's not what is being claimed by the company. They say water goes in, water comes out and that's the only reactant and product of the engine. Nothing else, no battery no external energy source, no nothing. The car clearly can not run if the engine violated the second law of thermodynamics, so obviously there is external energy sources somewhere for the disassociation process. But for what the company claims is going on, it couldn't work as it does violate the second law of thermodynamics.

__________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

Lachean

I don't think anyone said that "a car powered by water violates the laws of thermodynamics" Rathi quite clearly stated that:

rathi said this because the article itself clearly states that:

"we see another car that is powered completely by good old H2O"

Powered "completely" by liquid H20 was the claim in question that violated the laws, given that if h20 were the only source, that isn't a closed system but a system producing more energy than intrinsically exists in its fuel source.

More out than in is NOT physically possible.

__________________
At the root of every civilized achievement, such as science, technology, progress, freedom--at the root of every value we enjoy today, including the birth of this country--you will find the achievement of one man, who lived over two thousand years ago: Aristotle.

Indy

I'm not sure what the company exactly is claiming about this car, I only bothered to watch the video once and it was during work so only half of my brain was paying attention. If they are claiming that absolutely no other source of energy is present then, yes, they are full of it. If this is the case, I don't really blame the company or the engineers as much as their stupid marketing people who wanted to generalize the process for the common man. No battery = violation of the 1st law, which as far as we know if impossible so there obviously has to be a battery.

__________________
Affiant further sayeth not.