Debate Politics Forums
Speak your voice
Go Back   Debate Politics Forums > Debate Politics Forum > Archives

Archives Contraception Drugs and Pharmacist Refusal; Originally Posted by 1069 Actually, I'm fairly certain that "FACT" #2 is bull****, but in any case, ...

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-29-08, 07:15 AM   #21 (permalink)
Advisor
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Last Online: 10-18-08 04:12 AM
Location: New England
Posts: 521
Thanks: 49
Thanked 53 Times in 42 Posts
Lean: Independent
Gender: Female

Current Mood:
Chatty
Re: Contraception Drugs and Pharmacist Refusal

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1069 View Post
Actually, I'm fairly certain that "FACT" #2 is bull****, but in any case, who cares?.....
My disillusionment with the pill had to do with its inefficacy in preventing pregnancy- and the world's insistence that the pill is 99.99999% effective and anyone who gets pregnant on the pill is a retarded hoebag who probably forgot to take it regularly (preposterous; I forget a pill, I bleed for the rest of the pill pack- beginning about four hours after the forgotten pill. It's not like I wouldn't know immediately if I forgot a pill).
So then you just proved FACT #2...since you CAN get pregnant on the Pill, and implantation is required for that, therefore the Pill allows implantation. Implantations that result in babies are the ones we know about.
__________________
Rev.

God doesn't send anyone to hell. We go to hell over His dead body.
Rev. is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Inline Ads
Old 03-31-08, 10:00 AM   #22 (permalink)
Guru

 
Ikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 09:42 PM
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,630
Thanks: 336
Thanked 1,214 Times in 748 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Bookworm
Re: Contraception Drugs and Pharmacist Refusal

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryreading View Post
Restaurants are regulated already. So are pharmacies. Neither of the two types of businesses can sell whatever they want to.
Restaurants are private business, the regulation is in the service to customers. The checks are to ensure proper food handling/storing etc is taking place...not demanding what be on the menu. Should an upstanding French restaurant be forced to sell cheeseburgers? It's food right? No, instead the only rightful place for the government is to ensure quality of product going to the consumer. And that's the same way with pharmacies, though with a bit more because one of the government's concerns is with prescription drugs finding their way to the streets. The regulations are there to make sure the pharmacist knows what he/she is doing, that they are trained in the job and know what they're supposed to do, to make sure that the drugs are stored safely, to ensure that logs of all drug transactions are kept, etc. What it can't do is force them to sell all drugs. The regulations make sure there is qualification and that things are taken care of drug wise, after that the owner of the business may sell whatever legal thing he feels is appropriate for his business. If that's not birth control, then that's that. Can't force him to sell it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryreading View Post
If trans fat, or, for instance, vioxx, is being sold to people who don't know the danger, I think government should regulate either situation. These things are unhealthy man made concoctions that cause harm. Nothing wrong with controlling their sale.
The government can tell you it's not healthy for you, it can require that the restaurant inform its customers that it could be in the food (though this could be taken care of with a healthy dose of thinking...which doesn't seem to be in trend with the nanny-staters). It's not the government's place to keep us fit and healthy, that's our job to do ourselves. While there are some reasonable expectations one can gain through the use of some government regulation; in the end if you don't do it for yourself, you are going to loose all ability to do things for yourself. While the government can make sure that there aren't any contaminates in food which will kill or make us real sick; it can't protect us from everything (nor is that its job). So learn to do things for yourself.
__________________
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

Last edited by Ikari : 03-31-08 at 10:01 AM.
Ikari is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 03-31-08, 09:14 PM   #23 (permalink)
Guru

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: Today 08:38 AM
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,227
Thanks: 14
Thanked 272 Times in 202 Posts
Gender: Male

Re: Contraception Drugs and Pharmacist Refusal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikari View Post

The government can tell you it's not healthy for you, it can require that the restaurant inform its customers that it could be in the food (though this could be taken care of with a healthy dose of thinking...which doesn't seem to be in trend with the nanny-staters). It's not the government's place to keep us fit and healthy, that's our job to do ourselves. While there are some reasonable expectations one can gain through the use of some government regulation; in the end if you don't do it for yourself, you are going to loose all ability to do things for yourself. While the government can make sure that there aren't any contaminates in food which will kill or make us real sick; it can't protect us from everything (nor is that its job). So learn to do things for yourself.
I do everything for myself, that's why I'm familiar with trans fats and other saturated fats, whether man-made or not.

Trans fat is a contaminant in food that 'will kill us or make us real sick.' The people who sell it don't necessarily care what it does to the average American. They may only care that it saves them money. So what you end up with is people harming other people without telling them about it. Nothing wrong with regulating that.
tryreading is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 04-01-08, 10:02 AM   #24 (permalink)
Guru

 
Ikari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Last Online: Yesterday 09:42 PM
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,630
Thanks: 336
Thanked 1,214 Times in 748 Posts
Lean: Libertarian
Gender: Male

Current Mood:
Bookworm
Re: Contraception Drugs and Pharmacist Refusal

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryreading View Post
I do everything for myself, that's why I'm familiar with trans fats and other saturated fats, whether man-made or not.

Trans fat is a contaminant in food that 'will kill us or make us real sick.' The people who sell it don't necessarily care what it does to the average American. They may only care that it saves them money. So what you end up with is people harming other people without telling them about it. Nothing wrong with regulating that.
It's not poisonous, it's definitely bad for you in large quantities, but it's not like it's arsenic . Trans fats were used because of their higher breakdown temperature made them ideal, but we are now finding that continuous intake of these fats is very bad for you and we're already moving away from it. The market forces have taken over and it doesn't take much to avoid trans fats these days. It's so not in "everything" like you seem to believe, and it's not like no one is saying anything about...like you seem to believe. It's out there, don't want trans fats...don't buy products with trans fats in there. Too lazy/stupid to do the research? Eat trans fats and get out of the gene pool. Government isn't here to save you from yourself. It's not like any of this information is hard to find or process. Restaurants will tell you if something has trans fats (most don't use them...hell even the fast food companies like Burger King have moved away from it...should maybe tell you a thing or two about market forces), it's on packaging of items you buy (not even Doritos has trans fat....Doritos man, those things are terrible for you and they don't use it), it's where you need to find it. There's no problem, it's already been taken care of. People found out how bad it was, people stopped buying it, companies and restaurants changed to recapture those people. Done and done.
Ikari is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 04-01-08, 04:49 PM   #25 (permalink)
Advisor

 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Last Online: 11-16-08 07:41 AM
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 547
Thanks: 93
Thanked 114 Times in 84 Posts
Lean: Slightly Conservative
Gender: Female

Awards:
US Navy:  Currently serving in the US Navy on active duty. 

Current Mood:
Tired
Re: Contraception Drugs and Pharmacist Refusal

This is really easy fix. If a person owns the pharmacy and doesn't want to sell contraceptives in whatever form, then don't order them. A pharmacy has to order the drugs they carry, so if they don't have them, they can't sell them. Real simple.

However, if a pharmacy does have them, that means they intend to sell them to the public. The pharmacy cannot pick and choose who they sell their products to (as long as there is a legitimate prescription) when those products are for sell to the public. A pharmacist that feels he/she can't for religious purposes sell a certain drug to someone should pass the order on to a coworker or be ready to be fired if the owner disagrees.
roguenuke is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 04-01-08, 09:27 PM   #26 (permalink)
Guru

 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Last Online: Today 08:38 AM
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,227
Thanks: 14
Thanked 272 Times in 202 Posts
Gender: Male

Re: Contraception Drugs and Pharmacist Refusal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
It's not poisonous, it's definitely bad for you in large quantities, but it's not like it's arsenic . Trans fats were used because of their higher breakdown temperature made them ideal, but we are now finding that continuous intake of these fats is very bad for you and we're already moving away from it. The market forces have taken over and it doesn't take much to avoid trans fats these days. It's so not in "everything" like you seem to believe, and it's not like no one is saying anything about...like you seem to believe. It's out there, don't want trans fats...don't buy products with trans fats in there. Too lazy/stupid to do the research? Eat trans fats and get out of the gene pool. Government isn't here to save you from yourself. It's not like any of this information is hard to find or process. Restaurants will tell you if something has trans fats (most don't use them...hell even the fast food companies like Burger King have moved away from it...should maybe tell you a thing or two about market forces), it's on packaging of items you buy (not even Doritos has trans fat....Doritos man, those things are terrible for you and they don't use it), it's where you need to find it. There's no problem, it's already been taken care of. People found out how bad it was, people stopped buying it, companies and restaurants changed to recapture those people. Done and done.
To respond to the ignorant statement I bolded above I submit the following sites. Only takes a minute to look at them, so unless you're too lazy/stupid, you may learn something.

Frito-Lay : BAKED! DORITOS NACHO CHEESE® Flavored Tortilla Chips
Frito-Lay : DORITOS Light NACHO CHEESE® Flavored Tortilla Chips
Frito-Lay : DORITOS Reduced Fat NACHO CHEESE® Flavored Tortilla Chips




Did you notice that Doritos claim on one section of their nutrition labeling that the products contain no trans fats? But if you also read the listed ingredients, you saw that those Doritos products all contain hydrogenated oils, which are trans fats.

There is currently a loophole manufacturers can use. If their product contains .5 grams of trans fats per serving, they can state there are no trans fats in a serving of the product. Frito Lay has you believing and stating on websites that Doritos contains no trans fats.

So I recommend we push government to force truth in advertising and limiting of dangerous non-necessary man-made ingredients in the food supply.

For your part, I just urge a little research before posting.

Last edited by tryreading : 04-01-08 at 09:32 PM.
tryreading is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
Old 04-25-08, 06:14 PM   #27 (permalink)
Bright Wizard

 
Mach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Last Online: 11-21-08 01:48 PM
Posts: 1,200
Thanks: 190
Thanked 283 Times in 200 Posts
Lean: Centrist
Gender: Male

Re: Contraception Drugs and Pharmacist Refusal

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikari View Post
Restaurants
That topic for today is "Pharmacy".

Quote:
The government can
...do whatever the people that form the government want it to do (in the U.S. case).

So, now we know it's about a pharmacy and that we are not in a state of anarchy (whew, I was about to go buy a ton of guns and trade all my money for gold and start conquest to take everything from you and laugh hysterically while doing so), maybe it can return to the topic.

I believe in the U.S. this falls under the states pharamcy laws and regulatory board. In some cases it may be legally not allowed to refuse lawful prescriptions.

In almost every other case the license requirements have wording like " in the best interest of the patient", which it is up to the board/state to decide if the pharamcist/pharmacy are violating that by using mystical gods as their determination of what is or is not in their customers best interest. I would always side with the side opposing mysticism and other hore****.

-Mach
__________________
Let teachers and priests and philosophers brood over questions of reality and illusion. I know this: if life is an illusion, then I am no less an illusion, and being thus, the illusion is real to me. I live, I burn with life, I love, I slay, and I am content.- Conan
Mach is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!Spurl this Post!
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No Birth Control for You! walrus Archives 59 05-24-05 04:40 AM

Navigation
Home Main
spacer Home
spacer Newsroom
spacer Resources
spacer FAQ
spacer Chatroom

Extras Extras
spacer DP Store
spacer Statistics
spacer Worldmap
spacer Gallery
spacer Link to us

 Advertise Here!

Random Pic
by Billo_Really
· · ·
Member Galleries
988 photos
217 comments



Debate Politics XML Feed

Add to my Yahoo!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 PM.

Partners with: Computer repair || Irrationally Informed

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Debate Politics.com Copyright ©2004-2008
SEO by vBSEO