Police inciting violence - Page 2

jfuh · 04-08-08, 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edify_Always_In_All_Ways

Not common, but possible. Why don't you care about this?

........ huh

Joe Hill · 04-24-08, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfuh

........ huh

Maybe I can help..."Why aren't you concerned about a Police State in America? The Founders were...that's why they wrote the Constitution and BOR. Do you know what those documents are"?

jfuh · 04-24-08, 04:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe Hill

Maybe I can help..."Why aren't you concerned about a Police State in America? The Founders were...that's why they wrote the Constitution and BOR. Do you know what those documents are"?

The first 10 amendments to the constitution?

Voidwar · 04-24-08, 04:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JeffMerriman

So, did the provocateurs actually provoke a riot in Quebec? Didn't look like it. Did the cops beat anybody? Nope. So how is this "police inciting violence?"

What was this deceptive cop doing there with a rock in his hand ?

They already admitted that they were cops.

What legitimate thing was this cop doing with that rock ? ? ?

Voidwar · 04-24-08, 04:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmilesAndFrowns

So your going to tell me you honestly believe that police officers dress up and throw rocks and bottles at police officers just so they can start a disbanning of the protest...really, thats the dumbest thing i have ever heard.

Except for the fact that they have admitted they were cops and the video shows the rock.

Lerxst · 04-24-08, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voidwar

What was this deceptive cop doing there with a rock in his hand ?

They already admitted that they were cops.

What legitimate thing was this cop doing with that rock ? ? ?

Did he throw the rock? NO. It was a PROP. Nobody said these guys were good at infiltrating the ranks of the protesters. There is no law against undercover cops infiltrating the ranks of protest groups when they assemble in public. It's commonly done in order to quickly identify and neutralize individuals within the group who actually incite ACTUAL violence.

Nobody in this incident, including the cops, incited ANY violence. Do your homework son.

That one was easy. Why don't you give me a tough question for a change.

Lerxst · 04-24-08, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voidwar

Except for the fact that they have admitted they were cops and the video shows the rock.

So? Did the cops do anything with the rock? No. You case is now officially hollow.

Voidwar · 04-25-08, 03:12 PM

So a cop, is willing to give another cop, the benefit of the doubt.

Anyone surprised ?

Anyone think that Jeff would think the rock in a real protesters hand was a "PROP" ? ? ?

Your bias is pretty evident. It was not a prop, as a prop would help one fit in, and yet, the protestors saw the rock, and none of the protestors had rocks. If he was trying to fit in, I think he would have had zero rocks, like the protestors who caught him.

This cop is a dirtbag, and anyone defending his actions, is a dirtbag.

You act like what he was doing is ok, because he was caught before he could finish. It isn't.

jfuh · 04-25-08, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voidwar

So a cop, is willing to give another cop, the benefit of the doubt.

Anyone surprised ?

Anyone think that Jeff would think the rock in a real protesters hand was a "PROP" ? ? ?

Your bias is pretty evident. It was not a prop, as a prop would help one fit in, and yet, the protestors saw the rock, and none of the protestors had rocks. If he was trying to fit in, I think he would have had zero rocks, like the protestors who caught him.

This cop is a dirtbag, and anyone defending his actions, is a dirtbag.

You act like what he was doing is ok, because he was caught before he could finish. It isn't.

I'm not a cop but I still give that guy the benefit of the doubt, now what?

Lerxst · 04-25-08, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Voidwar

So a cop, is willing to give another cop, the benefit of the doubt.

Anyone surprised ?

Anyone think that Jeff would think the rock in a real protesters hand was a "PROP" ? ? ?

Your bias is pretty evident. It was not a prop, as a prop would help one fit in, and yet, the protestors saw the rock, and none of the protestors had rocks. If he was trying to fit in, I think he would have had zero rocks, like the protestors who caught him.

This cop is a dirtbag, and anyone defending his actions, is a dirtbag.

You act like what he was doing is ok, because he was caught before he could finish. It isn't.

And you are exhibiting your typical "Voidwar Logic" model here as usual. The cop did not use the rock, he never acted like he was going to use the rock, and he never tried to use the rock. Your entire premise is bull**** because you have absolutely nothing to substantiate your accusation that they were anything but props. As usual, you are making accusations about cops you cannot back up. You are really one to be calling names.

Try again. This time bring something substantial. Or you can just keep insulting me because you lack any credibility on this forum.