aquapub

If you watch MSNBC a lot, you'll notice an overt anti-Hillary bias coupled with an equally overt pro-Obama bias. Does this scandalously slanted treatment of Hillary put to rest the issue of whether or not the media (if not just MSNBC) chooses a candidate and promotes their candidacy rather than simply reporting the news?

MSNBC’s Shuster Suspended for 'Pimped Out' Chelsea Remark | NewsBusters.org

BTW, notice how someone gets fired when somebody does this to Democrats for a change. Apparently the DNC failed to get their talking points memo out to MSNBC that day. It's also worth noting here that Hillary is the queen of targeting those who get in her way for humiliation and personal destruction (Lewinsky, Flowers, etc.).

Kind of hard to feel sorry for this week's Clinton victimhood routine.

__________________
They tell you they are not going to tax your family. No, they're just going to tax ‘businesses!’ So unless you buy something from a ‘business,’ like groceries or clothes or gasoline ... or unless you get a paycheck from a big or a small ‘business,’ don't worry ... it's not going to affect you. -Fred Thompson

Edify_Always_In_All_Ways

Gee whiz, what a credible source. Just tell me when Jenna Bush is targeted by the news. What has Chelsea done?

__________________
The flamethrower- proof that someone was thinking "I want to set that guy on fire, but I'm not close enough."

Gipper

Yeah I agree with you. Clinton victimhood is rather comical, especially when you consider that Bill married a vicious, anti-semetic b*tch who makes Leona Helmsley look like Strawberry Shortcake.

You can't blame them for wanting to support Obama who is known to be amicable and personable over debatably the most polarizing political figure of the last 50 years.

__________________
A government big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away. - Barry Goldwater

26 X World Champs

Where do you get your news from? Do you only listen to right wing radio and Fox News?

How ANYONE could espouse what you just posted is shocking. For example can anyone honestly believe that George W. Bush is LESS POLARIZING than Hillary?

What a bunch of BS.....

Sir Loin

Quote:

Originally Posted by 26 X World Champs Where do you get your news from? Do you only listen to right wing radio and Fox News?

Talk about a load of stinking steaming BS.........

26x, your comments are DOA. Gipper correctly pointed out that Hillary is a hugely polarizing figure and said nothing about Bush. Mainly since that is not the topic. Gipper correctly referred to the polling that has been going on for just a few bloody years, that supports exactly what was said.

How ANYONE can espouse the idea that Hillary Clinton is not a hugely polarizing figure (compared to Obama) is what is really shocking. Virtually every news source in American has reported on this, every pollster too. Gallup has done a thorough job of cataloging Hillary's polarizing effect on the public. To argue otherwise is frankly stupid and pointless. Naturally Bush must be drug into the conversation about Hillary by you…for what purpose I can’t imagine. Unless you were purposefully acting obtuse and uninformed. Throw in some basil “talk radio” idiocy and you do indeed have a bunch of BS.

And ahead of time, you bet I’ll be glad to point you in the direction of the massive amount of reporting and OP/EDs that detail Mrs. Clinton’s polarizing effect on the electorate versus Mr. Obama’s amiability. Since you seem to think they only exist in Limbaugh Land or some imaginary source.

__________________
I hate to break this to you but there is no big lie. There is no system, the universe is indifferent.

26 X World Champs

Perhaps you need to read Gipper's post again with a bit more clarity and comprehension? Here, allow me to quote him again:

See..50 years? That does include therefore the last 8 nightmarish years that we've had to endure. I wrote nothing about Obama. Your post went off on some wild tangent that had nothing to do with what I or Gipper wrote.

BTW - I voted for Obama in the NY primary though I would happily vote for Hillary in the general election.

Sir Loin

26 X World Champs

Would you care to show me where I wrote that Hillary was NOT polarizing? Please?

Allow me to repeat myself so that perhaps this time you will grasp the meaning of my post? I wrote previously that Hillary is not THE MOST polarizing American politician of the last 50 years. I wrote that our lame, idiotic, moronic, evil current President is MORE polarizing than Hillary. That's it. nothing more. You then twisted my simple words to fit whatever agenda you meant to put forth (it appears that means crapping all over anything Democratic).

I look forward to McCain and Bush standing side by side campaigning and it getting full national coverage in the media. Talk about free campaign fodder for Democrats!

Sir Loin

26 X World Champs

I believe there are more Republicans who will not vote for McCain than there are Democrats who will not vote for either Hillary or Obama.