Billo_Really

I'm sorry, I reject Oxford too.

Get another source.

You reject Columbia University, I reject Oxford.

Do you see how stupid this "source game" gets after awhile?

MSgt

It's your attitude. Hence your continual blessing of the report despite the common sense that contradicts it.

Yet the other overwhelming experts of the field who contradict this report are not to be trusted? The truth is that you choose to trust those that validate your grievances and protests rather than their expert offering.

You crucify yourself.

__________________

MSgt
Semper Fidelis
USMC

Billo_Really

So now you've become a Spin Doctor!

You see, you can't show any posts of mine to back up what you say.

The only thing you can do, is lie!

Tashah

Many posters here have offered rebuttal materials and logic. You choose to ignore/dismiss these items and exclusively promote the Lancet. That's your choice, but the undeniable fact remains that the Lancet Report has been contested on many different levels.

__________________

Reverend_Hellh0und

I most assuredly see something indeed that can be deemed "stupid".



You are cutting and running with your fingers in your ears once again.

__________________
كافر
Caith siar é agus ná lig anair á

Billo_Really

You're the one who can't deal with this issue.

Why?

Billo_Really

How many times do I have to say "I've not dismissed any report" before you drop this point from your agenda?

Reverend_Hellh0und

You dismissed the kane study because it was beyond your comprehension according to your own words.


Just saying now "I've not dismissed any report" does not make it true.

__________________
كافر
Caith siar é agus ná lig anair á

Billo_Really

I said I "...couldn't understand it".

There's a big difference.

Reverend_Hellh0und

Well tell me then about the raw data in the lancet report and how you feel its methodology make it accurate or even relevant.

__________________
كافر
Caith siar é agus ná lig anair á